髋关节表面置换术：过去、现在与未来。
Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Past, Present and Future.
作者信息
Al-Jabri Talal, Ridha Mohamed, McCulloch Robert Allan, Kayani Babar, Arif Anse, Habad Mohamed, Kosuge Dennis, Jayadev Chethan, Donaldson James, Skinner John A
机构信息
Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London Joint Reconstruction Unit, The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, Stanmore, HA7 4LP , Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital King Edward VII's Hospital, 5-10 Beaumont Street, Marylebone, London, W1G 6AA , King Edward VII Hospital.
Joint Reconstruction Unit Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust.
出版信息
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023 Jul 1;15:77745. doi: 10.52965/001c.77745. eCollection 2023.
Abstract
The history of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) has faced numerous challenges and undergone decades of evolution in materials and methods. These innovations have been translated to the successes of current prostheses and represent a surgical and mechanical achievement. Modern HRAs now have long term outcomes with excellent results in specific patient groups as demonstrated in national joint registries. This article reviews the key moments in the history of HRAs with specific emphasis on the lessons learnt, current outcomes and future prospects.
摘要
髋关节表面置换术（HRA）的历史面临着诸多挑战，在材料和方法方面经历了数十年的演变。这些创新已转化为当前假体的成功，代表了一项外科和机械方面的成就。正如国家关节登记处所示，现代髋关节表面置换术在特定患者群体中取得了长期良好效果。本文回顾了髋关节表面置换术历史上的关键节点，特别强调了从中吸取的经验教训、当前的治疗效果和未来的前景。
相似文献
1
Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Past, Present and Future.髋关节表面置换术：过去、现在与未来。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023 Jul 1;15:77745. doi: 10.52965/001c.77745. eCollection 2023.
2
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: is it safe and reliable? A synopsis of the past, the present, and the future of HRA.金属对金属髋关节表面置换术：它安全可靠吗？髋关节表面置换术的过去、现在与未来概述
EFORT Open Rev. 2024 Aug 1;9(8):751-761. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0099.
3
What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.髋关节表面置换术翻修后的再次翻修率是多少？来自AOANJRR的分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3458-64. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4215-z.
4
Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.对于65岁以下男性，伯明翰髋关节表面置换术的生存率是否优于某些传统髋关节置换术？来自澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Nov;478(11):2625-2636. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001453.
5
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients: international high-volume centres' report on the outcome of 11,382 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties in patients ⩽50 years at surgery.年轻患者的髋关节表面置换术：国际高手术量中心关于11382例年龄≤50岁患者接受金属对金属髋关节表面置换术的结果报告。
Hip Int. 2022 May;32(3):353-362. doi: 10.1177/1120700020957354. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
6
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.髋关节表面置换术与大直径头金属对金属全髋关节置换术的比较：芬兰关节置换登记处三种设计的比较。
Scand J Surg. 2014 Mar;103(1):54-9. doi: 10.1177/1457496913495345. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
7
Adverse Local Tissue Reactions are Common in Asymptomatic Individuals After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Interim Report from a Prospective Longitudinal Study.髋关节表面置换术后无症状个体中常见局部不良反应：一项前瞻性纵向研究的中期报告。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Dec 1;479(12):2633-2650. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001882.
8
Preliminary report of clinical experience with metal-on-highly-crosslinked-polyethylene hip resurfacing.金属对高交联聚乙烯髋关节表面置换临床经验的初步报告。
Bone Joint Res. 2019 Nov 2;8(10):443-450. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.810.BJR-2019-0060.R1. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.髋关节表面置换术10年生存率低。
Acta Orthop. 2016 Dec;87(6):554-559. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1246316. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
10
Clinical, functional and radiographic long-term follow-up (7-12 years) of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing, including metal ions evaluation: a single surgeon series. Birmingham 髋关节表面置换术的临床、功能和放射学长期随访（7-12 年），包括金属离子评估：单外科医生系列。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2024 Mar;90(1):41-45. doi: 10.52628/90.1.11664.
引用本文的文献
1
Artificial Intelligence Approach in Hip Prosthesis Identification and Addressing Radiographic Outcome Measures.人工智能在髋关节假体识别及处理影像学结果测量中的应用
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jun 3;33:101717. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101717. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The Choice of Hip Arthroplasty: HRA or THA? Revealed by Meta-Analysis.髋关节置换术的选择：髋关节表面置换术还是全髋关节置换术？荟萃分析揭示
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(6):1577-1588. doi: 10.1111/os.70019. Epub 2025 Mar 16.
3
Breaking Barriers: Addressing Gender Disparities in Hip Resurfacing Surgery Access in the United States.打破障碍：解决美国髋关节表面置换手术可及性方面的性别差异问题。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(11):810-812. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.80526.3679.
4
Establishing minimal clinically important differences and patient acceptable symptom state thresholds following birmingham hip resurfacing.建立 Birmingham 髋关节表面置换术后的最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态阈值。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3729-3737. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05443-x. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
5
Towards the First Generation of Biomimetic Fixation for Resurfacing Arthroplasty Endoprostheses.迈向用于表面置换关节成形术假体的第一代仿生固定技术。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;9(2):99. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9020099.
本文引用的文献
1
A meta-analysis assessing time for return to sport following hip resurfacing.评估髋关节表面置换术后恢复运动时间的荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):3575-3585. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04592-1. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
2
Hip Resurfacing vs Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 35 Years: A Comparison of Revision Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes.35岁以下患者的髋关节表面置换术与全髋关节置换术：翻修率及患者报告结局的比较
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Oct 8;11:229-233. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.09.004. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients: international high-volume centres' report on the outcome of 11,382 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties in patients ⩽50 years at surgery.年轻患者的髋关节表面置换术：国际高手术量中心关于11382例年龄≤50岁患者接受金属对金属髋关节表面置换术的结果报告。
Hip Int. 2022 May;32(3):353-362. doi: 10.1177/1120700020957354. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Resistance of a novel ceramic acetabular cup to critical impact loads.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2020 Oct;234(10):1122-1128. doi: 10.1177/0954411920941383. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
5
Mid-term results of a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing large-head metal-on-metal hip replacement to hip resurfacing using patient-reported outcome measures and objective functional task-based outcomes.大直径金属对金属髋关节置换与髋关节表面置换的前瞻性随机对照研究的中期结果：基于患者报告的结果测量和客观功能任务的结果。
Hip Int. 2021 Sep;31(5):637-643. doi: 10.1177/1120700020919671. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Return to sports after hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a mid-term case control study.髋关节表面置换与全髋关节置换术后重返运动：中期病例对照研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Jul;140(7):957-962. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03414-6. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
Hip resurfacing generates a more physiological gait than total hip replacement: A case-control study.髋关节表面置换术比全髋关节置换术产生更生理性的步态：一项病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May;106(3):527-534. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.12.020. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
8
Preliminary report of clinical experience with metal-on-highly-crosslinked-polyethylene hip resurfacing.金属对高交联聚乙烯髋关节表面置换临床经验的初步报告。
Bone Joint Res. 2019 Nov 2;8(10):443-450. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.810.BJR-2019-0060.R1. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Conversion of Hip Resurfacing With Retention of Monoblock Acetabular Shell Using Dual-Mobility Components.髋关节表面置换术中保留一体式髋臼壳并使用双动组件进行转换。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Sep;34(9):2037-2044. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.065. Epub 2019 May 14.
10
Is there evidence to support an indication for surface replacement arthroplasty?: a systematic review.是否有证据支持表面置换关节成形术的适应证？：系统评价。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jan;101-B(1_Supple_A):32-40. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0508.R1.
Zotero 插件