• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智利特有维管植物特有属的进化多样性及其对保护的影响。

Evolutionary diversity of the endemic genera of the vascular flora of Chile and its implications for conservation.

机构信息

Herbario VALPL y Laboratorio de Botánica, Departamento de Ciencias y Geografía, Universidad de Playa Ancha, Valparaíso, Chile.

Jardín Botánico Nacional, Viña del Mar, Chile.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 5;18(7):e0287957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287957. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0287957
PMID:37406022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10321618/
Abstract

As a direct consequence of global change, both natural and human-induced, a high percentage of biodiversity is now under threat worldwide. This has urged conservation planners to formulate and/or improve existing strategies to preserve species and their ecosystems. In this context, the present study focuses on two strategies using phylogeny-based measures of biodiversity to account for the processes that led to the biodiversity patterns observed today. It will contribute additional information that can aid decision-making regarding the assignment of threat status for some species, thus strengthening measures currently in use and facilitate the allocation of often scarce conservation resources. The Evolutionarily Distinct (ED) index prioritises species that are on long branches of the tree of life with few descendants, and the Evolutionarily Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) index integrates evolutionary history with IUCN Red List threat status of species. It has been used mostly in animal groups, but since the threats faced by many plants have not been evaluated, it has been more difficult to compile for plants worldwide. Here, we apply the EDGE metric to species of the endemic genera of Chile. However, more than 50% of the endemic flora of the country are still lacking official threat status. We thus used an alternative measure (Relative Evolutionary Distinctness-RED), based on a range-weighted phylogenetic tree, which uses geographic ranges to adjust branch lengths, and calculate ED. The RED index was shown to be a suitable measure, yielding similar results compared to EDGE, at least for this group of species. Given the urgency to halt biodiversity loss and the time it would take to evaluate all species, we propose that this index is used to set conservation priorities until we can calculate EDGE for these unique endemic species. This would allow guiding decision-making until we can gather more data to assess and assign conservation status to new species.

