School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
GeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Aug;330:116054. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116054. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
Quality of life is a complex concept characterised by several dualities, it has many definitions depending on the field of research and an abundance of diverse objective and subjective measures. The latter often represents the extent of perceived (dis)satisfaction with various domains of life experienced by individuals or groups, and research is increasingly focusing on subjective measures of well-being to better understand personal drivers related to quality of life. A better understanding of these factors at a local level has potential to shed light on an often-overlooked aspect of the mental health landscape in Aotearoa New Zealand. Individual-level data on adults (15+ years) is sourced from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2018 (N = 47,949) and aggregate-level data from the Census 2018 (N = 3,775,854). Matching constraint variables include sex, age, ethnicity, highest qualification, and labour force status. Outcome variables include personal and national well-being scores from 0 to 10 (extremely dissatisfied-extremely satisfied). Spatial microsimulation is used to create a synthetic population based on the above data. Results show lower mean national well-being scores than personal well-being scores, with spatial variations that broadly reflect patterns of socioeconomic deprivation. Low mean values for both personal and national well-being scores are seen in rural areas of high socioeconomic deprivation, particularly those with large Māori populations. High mean values are associated with areas of low deprivation. Additionally, high national well-being scores are associated with areas of agricultural activity, particularly in the South Island. Consideration should be given to factors that influence responses in such topics however, including demographic profiles as well as economic and social conditions of individuals and their surrounding communities. This study demonstrates that spatial microsimulation can be used as a powerful tool to understand population well-being. It can help support future planning and resource allocation, aiding in achieving health equity.
生活质量是一个复杂的概念,其特点是存在多种二元性,它有许多定义,具体取决于研究领域,并且有大量不同的客观和主观衡量标准。后者通常代表个人或群体对生活各个领域的感知(不)满意度的程度,研究越来越关注主观幸福感衡量标准,以更好地理解与生活质量相关的个人驱动因素。在当地层面更好地了解这些因素有可能揭示新西兰心理健康领域中一个经常被忽视的方面。成年人(15 岁以上)的个体层面数据来自 2018 年新西兰态度和价值观研究(N=47949),而汇总层面数据来自 2018 年人口普查(N=3775854)。匹配的约束变量包括性别、年龄、种族、最高学历和劳动力状况。结果变量包括个人和国家幸福感得分,范围从 0 到 10(非常不满意-非常满意)。空间微观模拟用于根据上述数据创建一个综合人口。结果表明,国家幸福感得分的平均值低于个人幸福感得分,空间差异大致反映了社会经济贫困模式。在社会经济高度贫困的农村地区,个人和国家的幸福感得分都较低,特别是那些拥有大量毛利人人口的地区。低的个人和国家幸福感得分与低贫困地区有关。此外,高国家幸福感得分与农业活动地区有关,特别是在南岛。然而,在考虑这些主题的影响因素时,应该考虑人口统计概况以及个人及其周围社区的经济和社会状况。本研究表明,空间微观模拟可以作为理解人口幸福感的有力工具。它可以帮助支持未来的规划和资源分配,促进健康公平。