Fischer Florian, Lafleur Laurent, Lackermair Korbinian
Institut für Rechtsmedizin, LMU München, Nußbaumstraße 26, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Oberlandesgericht München, Nymphenburger Str. 16, 80335, München, Deutschland.
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2023 Sep;34(3):212-217. doi: 10.1007/s00399-023-00952-5. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
In 2021, about 75,000 persons in Germany died unnaturally or due to unexplained reasons. As a consequence, there are difficulties in more precisely identifying the time, cause and circumstances of death. Nevertheless, clarification is crucial not only from the clinical perspective, but these data are of considerable importance in the context of investigative procedures as they can be used to answer numerous legally relevant questions. Cardiac implantable devices (CIED) are of vital importance in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. In 2020 about 100,000 patients underwent CIED implantation in Germany. Therefore, CIED are present in a relevant proportion of the deceased mentioned above. The valuable source of information represented by postmortal CIED interrogation has been shown in numerous studies. Nevertheless, postmortal CIED interrogation is not routinely performed in the context of forensic medical examinations for reasons of practicability. This article summarizes benefits and limitations of postmortal CIED interrogation from the perspective of forensic medicine and cardiology and gives a recommendation for realization.
2021年,德国约有75000人死于非自然原因或原因不明。因此,更精确地确定死亡时间、原因和情况存在困难。然而,澄清不仅从临床角度至关重要,而且这些数据在调查程序中具有相当重要的意义,因为它们可用于回答许多与法律相关的问题。心脏植入式设备(CIED)在心律失常的治疗中至关重要。2020年,德国约有100000名患者接受了CIED植入。因此,上述死者中有相当一部分人植入了CIED。许多研究表明,死后CIED问询是有价值的信息来源。然而,出于实用性考虑,死后CIED问询在法医学检查中并非常规进行。本文从法医学和心脏病学的角度总结了死后CIED问询的益处和局限性,并给出了实现建议。