Park Soohyung, Rha Seung-Woon, Choi Byoung Geol, Kim Woohyeun, Choi Woong Gil, Lee Seung Jin, Lee Jae Beom, Park Ji Young, Park Sang Min, Jeong Myung Ho, Kim Yong Hoon, Her Ae-Young, Kim Min Woong, Chen Kang-Yin, Kim Bae Keun, Shin Eun-Seok, Seo Jae-Bin, Ahn Jihun, Choi Se Yeon, Byun Jae Kyeong, Cha Jin Ah, Hyun Su Jin, Choi Cheol Ung, Park Chang Gyu
Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Am Heart J. 2023 Nov;265:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.06.015. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
Previous studies reported that compared to conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT; aspirin + clopidogrel), triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT), involving the addition of cilostazol to DAT, had better clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the optimal duration of TAT is yet to be determined.
In total, 985 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs) were prospectively enrolled in 15 PCI centers in South Korea and China. We randomly assigned patients into 3 groups: DAT (aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months), TAT 1M (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for 1 month), and TAT 6M (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for 6 months). The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as a composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization.
The primary endpoint did not differ among the 3 groups (8.8% in DAT, 11.0% in TAT 1M, and 11.6% in TAT 6M; hazard ratio for TAT 1M vs DAT, 1.302; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.792-2.141; P = .297; hazard ratio for TAT 6M vs DAT, 1.358; 95% CI, 0.829-2.225; P = .225). With respect to in-hospital outcomes, more bleeding events occurred in the TAT group than in the DAT group (1.3% vs 4.7% vs 2.6%, P = .029), with no significant differences in major bleeding events. Additionally, the TAT group had a higher incidence of headaches (0% vs 1.6% vs 2.6%, P = .020).
The addition of cilostazol to DAT did not reduce the incidence of 1-year MACEs compared with DAT alone. Instead, it may be associated with an increased risk of drug intolerance and side effects, including in-hospital bleeding and headaches.
既往研究报道,与传统双联抗血小板治疗(DAT;阿司匹林+氯吡格雷)相比,三联抗血小板治疗(TAT,即在DAT基础上加用西洛他唑)在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中具有更好的临床结局。然而,TAT的最佳疗程尚未确定。
韩国和中国的15家PCI中心前瞻性纳入了985例行药物洗脱支架(DES)植入的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的STEMI患者。我们将患者随机分为3组:DAT组(阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗12个月)、TAT 1M组(阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和西洛他唑治疗1个月)和TAT 6M组(阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和西洛他唑治疗6个月)。主要终点为1年主要不良心血管事件(MACE),定义为全因死亡、再发心肌梗死、卒中或再次血运重建的复合终点。
3组的主要终点无差异(DAT组为8.8%,TAT 1M组为11.0%,TAT 6M组为11.6%;TAT 1M组与DAT组相比的风险比为1.302;95%置信区间[CI]为0.792-2.141;P = 0.297;TAT 6M组与DAT组相比的风险比为1.358;95%CI为0.829-2.225;P = 0.225)。关于院内结局,TAT组的出血事件比DAT组更多(分别为1.3%、4.7%和2.6%,P = 0.029),主要出血事件无显著差异。此外,TAT组的头痛发生率更高(分别为0%、1.6%和2.6%,P = 0.020)。
与单用DAT相比,在DAT基础上加用西洛他唑并未降低1年MACE的发生率。相反,它可能与药物不耐受及副作用风险增加有关,包括院内出血和头痛。