• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国对 2 型糖尿病治疗药物的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Preference for Type 2 Diabetes Therapies in the United States: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

机构信息

Primary Care Department, Touro University California College of Osteopathic Medicine, Vallejo, CA, USA.

Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Plainsboro, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2022 Sep;39(9):4114-4130. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02181-7. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1007/s12325-022-02181-7
PMID:35797004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9402769/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition associated with substantial clinical and economic burden. As multiple therapeutic options are available, patient preferences on treatment characteristics are key in T2DM therapeutic decision-making. This study aimed to determine the preferences of US patients with T2DM for therapies recommended for first pharmacologic intensification after metformin.

METHODS

As part of a discrete choice experiment, an online survey was designed using literature review and qualitative interview findings. Eligibility was met by US patients with T2DM who were aged 18 years or older with an HbA ≥ 6.5%. Anonymized therapy profiles were created from six antidiabetic therapies including oral and injectable semaglutide, dulaglutide, empagliflozin, sitagliptin, and thiazolidinediones.

RESULTS

Eligible patients (n = 500) had a mean HbA of 7.4%, and a mean BMI of 32.0 kg/m, the majority of which (72.2%) were injectable-naïve. The treatment characteristic with greatest importance was mode and frequency of administration (35.5%), followed by body weight change (29.2%), cardiovascular event risk (19.1%), hypoglycemic event risk (9.9%), and HbA change (6.5%). An oral semaglutide-like profile was preferred by 91.9-70.1% of respondents depending on the comparator agent, and preference was significant in each comparison (p < 0.05); an injectable semaglutide-like profile was preferred by 89.3-55.7% of respondents in each comparison depending on the comparator agent.

CONCLUSION

Patients with T2DM in the USA are significantly more likely to prefer oral or injectable semaglutide-like profiles over those of key comparators from the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, and thiazolidinedione classes.

摘要

简介

2 型糖尿病(T2DM)是一种与大量临床和经济负担相关的慢性疾病。由于有多种治疗选择,患者对治疗特征的偏好是 T2DM 治疗决策的关键。本研究旨在确定美国 T2DM 患者对二甲双胍后首次药物强化治疗推荐的治疗方案的偏好。

方法

作为离散选择实验的一部分,使用文献回顾和定性访谈结果设计了在线调查。符合条件的患者为年龄在 18 岁或以上、糖化血红蛋白(HbA)≥6.5%的美国 T2DM 患者。从六种抗糖尿病药物中创建了匿名治疗方案,包括口服和注射用司美格鲁肽、度拉糖肽、恩格列净、西格列汀和噻唑烷二酮。

结果

符合条件的患者(n=500)的平均 HbA 为 7.4%,平均体重指数(BMI)为 32.0kg/m,其中大多数(72.2%)为首次注射。最重要的治疗特征是给药方式和频率(35.5%),其次是体重变化(29.2%)、心血管事件风险(19.1%)、低血糖事件风险(9.9%)和 HbA 变化(6.5%)。根据比较药物,91.9%-70.1%的受访者更喜欢口服司美格鲁肽样方案,且在每种比较中差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05);根据比较药物,89.3%-55.7%的受访者更喜欢注射用司美格鲁肽样方案。

结论

美国 T2DM 患者更倾向于选择口服或注射用司美格鲁肽样方案,而不是 GLP-1 受体激动剂、SGLT2 抑制剂、DPP-4 抑制剂和噻唑烷二酮类药物的关键对照药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206d/9402769/9fb4f7be8b74/12325_2022_2181_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206d/9402769/cbe0fb5465e0/12325_2022_2181_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206d/9402769/ed609774e372/12325_2022_2181_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206d/9402769/ebaaa9e5dbb7/12325_2022_2181_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206d/9402769/d439df63e9f0/12325_2022_2181_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206d/9402769/9fb4f7be8b74/12325_2022_2181_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206d/9402769/cbe0fb5465e0/12325_2022_2181_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206d/9402769/ed609774e372/12325_2022_2181_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206d/9402769/ebaaa9e5dbb7/12325_2022_2181_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206d/9402769/d439df63e9f0/12325_2022_2181_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206d/9402769/9fb4f7be8b74/12325_2022_2181_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Preference for Type 2 Diabetes Therapies in the United States: A Discrete Choice Experiment.美国对 2 型糖尿病治疗药物的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Adv Ther. 2022 Sep;39(9):4114-4130. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02181-7. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
Preference for Oral and Injectable GLP-1 RA Therapy Profiles in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Discrete Choice Experiment.日本 2 型糖尿病患者对 GLP-1RA 治疗方案的口服和注射偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):721-738. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01561-1. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
3
Budget Impact of Oral Semaglutide Intensification versus Sitagliptin among US Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Uncontrolled with Metformin.口服司美格鲁肽强化治疗与西格列汀相比用于治疗二甲双胍控制不佳的美国 2 型糖尿病患者的预算影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Mar;39(3):317-330. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00967-7. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
4
Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily sitagliptin as an add-on to metformin, thiazolidinediones, or both, in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 2): a 56-week, double-blind, phase 3a, randomised trial.每周一次司美格鲁肽对比每日一次西格列汀作为二甲双胍、噻唑烷二酮类药物或两者联合治疗的基础上加用药物,治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性(SUSTAIN 2):一项 56 周、双盲、3a 期、随机试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 May;5(5):341-354. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30092-X. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
5
SODIUM GLUCOSE COTRANSPORTER 2 AND DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE-4 INHIBITION: PROMISE OF A DYNAMIC DUO.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2与二肽基肽酶-4抑制作用:一对充满潜力的组合
Endocr Pract. 2017 Jul;23(7):831-840. doi: 10.4158/EP161725.RA. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
6
Efficacy and safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂口服司美格鲁肽治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;172:108656. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108656. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
7
Pharmacologic Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Available Therapies.2型糖尿病的药物治疗:现有疗法
Am J Med. 2017 Jun;130(6S):S4-S17. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.04.004.
8
Pharmacologic Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Available Therapies.2型糖尿病的药物治疗:现有疗法
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;120(1S):S4-S16. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide with flexible dose adjustment versus sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 7): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3a trial.口服司美格鲁肽灵活剂量调整与西格列汀治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效和安全性(PIONEER 7):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、3a 期临床试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Jul;7(7):528-539. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30194-9. Epub 2019 Jun 9.
10
Update on Cardiovascular Effects of Older and Newer Anti-diabetic Medications.新型与传统降糖药物对心血管影响的研究进展。
Curr Med Chem. 2018;25(13):1549-1566. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666170530075533.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
The Influence of GLP1 on Body Weight and Glycemic Management in Patients with Diabetes-A Scientometric Investigation and Visualization Study.GLP1 对糖尿病患者体重和血糖管理的影响——一项科学计量学调查和可视化研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 27;60(11):1761. doi: 10.3390/medicina60111761.
3
Evaluating Preferences of Hospitalized Diabetes Patients for Hospital-Wide Glycemic Control Programme: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

