INRAE, UR EABX, Cestas, France.
Laboratoire Microorganismes: Génome et Environnement, CNRS, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2023 Sep;42(9):1867-1888. doi: 10.1002/etc.5708. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
One of the major threats to freshwater biodiversity is water pollution including excessive loads of nutrients, pesticides, industrial chemicals, and/or emerging contaminants. The widespread use of organic pesticides for agricultural and nonagricultural (industry, gardening, etc.) purposes has resulted in the presence of their residues in various environments, including surface waters. However, the contribution of pesticides to the deterioration of freshwater ecosystems (i.e., biodiversity decline and ecosystem functions impairment) remains uncertain. Once in the aquatic environment, pesticides and their metabolites can interact with microbial communities, causing undesirable effects. The existing legislation on ecological quality assessment of water bodies in Europe is based on water chemical quality and biological indicator species (Water Framework Directive, Pesticides Directive), while biological functions are not yet included in monitoring programs. In the present literature review, we analyze 20 years (2000-2020) of research on ecological functions provided by microorganisms in aquatic ecosystems. We describe the set of ecosystem functions investigated in these studies and the range of endpoints used to establish causal relationships between pesticide exposure and microbial responses. We focus on studies addressing the effects of pesticides at environmentally realistic concentrations and at the microbial community level to inform the ecological relevance of the ecotoxicological assessment. Our literature review highlights that most studies were performed using benthic freshwater organisms and that autotrophic and heterotrophic communities are most often studied separately, usually testing the pesticides that target the main microbial component (i.e., herbicides for autotrophs and fungicides for heterotrophs). Overall, most studies demonstrate deleterious impacts on the functions studied, but our review points to the following shortcomings: (1) the nonsystematic analysis of microbial functions supporting aquatic ecosystems functioning, (2) the study of ecosystem functions (i.e., nutrient cycling) via proxies (i.e., potential extracellular enzymatic activity measurements) which are sometimes disconnected from the current ecosystem functions, and (3) the lack of consideration of chronic exposures to assess the impact of, adaptations to, or recovery of aquatic microbial communities from pesticides. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:1867-1888. © 2023 SETAC.
淡水生物多样性面临的主要威胁之一是水污染,包括过量的营养物质、农药、工业化学品和/或新兴污染物。有机农药广泛用于农业和非农(工业、园艺等)用途,导致其残留物存在于各种环境中,包括地表水。然而,农药对淡水生态系统的恶化(即生物多样性下降和生态系统功能受损)的贡献仍不确定。一旦进入水生环境,农药及其代谢物就会与微生物群落相互作用,造成不良影响。欧洲现有关于水体生态质量评估的法规基于水质化学和生物指标物种(水框架指令、农药指令),而生物功能尚未纳入监测计划。在本文献综述中,我们分析了 20 年来(2000-2020 年)关于微生物在水生生态系统中提供的生态功能的研究。我们描述了这些研究中调查的生态系统功能的集合,以及用于建立农药暴露与微生物响应之间因果关系的终点范围。我们专注于研究在环境现实浓度和微生物群落水平上的农药效应,以告知生态毒理学评估的生态相关性。我们的文献综述强调,大多数研究使用底栖淡水生物进行,自养和异养群落通常分别进行研究,通常测试针对主要微生物成分的农药(即自养生物的除草剂和异养生物的杀菌剂)。总体而言,大多数研究表明对所研究的功能具有有害影响,但我们的综述指出了以下缺点:(1)对支持水生生态系统功能的微生物功能的非系统分析;(2)通过代理(即潜在的胞外酶活性测量)研究生态系统功能(即养分循环),这些代理有时与当前的生态系统功能脱节;(3)缺乏对慢性暴露的考虑,以评估水生微生物群落对农药的适应、恢复或影响。Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:1867-1888。 © 2023 SETAC。