Suppr超能文献

在体测量使用压电超声牙周刮治器清创时的力。

In-Vitro Measurement of Forces During Debridement with a Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Periodontal Scaler.

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024 Jun 12;22:223-230. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5458595.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigated the magnitude, direction, and temporal aspects of the force applied during instrumentation with a piezoelectric ultrasonic periodontal scaler, compared this force with recommendations in the literature, and assessed the influence of the profession (dentist or dental hygienist) and calculus hardness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The force applied by ten dental hygienists and six dentists during debridement of comparatively soft and hard artificial dental calculus with a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler was recorded in-vitro. The total force and its components in three axes were statistically analysed.

RESULTS

During debridement of soft artificial dental calculus, the mean total force applied by dental hygienists was 0.34 N (± 0.18 N, range: 0.13 N to 0.59 N) and by dentists 0.28 N (± 0.33 N, range: 0.06 N to 0.95 N), and the total force exceeded 0.5 N approximately 23% and 14% of the time for dental hygienists and dentists, respectively. During debridement of hard artificial dental calculus, the mean total force applied by dental hygienists was 0.63 N (± 0.40 N, range: 0.28 N to 1.64 N) and by dentists 0.57 N (± 0.17 N, range: 0.34 N to 0.76 N); the total force exceeded 0.5 N more than half of the time for both professions. On average, dental hygienists applied 1.85x (p = 0.04) and dentists 2.04x (p = 0.06) higher force on hard than on soft artificial calculus. However, dental hygienists and dentists used similar forces during the debridement of both hard (p = 1.00) and soft (p = 0.26) calculus.

CONCLUSION

The force applied during the debridement of hard artificial dental calculus was statistically significantly higher than during the debridement of soft artificial dental calculus. No statistically significant difference between dentists and dental hygienists was found. The force applied by both groups on soft and hard artificial dental calculus frequently exceeded recommended values.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了使用压电超声牙周洁治器时施加力的大小、方向和时间方面,将该力与文献中的建议进行比较,并评估了专业(牙医或牙科保健师)和牙垢硬度的影响。

材料和方法

在体外记录了十位牙科保健师和六位牙医在使用压电超声洁牙器清除相对较软和硬的人工牙垢时施加的力。对三个轴上的总力及其分量进行了统计学分析。

结果

在清除软人工牙垢时,牙科保健师的平均总力为 0.34 N(±0.18 N,范围:0.13 N 至 0.59 N),牙医为 0.28 N(±0.33 N,范围:0.06 N 至 0.95 N),总力超过 0.5 N 的时间大约分别为牙科保健师的 23%和牙医的 14%。在清除硬人工牙垢时,牙科保健师的平均总力为 0.63 N(±0.40 N,范围:0.28 N 至 1.64 N),牙医为 0.57 N(±0.17 N,范围:0.34 N 至 0.76 N);两种职业的总力超过 0.5 N 的时间超过一半。平均而言,牙科保健师在硬人工牙垢上施加的力比软人工牙垢高 1.85 倍(p = 0.04),牙医高 2.04 倍(p = 0.06)。然而,牙科保健师和牙医在清除硬(p = 1.00)和软(p = 0.26)人工牙垢时使用的力相似。

结论

清除硬人工牙垢时施加的力明显高于清除软人工牙垢时施加的力。未发现牙医和牙科保健师之间存在统计学差异。两组在软、硬人工牙垢上施加的力经常超过推荐值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/11619864/46757e60494a/ohpd-22-223-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验