本文引用的文献

1
GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes - state-of-the-art.GLP-1 受体激动剂在 2 型糖尿病治疗中的应用——最新进展。
Mol Metab. 2021 Apr;46:101102. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101102. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
2
Reduction in HbA1c with SGLT2 inhibitors vs. DPP-4 inhibitors as add-ons to metformin monotherapy according to baseline HbA1c: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.SGLT2 抑制剂与 DPP-4 抑制剂联合二甲双胍单药治疗与基线 HbA1c 相比降低 HbA1c:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Diabetes Metab. 2020 Jun;46(3):186-196. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
3
Evaluation of the Clinical and Economic Burden of Poor Glycemic Control Associated with Therapeutic Inertia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States.
评估住院糖尿病患者对全院血糖控制方案的偏好:一项离散选择实验
J Diabetes Res. 2024 Sep 6;2024:2552658. doi: 10.1155/2024/2552658. eCollection 2024.
4
Preference for a Novel Oral Alternative to Parenterally Administered Medications.相比于胃肠外给药,对新型口服替代药物的偏好。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 30;18:1547-1562. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S463354. eCollection 2024.
5
Outcomes and Attributes Patients Value When Choosing Glucose-Lowering Medications: A Mixed-Methods Study.患者选择降糖药物时看重的结果和属性:一项混合方法研究。
Clin Diabetes. 2024 Summer;42(3):371-387. doi: 10.2337/cd23-0042. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
6
Real-world use of oral versus subcutaneous semaglutide in a cohort of type 2 diabetic patients: which option to which patient?真实世界中 2 型糖尿病患者使用口服或皮下司美格鲁肽的情况:哪种方案适合哪种患者?
J Endocrinol Invest. 2024 Nov;47(11):2679-2690. doi: 10.1007/s40618-024-02369-4. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
7
Contemporary trends in the utilization of second-line pharmacological therapies for type 2 diabetes in the United States and the United Kingdom.当代美国和英国 2 型糖尿病二线药物治疗的利用趋势。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Oct;25(10):2980-2988. doi: 10.1111/dom.15196. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
评估美国 2 型糖尿病患者因治疗惰性导致的血糖控制不佳的临床和经济负担。
Adv Ther. 2020 Feb;37(2):869-882. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01199-8. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
4
Risk of any hypoglycaemia with newer antihyperglycaemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2型糖尿病患者使用新型降糖药物发生低血糖的风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019 Nov 13;3(1):e00100. doi: 10.1002/edm2.100. eCollection 2020 Jan.
5
Semaglutide (SUSTAIN and PIONEER) reduces cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes across varying cardiovascular risk.司美格鲁肽(SUSTAIN 和 PIONEER)降低了不同心血管风险的 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管事件风险。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Mar;22(3):442-451. doi: 10.1111/dom.13955. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
6
Orally Administered Semaglutide Versus GLP-1 RAs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Previously Receiving 1-2 Oral Antidiabetics: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.口服司美格鲁肽与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂用于既往接受1-2种口服抗糖尿病药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Dec;10(6):2183-2199. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00706-y. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
7
Oral Semaglutide Versus Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled on Metformin: The PIONEER 2 Trial.口服司美格鲁肽对比恩格列净在二甲双胍控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效:PIONEER 2 研究。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Dec;42(12):2272-2281. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0883. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
8
Comparative efficacy of once-weekly semaglutide versus SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients inadequately controlled with one to two oral antidiabetic drugs: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.每周一次司美格鲁肽对比 SGLT-2 抑制剂治疗一种或两种口服降糖药控制不佳患者的疗效:系统文献回顾和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 23;9(7):e023458. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023458.
9
Patient preferences for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor-agonist treatment attributes.患者对胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂治疗属性的偏好。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Apr 17;13:561-576. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S187907. eCollection 2019.
10
Patient Preferences for GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Japan: A Discrete Choice Experiment.日本2型糖尿病患者对胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Apr;10(2):735-749. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0591-9. Epub 2019 Mar 7.