Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eur Spine J. 2023 Dec;32(12):4314-4320. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07838-7. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
To assess the diagnostic performance of three-dimensional (3D) CT-based texture features (TFs) using a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based framework to differentiate benign (osteoporotic) and malignant vertebral fractures (VFs).
A total of 409 patients who underwent routine thoracolumbar spine CT at two institutions were included. VFs were categorized as benign or malignant using either biopsy or imaging follow-up of at least three months as standard of reference. Automated detection, labelling, and segmentation of the vertebrae were performed using a CNN-based framework ( https://anduin.bonescreen.de ). Eight TFs were extracted: Variance, Skewness, energy, entropy, short-run emphasis (SRE), long-run emphasis (LRE), run-length non-uniformity (RLN), and run percentage (RP). Multivariate regression models adjusted for age and sex were used to compare TFs between benign and malignant VFs.
Skewness showed a significant difference between the two groups when analyzing fractured vertebrae from T1 to L6 (benign fracture group: 0.70 [0.64-0.76]; malignant fracture group: 0.59 [0.56-0.63]; and p = 0.017), suggesting a higher skewness in benign VFs compared to malignant VFs.
Three-dimensional CT-based global TF skewness assessed using a CNN-based framework showed significant difference between benign and malignant thoracolumbar VFs and may therefore contribute to the clinical diagnostic work-up of patients with VFs.
使用基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的框架评估三维(3D)CT 纹理特征(TF)的诊断性能,以区分良性(骨质疏松性)和恶性椎体骨折(VF)。
共纳入在两个机构接受常规胸腰椎 CT 检查的 409 例患者。VF 使用活检或至少 3 个月的影像学随访进行分类,以标准参考作为良性或恶性。使用基于 CNN 的框架(https://anduin.bonescreen.de)进行自动检测、标记和椎体分割。提取 8 个 TF:方差、偏度、能量、熵、短运行强调(SRE)、长运行强调(LRE)、运行长度非均匀性(RLN)和运行百分比(RP)。多元回归模型调整了年龄和性别,用于比较良性和恶性 VF 之间的 TF。
当分析 T1 至 L6 的骨折椎体时,两组之间的偏度存在显著差异(良性骨折组:0.70 [0.64-0.76];恶性骨折组:0.59 [0.56-0.63];p=0.017),表明良性 VF 的偏度高于恶性 VF。
使用基于 CNN 的框架评估的基于 3D CT 的全局 TF 偏度在良性和恶性胸腰椎 VF 之间存在显著差异,因此可能有助于 VF 患者的临床诊断。