Pradhan Anita, Bhattacharya Preeti, Singh Shivani, Chandna Anil Kumar, Gupta Ankur, Bhandari Ravi
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, India.
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jun 30;49(3):125-134. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.3.125.
The aim of the study was to quantify and compare craniofacial asymmetry in subjects with and without symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs).
A total of 126 adult subjects were categorized into two groups (63 with a TMDs and 63 without a TMDs), based on detection of symptoms using the Temporomandibular Joint Disorder-Diagnostic Index (TMD-DI) questionnaire. Posteroanterior cephalograms of each subject were traced manually and 17 linear and angular measurements were analyzed. Craniofacial asymmetry was quantified by calculating the asymmetry index (AI) of bilateral parameters for both groups.
Intra- and intergroup comparisons were analyzed using independent -test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively, with a <0.05 considered statistically significant. An AI for each linear and angular bilateral parameter was calculated; higher asymmetry was found in TMD-positive patients compared with TMD-negative patients. An intergroup comparison of AIs found highly significant differences for the parameters of antegonial notch to horizontal plane distance, jugular point to horizontal plane distance, antegonial notch to menton distance, antegonial notch to vertical plane distance, condylion to vertical plane distance, and angle formed by vertical plane, O point and antegonial notch. Significant deviation of the menton distance from the facial midline was also evident.
Greater facial asymmetry was seen in the TMD-positive group compared with the TMD-negative group. The mandibular region was characterized by asymmetries of greater magnitude compared with the maxilla. Patients with facial asymmetry often require management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathology to achieve a stable, functional, and esthetic result. Ignoring the TMJ during treatment or failing to provide proper management of the TMJ and performing only orthognathic surgery may result in worsening of TMJ-associated symptoms (jaw dysfunction and pain) and re-occurrence of asymmetry and malocclusion. Assessments of facial asymmetry should take into account TMJ disorders to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes.
本研究的目的是量化并比较有和没有颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMDs)症状的受试者的颅面不对称情况。
根据使用颞下颌关节紊乱症诊断指数(TMD-DI)问卷检测到的症状,将总共126名成年受试者分为两组(63名患有TMDs,63名未患有TMDs)。手动描绘每个受试者的正位头颅侧位片,并分析17项线性和角度测量指标。通过计算两组双侧参数的不对称指数(AI)来量化颅面不对称情况。
组内和组间比较分别使用独立样本t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验进行分析,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。计算每个线性和角度双侧参数的AI;与TMD阴性患者相比,TMD阳性患者的不对称性更高。AI的组间比较发现,下颌角切迹至水平面距离、颈静脉点至水平面距离、下颌角切迹至颏下点距离、下颌角切迹至垂直面距离、髁突至垂直面距离以及垂直面、O点和下颌角切迹形成的角度等参数存在高度显著差异。颏下点距离面部中线的显著偏差也很明显。
与TMD阴性组相比,TMD阳性组的面部不对称性更大。下颌区域的不对称程度比上颌更大。面部不对称的患者通常需要治疗颞下颌关节(TMJ)病变,以获得稳定、功能良好和美观的效果。治疗期间忽视TMJ或未能对TMJ进行适当管理而仅进行正颌手术,可能会导致TMJ相关症状(颌功能障碍和疼痛)恶化以及不对称和错牙合复发。面部不对称评估应考虑TMJ紊乱,以提高诊断准确性和治疗效果。