Suppr超能文献

当代美国和英国 2 型糖尿病二线药物治疗的利用趋势。

Contemporary trends in the utilization of second-line pharmacological therapies for type 2 diabetes in the United States and the United Kingdom.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Oct;25(10):2980-2988. doi: 10.1111/dom.15196. Epub 2023 Jul 3.

Abstract

AIM

To examine trends of second-line glucose-lowering therapies among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating first-line metformin in the United States and the United Kingdom, overall and by subgroups of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and calendar time.

METHODS

Using the US Optum Clinformatics and the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified adults with T2D who initiated first-line metformin or sulphonylurea monotherapy, separately, from 2013 to 2019. Within both cohorts, we identified patterns of second-line medications through June 2021. We stratified patterns by CVD and calendar time to investigate the impact of rapidly evolving treatment guidelines.

RESULTS

We identified 148 511 and 169 316 patients initiating treatment with metformin monotherapy in the United States and the United Kingdom, respectively. Throughout the study period, sulphonylureas and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were the most frequently initiated second-line medications in the United States (43.4% and 18.2%, respectively) and the United Kingdom (42.5% and 35.8%, respectively). After 2018, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists were more commonly used as second-line agents in the United States and the United Kingdom, although these agents were not preferentially prescribed among patients with CVD. Initiation of first-line sulphonylureas was much less common, and most sulphonylurea initiators had metformin added as the second-line agent.

CONCLUSIONS

This international cohort study shows that sulphonylureas remain the most common second-line medications prescribed following metformin in both the United States and the United Kingdom. Despite recommendations, the use of newer glucose-lowering therapies with cardiovascular benefits remains low.

摘要

目的

在美国和英国,调查起始一线用二甲双胍治疗 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的患者中,二线降糖治疗趋势,总体上和按心血管疾病(CVD)亚组和时间进行分层。

方法

使用美国 Optum Clinformatics 和英国临床实践研究数据链,我们确定了从 2013 年到 2019 年分别起始一线用二甲双胍或磺酰脲单药治疗的 T2D 成年人。在两个队列中,我们在 2021 年 6 月之前确定了二线药物的使用模式。我们按 CVD 和时间进行分层,以研究治疗指南快速变化的影响。

结果

我们在美国和英国分别确定了 148511 例和 169316 例起始用二甲双胍单药治疗的患者。在整个研究期间,磺酰脲类药物和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂在美国(分别为 43.4%和 18.2%)和英国(分别为 42.5%和 35.8%)是最常起始的二线药物。2018 年后,钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂在美国和英国更常作为二线药物使用,尽管这些药物在 CVD 患者中并未优先使用。起始一线磺酰脲类药物的情况要少得多,而且大多数磺酰脲类药物的起始者都将二甲双胍添加为二线药物。

结论

这项国际队列研究表明,磺酰脲类药物仍然是美国和英国在起始用二甲双胍后最常使用的二线药物。尽管有建议,但具有心血管益处的新型降糖治疗的使用仍然较低。

相似文献

3
Ambulatory noninsulin treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States, 2015 to 2019.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Aug;23(8):1843-1850. doi: 10.1111/dom.14408. Epub 2021 May 6.
5
Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Effectiveness of Newer Glucose-Lowering Drugs Added to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):e012940. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012940. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
7

引用本文的文献

5
Use of, time to, and type of first add-on anti-hyperglycaemic therapy to metformin in Australia, 2018-2022.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jan;91(1):117-126. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16231. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
7
Real-World Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Initiating Treatment with Oral Semaglutide.
Diabetes Ther. 2024 Jul;15(7):1547-1559. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01589-4. Epub 2024 May 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Preference for Type 2 Diabetes Therapies in the United States: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Adv Ther. 2022 Sep;39(9):4114-4130. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02181-7. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1413-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022190. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
3
Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Lancet. 2019 Jul 13;394(10193):121-130. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3. Epub 2019 Jun 9.
4
Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2295-2306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811744. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
5
Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 24;380(4):347-357. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
6
Changing use of antidiabetic drugs in the UK: trends in prescribing 2000-2017.
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 28;8(7):e022768. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022768.
7
8. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: .
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S73-S85. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S008.
8
Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):644-657. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
9
Confounding by Indication in Clinical Research.
JAMA. 2016 Nov 1;316(17):1818-1819. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16435.
10
Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1834-1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验