Total solution of a smart shade matching.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The simulated color of restorations plays an important role in improving patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to test a new intelligent colorimetric solution using the Advanced Reflectionless Technology (ART) monitor and compare them using commercially available shade systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six participants' right maxillary central incisors were tested with three devices, including the AUO Display Plus (Group A), a Canon single-lens reflex camera with eLAB's polar eyes filter (Group E), and the VITA Easyshade V (Group V). Each porcelain tooth was divided into three areas, and was assigned a CIELAB L∗a∗b∗ value by using the VITA Easyshade V. The original data were compared with the CIELAB L∗a∗b∗ obtained using the VITA Easyshade V. A prosthodontist compared the color of the porcelain veneers by eyes and gave the scores from 1 to 3.

RESULTS

For the ΔE, the three areas of Group A had the smallest differences between the color of the fabricated teeth and that of the original teeth. Colorimetric analysis indicated that Groups A and V did not differ much in the color of the three areas of the tooth. Groups E and A exhibited significant differences between the cervical third and middle third of the tooth, and Groups E and V exhibited significant differences between the middle third and incisal third of the tooth.

CONCLUSION

Compared with traditional monitors, ART is closer to real images in terms of color, contrast, and detail grayscale. Technicians are able to produce realistic and pleasing colors.