Suppr超能文献

超高分辨率时间飞跃磁共振血管造影术在颅内动脉瘤无创评估中的应用,是否可替代术前 DSA?

Ultra-High-Resolution Time-of-Flight MR-Angiography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms, Alternative to Preinterventional DSA?

机构信息

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Baby Memorial Hospital, Calicut, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Dec;33(4):1115-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00062-023-01320-z. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The 3D time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3T shows high sensitivity for intracranial aneurysms but is inferior to three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (3D-DSA) regarding aneurysm characteristics. We applied an ultra-high-resolution (UHR) TOF-MRA using compressed sensing reconstruction to investigate the diagnostic performance in preinterventional evaluation of intracranial aneurysms compared to conventional TOF-MRA and 3D-DSA.

METHODS

In this study 17 patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms were included. Aneurysm dimensions, configuration, image quality and sizing of endovascular devices were compared between conventional TOF-MRA at 3T and UHR-TOF with 3D-DSA as gold standard. Quantitatively, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were compared between TOF-MRAs.

RESULTS

On 3D-DSA, 25 aneurysms in 17 patients were detected. On conventional TOF, 23 aneurysms were detected (sensitivity: 92.6%). On UHR-TOF, 25 aneurysms were detected (sensitivity: 100%). Image quality was not significantly different between TOF and UHR-TOF (p = 0.17). Aneurysm dimension measurements were significantly different between conventional TOF (3.89 mm) and 3D-DSA (4.2 mm, p = 0.08) but not between UHR-TOF (4.12 mm) and 3D-DSA (p = 0.19). Irregularities and small vessels at the aneurysm neck were more frequently correctly depicted on UHR-TOF compared to conventional TOF. Comparison of the planned framing coil diameter and flow-diverter (FD) diameter revealed neither a statistically significant difference between TOF and 3D-DSA (coil p = 0.19, FD p = 0.45) nor between UHR-TOF and 3D-DSA (coil: p = 0.53, FD 0.33). The CNR was significantly higher in conventional TOF (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, ultra-high-resolution TOF-MRA visualized all aneurysms and accurately depicted aneurysm irregularities and vessels at the base of the aneurysm comparably to DSA, outperforming conventional TOF. UHR-TOF with compressed sensing reconstruction seems to represent a non-invasive alternative to pre-interventional DSA for intracranial aneurysms.

摘要

目的

3T 下的三维时间飞跃(3D-TOF)磁共振血管造影(MRA)对颅内动脉瘤具有较高的敏感性,但在动脉瘤特征方面逊于三维数字减影血管造影(3D-DSA)。我们应用超高分辩率(UHR)TOF-MRA 结合压缩感知重建技术,与常规 TOF-MRA 和 3D-DSA 相比,研究其在颅内动脉瘤介入前评估中的诊断性能。

方法

本研究纳入了 17 例未破裂颅内动脉瘤患者。对比常规 3T 3D-TOF 和 UHR-TOF 与 3D-DSA 金标准,评估动脉瘤的尺寸、形态、图像质量和血管内装置的大小。定量比较 TOF-MRA 之间的对比噪声比(CNR)。

结果

在 3D-DSA 上,17 例患者中的 25 个动脉瘤被检测到。在常规 TOF 上,检测到 23 个动脉瘤(灵敏度:92.6%)。在 UHR-TOF 上,检测到 25 个动脉瘤(灵敏度:100%)。TOF 与 UHR-TOF 之间的图像质量无显著差异(p=0.17)。常规 TOF 测量的动脉瘤直径(3.89mm)与 3D-DSA 测量的直径(4.2mm,p=0.08)存在显著差异,但 UHR-TOF 测量的直径(4.12mm)与 3D-DSA 测量的直径无显著差异(p=0.19)。UHR-TOF 较常规 TOF 更能准确显示瘤颈处的不规则及小血管。计划使用的框架线圈直径和血流导向装置(FD)直径与 3D-DSA 相比,TOF 与 3D-DSA 之间无显著差异(线圈:p=0.19,FD:p=0.45),UHR-TOF 与 3D-DSA 之间亦无显著差异(线圈:p=0.53,FD:p=0.33)。常规 TOF 的 CNR 显著更高(p=0.009)。

结论

在本研究中,UHR-TOF 可可视化所有动脉瘤,并与 DSA 相比准确显示动脉瘤不规则及瘤颈处血管,其表现优于常规 TOF。应用压缩感知重建的 UHR-TOF 似乎代表了一种替代术前介入性 DSA 用于颅内动脉瘤的非侵入性方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c86/10654166/efc45c4c0584/62_2023_1320_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验