Suppr超能文献

不必要的血液检查给患者、医院和环境带来的成本:普通外科患者中不当护理的三重底线。

Patient, hospital and environmental costs of unnecessary bloodwork: capturing the triple bottom line of inappropriate care in general surgery patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jul;12(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002316.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the extent of unnecessary care in general surgery inpatients using a triple bottom line approach.

DESIGN

Patients with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions were retrospectively evaluated for unnecessary bloodwork according to the triple bottom line, quantifying the impacts on patients, healthcare costs and greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon footprint of common laboratory investigations was estimated using PAS2050 methodology, including emissions generated from the production, transport, processing and disposal of consumable goods and reagents.

SETTING

Single-centre tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients admitted with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, gallstone pancreatitis and adhesive small bowel obstruction were included in the study. 304 patients met inclusion criteria and 83 were randomly selected for in-depth chart review.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

In each patient population, the extent of over-investigation was determined by comparing ordered laboratory investigations against previously developed consensus recommendations. The quantity of unnecessary bloodwork was measured by number of phlebotomies, tests and blood volume in addition to healthcare costs and greenhouse gas emissions.

RESULTS

76% (63/83) of evaluated patients underwent unnecessary bloodwork resulting in a mean of 1.84 phlebotomies, 4.4 blood vials, 16.5 tests and 18 mL of blood loss per patient. The hospital and environmental cost of these unnecessary activities was $C5235 and 61 kg COe (974 g COe per person), respectively. The carbon footprint of a common set of investigations (complete blood count, differential, creatinine, urea, sodium, potassium) was 332 g COe. Adding a liver panel (liver enzymes, bilirubin, albumin, international normalised ratio/partial thromboplastin time) resulted in an additional 462 g COe.

CONCLUSIONS

We found considerable overuse of laboratory investigations among general surgery patients admitted with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions resulting in unnecessary burden to patients, hospitals and the environment. This study identifies an opportunity for resource stewardship and exemplifies a comprehensive approach to quality improvement.

摘要

目的

使用三重底线方法描述普通外科住院患者中不必要的护理程度。

设计

回顾性评估患有简单急性外科疾病的患者根据三重底线进行不必要的血液检查,量化对患者、医疗保健成本和温室气体排放的影响。使用 PAS2050 方法估算常见实验室检查的碳足迹,包括从消费品和试剂的生产、运输、处理和处置过程中产生的排放。

设置

单中心三级保健医院。

参与者

患有急性单纯性阑尾炎、胆囊炎、胆总管结石、胆石性胰腺炎和粘连性小肠梗阻的患者被纳入研究。符合纳入标准的 304 名患者中,有 83 名患者被随机选择进行深入的图表审查。

主要观察结果

在每个患者人群中,通过比较已制定的共识建议中规定的实验室检查和已订购的实验室检查,确定过度检查的程度。通过抽血次数、检查次数和血液量以及医疗保健成本和温室气体排放量来衡量不必要的血液检查量。

结果

评估的 83 名患者中有 76%(63/83)进行了不必要的血液检查,导致每位患者平均抽血 1.84 次、4.4 个血瓶、16.5 项检查和 18 毫升血液流失。这些不必要活动的医院和环境成本分别为 5235 美元和 61 千克二氧化碳当量(每人 974 克二氧化碳当量)。一组常见检查(全血细胞计数、差异、肌酐、尿素、钠、钾)的碳足迹为 332 克二氧化碳当量。添加肝脏检查(肝酶、胆红素、白蛋白、国际标准化比值/部分凝血活酶时间)会导致额外的 462 克二氧化碳当量。

结论

我们发现,患有简单急性外科疾病的普通外科患者中,实验室检查的过度使用相当普遍,给患者、医院和环境带来了不必要的负担。本研究确定了资源管理的机会,并例证了全面质量改进方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79d/10335441/cc7ce9dd6a98/bmjoq-2023-002316f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验