Suppr超能文献

伐仑克林联合电子烟咨询戒烟:一项双盲、随机、平行分组、安慰剂对照试验。

Varenicline and counseling for vaping cessation: a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

Centre for the Prevention and Treatment of Tobacco Addiction (CPCT), University Teaching Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Center of Excellence for the Acceleration of HArm Reduction (CoEHAR), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2023 Jul 5;21(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02919-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vaping cessation is virtually unexplored. The efficacy and safety of varenicline for vaping cessation has not been studied and rigorous research is required to advance best practice and outcomes for people who use electronic cigarettes (EC) and want to quit. The objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of varenicline (1 mg BID, administered for 12 weeks, with follow-up to week 24) combined with vaping cessation counseling in exclusive daily EC users intending to quit vaping.

METHODS

Design: Double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

The study took place at a University-run smoking cessation center.

PARTICIPANTS

People who exclusively use ECs daily and intend to quit vaping.

INTERVENTION

A total of 140 subjects were randomized to either varenicline (1 mg, administered twice daily for 12 weeks) plus counseling or placebo treatment (administered twice daily, for 12 weeks) plus counseling. The trial consisted of a 12-week treatment phase followed by a 12-week follow-up, nontreatment phase.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was biochemically validated continuous abstinence rate (CAR) at weeks 4 to 12. Secondary efficacy end points were CAR at weeks 4 to 24 and 7-day point prevalence of vaping abstinence at weeks 12 and 24.

RESULTS

CAR was significantly higher for varenicline vs placebo at each interval: weeks 4-12, 40.0% and 20.0%, respectively (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = [1.25-5.68], P = 0.011); weeks 4-24, 34.3% for varenicline with counseling and 17.2% for placebo with counseling (OR = 2.52, 95% CI = [1.14-5.58], P = 0.0224). The 7-day point prevalence of vaping abstinence was also higher for the varenicline than placebo at each time point. Serious adverse events were infrequent in both groups and not treatment-related.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present RCT indicate that inclusion of varenicline in a vaping cessation program for people who use electronic cigarettes and intending to quit may result in prolonged abstinence. These positive findings establish a benchmark of intervention effectiveness, may support the use of varenicline combined with counseling in vaping cessation programs, and may also help guiding future recommendations by health authorities and healthcare providers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study has been registered in EUDRACT with Trial registration ID: 2016-000339-42.

摘要

背景

目前对电子烟戒烟几乎没有研究。尚未研究伐伦克林在电子烟戒烟中的疗效和安全性,需要进行严格的研究,以推进为希望戒烟的电子烟使用者提供最佳实践和结果。目的是评估伐伦克林(1mg,每日两次,持续 12 周,随访至 24 周)联合电子烟戒烟咨询在打算停止使用电子烟的电子烟(EC)的独家每日使用者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

设计:双盲、随机、平行组、安慰剂对照试验。

地点

该研究在一所大学开设的戒烟中心进行。

参与者

仅每天使用 EC 并打算停止使用电子烟的人。

干预

共有 140 名受试者被随机分配至伐伦克林(1mg,每日两次,持续 12 周)联合咨询或安慰剂治疗(每日两次,持续 12 周)联合咨询。该试验包括 12 周的治疗阶段和 12 周的非治疗随访阶段。

主要疗效终点

研究的主要疗效终点是治疗第 4 周到第 12 周的生物化学验证持续戒烟率(CAR)。次要疗效终点为第 4 周到第 24 周的 CAR 和第 12 周和第 24 周的 7 天电子烟戒烟点流行率。

结果

与安慰剂相比,伐伦克林在每个时间点的 CAR 均显著更高:第 4-12 周,分别为 40.0%和 20.0%(OR=2.67,95%CI=1.25-5.68,P=0.011);第 4-24 周,咨询联合伐伦克林的 CAR 为 34.3%,咨询联合安慰剂的 CAR 为 17.2%(OR=2.52,95%CI=1.14-5.58,P=0.0224)。在每个时间点,7 天电子烟戒烟点流行率也高于安慰剂。两组的严重不良事件均不常见,且与治疗无关。

结论

本随机对照试验的结果表明,在电子烟使用者的戒烟计划中加入伐伦克林可能会导致更长时间的戒烟。这些积极的发现确立了干预效果的基准,可能支持在电子烟戒烟计划中使用伐伦克林联合咨询,也可能有助于指导卫生当局和医疗保健提供者的未来建议。

试验注册

该研究已在 EUDRACT 注册,注册号为:2016-000339-42。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e3e/10321010/e9902659791f/12916_2023_2919_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验