Department of Periodontics, Government Dental College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jun;27(12):5415-5420. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202306_32776.
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of hand and ultrasonic scaling and to evaluate the surface roughness on the root surface of periodontally involved teeth using a scanning electron microscope.
A sample of 90 single-rooted teeth with a hopeless prognosis was selected for the study and divided into three separate groups. Group I consist of no treatment. In Group II, hand scaling was done using Gracey curettes, and in Group III, ultrasonic scaling was done. The teeth were then extracted and fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution for 24-48 hours and subjected to scanning electron microscopic (SEM) evaluation.
The SEM analysis revealed that the remaining calculus index was found to be similar in the ultrasonic group and the hand scaling group, whereas the surface roughness was found to be the least in the ultrasonic group.
Hand instrumentation has resulted in more surface roughness as compared to ultrasonic instruments.
本研究旨在评估手动和超声洁治对牙周病受累牙齿的疗效,并通过扫描电子显微镜评估根面的表面粗糙度。
选择 90 颗预后不佳的单根牙作为研究样本,并分为三组。第 I 组不进行任何治疗。第 II 组使用 Gracey 刮治器进行手动洁治,第 III 组进行超声洁治。然后将牙齿取出,用 10%甲醛溶液固定 24-48 小时,进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估。
SEM 分析显示,超声组和手动组的剩余牙石指数相似,而超声组的表面粗糙度最低。
与超声器械相比,手动器械会导致更多的表面粗糙度。