• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

How to Determine If One Diagnostic Method, Such as an Artificial Intelligence Model, is Superior to Another: Beyond Performance Metrics.

作者信息

Park Seong Ho, Sul Ah-Ram, Han Kyunghwa, Sung Yu Sub

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Division of Healthcare Research Outcomes Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2023 Jul;24(7):601-605. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0448.

DOI:10.3348/kjr.2023.0448
PMID:37404103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10323419/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/10323419/bc4380298fee/kjr-24-601-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/10323419/a1156b1d1aca/kjr-24-601-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/10323419/4f977ace588b/kjr-24-601-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/10323419/bc4380298fee/kjr-24-601-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/10323419/a1156b1d1aca/kjr-24-601-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/10323419/4f977ace588b/kjr-24-601-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/10323419/bc4380298fee/kjr-24-601-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
How to Determine If One Diagnostic Method, Such as an Artificial Intelligence Model, is Superior to Another: Beyond Performance Metrics.如何确定一种诊断方法（如人工智能模型）是否优于另一种方法：超越性能指标。
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Jul;24(7):601-605. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0448.
2
Benchmark for peak detection algorithms in fiber Bragg grating interrogation and a new neural network for its performance improvement.光纤布拉格光栅解调中峰值检测算法的基准测试和用于其性能提升的新神经网络。
Sensors (Basel). 2011;11(4):3466-82. doi: 10.3390/s110403466. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
3
Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening.人工智能算法在糖尿病视网膜病变筛查中的应用。
Curr Diab Rep. 2022 Jun;22(6):267-274. doi: 10.1007/s11892-022-01467-y. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
4
Rethinking the performance comparison between SNNS and ANNS.重新思考 SNNS 和 ANNS 的性能比较。
Neural Netw. 2020 Jan;121:294-307. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
5
[Potential of methods of artificial intelligence for quality assurance].[人工智能方法在质量保证方面的潜力]
Ophthalmologe. 2020 Apr;117(4):320-325. doi: 10.1007/s00347-020-01063-z.
6
Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Survey.图神经网络中的可解释性：分类学综述。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2023 May;45(5):5782-5799. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3204236. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
7
Rethinking Algorithm Performance Metrics for Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Medicine.重新思考诊断医学中人工智能的算法性能指标
JAMA. 2022 Jul 26;328(4):329-330. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.10561.
8
Framework and metrics for the clinical use and implementation of artificial intelligence algorithms into endoscopy practice: recommendations from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Artificial Intelligence Task Force.将人工智能算法临床应用及实施于内镜检查实践的框架与指标：美国胃肠内镜学会人工智能特别工作组的建议
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 May;97(5):815-824.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.016. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
9
[Basis and perspectives of artificial intelligence in radiation therapy].[人工智能在放射治疗中的基础与前景]
Cancer Radiother. 2019 Dec;23(8):913-916. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
10
Artificial Neural Networks to Assess Virtual Reality Anterior Cervical Discectomy Performance.用于评估虚拟现实下颈椎前路椎间盘切除术性能的人工神经网络
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 Jul 1;19(1):65-75. doi: 10.1093/ons/opz359.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptual review of outcome metrics and measures used in clinical evaluation of artificial intelligence in radiology.人工智能在放射学临床评估中使用的结局指标和测量方法的概念性综述。
Radiol Med. 2024 Nov;129(11):1644-1655. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01886-9. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Survey on Value Elements Provided by Artificial Intelligence and Their Eligibility for Insurance Coverage With an Emphasis on Patient-Centered Outcomes.人工智能提供的价值要素及其纳入保险覆盖范围的资格调查——以患者为中心的结果为重点。
Korean J Radiol. 2024 May;25(5):414-425. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.1281. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
3
Strategies for Implementing Machine Learning Algorithms in the Clinical Practice of Radiology.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized Clinical Trials of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Why, When, and How?医学人工智能的随机临床试验：为何、何时以及如何进行？
Korean J Radiol. 2022 Dec;23(12):1119-1125. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0834.
2
Methods for Clinical Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Medical Diagnosis.用于医学诊断人工智能算法临床评估的方法。
Radiology. 2023 Jan;306(1):20-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.220182. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
3
Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI.
在放射科的临床实践中实施机器学习算法的策略。
Radiology. 2024 Jan;310(1):e223170. doi: 10.1148/radiol.223170.
人工智能驱动的决策支持系统早期临床评估报告规范：DECIDE-AI。
BMJ. 2022 May 18;377:e070904. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070904.
4
Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Software as Medical Devices for Chest Radiography: A Position Paper from the Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology.基于人工智能的软件作为胸部X线摄影医疗设备的应用：韩国胸放射学会立场文件
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Nov;22(11):1743-1748. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0544. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
5
Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI Extension.涉及人工智能干预的临床试验报告的报告指南：CONSORT-AI 扩展。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370:m3164. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3164.
6
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Automated Detection Algorithm for Major Thoracic Diseases on Chest Radiographs.基于深度学习的胸部 X 线片主要胸部疾病自动检测算法的开发与验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191095. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1095.
7
On determining the most appropriate test cut-off value: the case of tests with continuous results.关于确定最合适的检测临界值：连续结果检测的情况
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016 Oct 15;26(3):297-307. doi: 10.11613/BM.2016.034.
8
A simple decision analytic solution to the comparison of two binary diagnostic tests.一种简单的决策分析方法，用于比较两种二项诊断测试。
Stat Med. 2013 May 20;32(11):1865-76. doi: 10.1002/sim.5601. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
9
Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.决策曲线分析：一种评估预测模型的新方法。
Med Decis Making. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):565-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295361.
10
Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.受试者工作特征曲线及其在放射学中的应用。
Radiology. 2003 Oct;229(1):3-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2291010898.