Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Baby Memorial Hospital, Calicut, Kerala, India.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Dec;33(4):1115-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00062-023-01320-z. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
The 3D time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3T shows high sensitivity for intracranial aneurysms but is inferior to three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (3D-DSA) regarding aneurysm characteristics. We applied an ultra-high-resolution (UHR) TOF-MRA using compressed sensing reconstruction to investigate the diagnostic performance in preinterventional evaluation of intracranial aneurysms compared to conventional TOF-MRA and 3D-DSA.
In this study 17 patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms were included. Aneurysm dimensions, configuration, image quality and sizing of endovascular devices were compared between conventional TOF-MRA at 3T and UHR-TOF with 3D-DSA as gold standard. Quantitatively, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were compared between TOF-MRAs.
On 3D-DSA, 25 aneurysms in 17 patients were detected. On conventional TOF, 23 aneurysms were detected (sensitivity: 92.6%). On UHR-TOF, 25 aneurysms were detected (sensitivity: 100%). Image quality was not significantly different between TOF and UHR-TOF (p = 0.17). Aneurysm dimension measurements were significantly different between conventional TOF (3.89 mm) and 3D-DSA (4.2 mm, p = 0.08) but not between UHR-TOF (4.12 mm) and 3D-DSA (p = 0.19). Irregularities and small vessels at the aneurysm neck were more frequently correctly depicted on UHR-TOF compared to conventional TOF. Comparison of the planned framing coil diameter and flow-diverter (FD) diameter revealed neither a statistically significant difference between TOF and 3D-DSA (coil p = 0.19, FD p = 0.45) nor between UHR-TOF and 3D-DSA (coil: p = 0.53, FD 0.33). The CNR was significantly higher in conventional TOF (p = 0.009).
In this pilot study, ultra-high-resolution TOF-MRA visualized all aneurysms and accurately depicted aneurysm irregularities and vessels at the base of the aneurysm comparably to DSA, outperforming conventional TOF. UHR-TOF with compressed sensing reconstruction seems to represent a non-invasive alternative to pre-interventional DSA for intracranial aneurysms.
3T 下的三维时间飞跃(3D-TOF)磁共振血管造影(MRA)对颅内动脉瘤具有较高的敏感性,但在动脉瘤特征方面逊于三维数字减影血管造影(3D-DSA)。我们应用超高分辩率(UHR)TOF-MRA 结合压缩感知重建技术,与常规 TOF-MRA 和 3D-DSA 相比,研究其在颅内动脉瘤介入前评估中的诊断性能。
本研究纳入了 17 例未破裂颅内动脉瘤患者。对比常规 3T 3D-TOF 和 UHR-TOF 与 3D-DSA 金标准,评估动脉瘤的尺寸、形态、图像质量和血管内装置的大小。定量比较 TOF-MRA 之间的对比噪声比(CNR)。
在 3D-DSA 上,17 例患者中的 25 个动脉瘤被检测到。在常规 TOF 上,检测到 23 个动脉瘤(灵敏度:92.6%)。在 UHR-TOF 上,检测到 25 个动脉瘤(灵敏度:100%)。TOF 与 UHR-TOF 之间的图像质量无显著差异(p=0.17)。常规 TOF 测量的动脉瘤直径(3.89mm)与 3D-DSA 测量的直径(4.2mm,p=0.08)存在显著差异,但 UHR-TOF 测量的直径(4.12mm)与 3D-DSA 测量的直径无显著差异(p=0.19)。UHR-TOF 较常规 TOF 更能准确显示瘤颈处的不规则及小血管。计划使用的框架线圈直径和血流导向装置(FD)直径与 3D-DSA 相比,TOF 与 3D-DSA 之间无显著差异(线圈:p=0.19,FD:p=0.45),UHR-TOF 与 3D-DSA 之间亦无显著差异(线圈:p=0.53,FD:p=0.33)。常规 TOF 的 CNR 显著更高(p=0.009)。
在本研究中,UHR-TOF 可可视化所有动脉瘤,并与 DSA 相比准确显示动脉瘤不规则及瘤颈处血管,其表现优于常规 TOF。应用压缩感知重建的 UHR-TOF 似乎代表了一种替代术前介入性 DSA 用于颅内动脉瘤的非侵入性方法。