摘要

由于全球变化的直接影响,包括自然和人为因素,现在全球有很大比例的生物多样性受到威胁。这促使保护规划者制定和/或改进现有的策略,以保护物种及其生态系统。在这种情况下,本研究侧重于使用基于系统发育的生物多样性措施的两种策略,以解释导致今天观察到的生物多样性模式的过程。它将提供额外的信息,有助于决策一些物种的威胁状况,从而加强目前使用的措施,并促进经常稀缺的保护资源的分配。进化独特(ED)指数优先考虑那些在生命之树的长分支上且后代较少的物种,而进化独特且全球濒危(EDGE)指数则将进化历史与物种的 IUCN 红色名录威胁状况相结合。它主要用于动物群体,但由于许多植物面临的威胁尚未得到评估,因此更难以在全球范围内为植物编制 EDGE 指数。在这里,我们将 EDGE 指标应用于智利特有属的物种。然而,该国超过 50%的特有植物群仍然缺乏官方的威胁状况。因此,我们使用了一种替代措施(相对进化独特性-RED),该措施基于一个范围加权的系统发育树,该树使用地理范围来调整分支长度,并计算 ED。RED 指数被证明是一种合适的措施,与 EDGE 相比,至少对于这组物种,结果相似。鉴于阻止生物多样性丧失的紧迫性和评估所有物种所需的时间,我们建议在我们能够为这些独特的特有物种计算 EDGE 之前,使用该指数来确定保护重点。这将有助于指导决策,直到我们能够收集更多的数据来评估和分配新物种的保护状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e306/10321618/d8322de5ecef/pone.0287957.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e306/10321618/803ae38b54a4/pone.0287957.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e306/10321618/1236a8bc40db/pone.0287957.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e306/10321618/d8322de5ecef/pone.0287957.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e306/10321618/803ae38b54a4/pone.0287957.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e306/10321618/1236a8bc40db/pone.0287957.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e306/10321618/d8322de5ecef/pone.0287957.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolutionary diversity of the endemic genera of the vascular flora of Chile and its implications for conservation.智利特有维管植物特有属的进化多样性及其对保护的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 5;18(7):e0287957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287957. eCollection 2023.
2
Tetrapods on the EDGE: Overcoming data limitations to identify phylogenetic conservation priorities.四足动物在边缘:克服数据限制以确定系统发育保护优先级。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0194680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194680. eCollection 2018.
3
Extinction risk of the endemic vascular flora of Kauai, Hawaii, based on IUCN assessments.基于 IUCN 评估的夏威夷考艾岛特有维管束植物的灭绝风险。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Aug;36(4):e13896. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13896. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
Global distribution and conservation of evolutionary distinctness in birds.鸟类进化独特性的全球分布和保护。
Curr Biol. 2014 May 5;24(9):919-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
5
Plants on the IUCN Red List: setting priorities to inform conservation.列入 IUCN 红色名录的植物:确定保护重点。
Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Nov;14(11):638-42. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.08.012. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
6
Ranking Mammal Species for Conservation and the Loss of Both Phylogenetic and Trait Diversity.对哺乳动物物种进行保护排名以及系统发育和性状多样性的丧失
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 2;10(12):e0141435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141435. eCollection 2015.
7
Application of the Red List Index for conservation assessment of Spanish vascular plants.红色名录指数在西班牙维管植物保护评估中的应用。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):910-9. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12437. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
8
The need to rationalize and prioritize threatening processes used to determine threat status in the IUCN Red List.需要对用于确定 IUCN 红色名录中威胁状况的威胁过程进行合理化和优先级排序。
Conserv Biol. 2009 Dec;23(6):1568-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01260.x. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
9
Conservation priority of global Galliformes species based on phylogenetic diversity.基于系统发育多样性的全球鸡形目物种保护优先级
Integr Zool. 2014 Jun;9(3):340-8. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12075.
10
An integrative synthesis to global amphibian conservation priorities.全球两栖动物保护优先事项的综合综合评估。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Oct;27(19):4516-4529. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15734. Epub 2021 Jul 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The EDGE2 protocol: Advancing the prioritisation of Evolutionarily Distinct and Globally Endangered species for practical conservation action.EDGE2 协议:推进具有独特进化地位和全球濒危物种的优先级排序,以采取实际保护行动。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Feb 28;21(2):e3001991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001991. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Global priorities for conservation of reptilian phylogenetic diversity in the face of human impacts.面对人类活动的影响,保护爬行动物系统发育多样性的全球优先事项。
Nat Commun. 2020 May 26;11(1):2616. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16410-6.
3
Rapid Least Concern: towards automating Red List assessments.
快速低关注度:迈向濒危物种红色名录评估自动化
Biodivers Data J. 2020 Jan 23;8:e47018. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e47018. eCollection 2020.
4
Gymnosperms on the EDGE.裸子植物在边缘。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 16;8(1):6053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24365-4.
5
Tetrapods on the EDGE: Overcoming data limitations to identify phylogenetic conservation priorities.四足动物在边缘:克服数据限制以确定系统发育保护优先级。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0194680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194680. eCollection 2018.
6
Global priorities for conserving the evolutionary history of sharks, rays and chimaeras.保护鲨鱼、鳐鱼和银鲛进化史的全球优先事项。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Feb;2(2):288-298. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0448-4. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
7
An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial Realm.基于生态区的方法保护一半的陆地领地。
Bioscience. 2017 Jun 1;67(6):534-545. doi: 10.1093/biosci/bix014. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
8
Spatial phylogenetics of the vascular flora of Chile.智利维管植物区系的空间系统发育学
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2017 Jul;112:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.04.021. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
9
Integrating biogeography, threat and evolutionary data to explore extinction crisis in the taxonomic group of cycads.整合生物地理学、威胁因素和进化数据,以探究苏铁类分类群中的灭绝危机。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 21;7(8):2735-2746. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2660. eCollection 2017 Apr.
10
Green Plants in the Red: A Baseline Global Assessment for the IUCN Sampled Red List Index for Plants.红色名录中的绿色植物:世界自然保护联盟(IUCN)植物抽样红色名录指数的全球基线评估
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):e0135152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135152. eCollection 2015.