Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Australia
Griffith University, Australia.
J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Dec;22(8):504-512. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16670495. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
We undertook a scoping review of the published literature to identify and summarise key findings on the telehealth interventions that influence waiting times or waiting lists for specialist outpatient services. Searches were conducted to identify relevant articles. Articles were included if the telehealth intervention restructured or made the referral process more efficient. We excluded studies that simply increased capacity. Two categories of interventions were identified - electronic consultations and image-based triage. Electronic consultations are asynchronous, text-based provider-to-provider consultations. Electronic consultations have been reported to obviate the need for face-to-face appointments between the patient and the specialist in between 34-92% of cases. However, it is often reported that electronic consultations are appropriate in less than 10% of referrals for outpatient care. Image-based triage has been used successfully to reduce unnecessary or inappropriate referrals and was used most often in dermatology, ophthalmology and otolaryngology (ENT). Reported reduction rates for face-to-face appointments by specialty were: dermatology 38-88%, ophthalmology 16-48% and ENT 89%. Image-based triage can be twice as effective as non-image based triage in reducing unnecessary appointments. Telehealth interventions can effectively be used to reduce waiting lists and improve the coordination of specialist services, and should be considered in conjunction with clinical requirements.
我们对已发表的文献进行了范围综述,以确定和总结影响专科门诊服务等候时间或等候名单的远程医疗干预措施的关键发现。进行了搜索以确定相关文章。如果远程医疗干预措施改变了结构或使转诊过程更有效率,则将纳入文章。我们排除了仅增加容量的研究。确定了两类干预措施 - 电子咨询和基于图像的分诊。电子咨询是异步的、基于文本的医患咨询。据报道,电子咨询在 34-92%的情况下可以避免患者和专家之间进行面对面预约。然而,通常报告说,电子咨询在不到 10%的门诊护理转介中是合适的。基于图像的分诊已成功用于减少不必要或不适当的转诊,并且在皮肤科、眼科和耳鼻喉科(ENT)中最常使用。按专业报告的面对面预约减少率为:皮肤科 38-88%,眼科 16-48%,ENT 89%。基于图像的分诊在减少不必要的预约方面比非基于图像的分诊有效两倍。远程医疗干预措施可有效用于减少等候名单并改善专家服务的协调,应结合临床需求进行考虑。