Lee Cheol Hyun, Lee Jong-Young, Park Gyung-Min, Lee Seung-Whan, Kim Hyun-Sook, Choi Young Jin, Nam Chang-Wook, Cho Jang Hyun, Shin Won-Yong, Seo Jae Bin, Choi Si Wan, Lee Jae-Hwan, Min Pil-Ki, Her Sung-Ho, Lee Pil Hyung, Ahn Jung-Min, Park Duk-Woo, Kang Soo-Jin, Kim Young-Hak, Lee Cheol Whan, Park Seong-Wook, Park Seung-Jung
Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Feb 15;121(4):423-429. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
This study sought to evaluate the impact of triple antiplatelet therapy on clinical outcomes in patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) for coronary artery disease. There are limited data regarding the impact of triple antiplatelet therapy in patients who underwent implantation of second-generation DES. We planned to randomly assign 2,110 patients treated with second-generation DES to triple (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol) and dual (aspirin, clopidogrel, and placebo) antiplatelet therapy groups. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year since randomization. The study was stopped early owing to slow enrollment. In total, 404 patients (202 patients each in the triple and dual antiplatelet therapy groups) were finally enrolled. At 1 year, the primary end point had occurred in 3.6% and 9.4% of patients in the triple and dual antiplatelet therapy groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] of the triple group 0.396; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.166 to 0.949; p = 0.038). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the occurrence of a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke (HR 0.583; 95% CI 0.229 to 1.481; p = 0.256). However, the rates of TVR were significantly lower in the triple antiplatelet therapy group than in the dual antiplatelet therapy group (HR 0.118; 95% CI 0.015 to 0.930; p = 0.043). In conclusion, triple antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol after implantation of second-generation DES improved clinical outcomes, mainly by reducing TVR.
本研究旨在评估三联抗血小板治疗对接受第二代药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗冠心病患者临床结局的影响。关于三联抗血小板治疗对接受第二代DES植入患者的影响,相关数据有限。我们计划将2110例接受第二代DES治疗的患者随机分为三联(阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和西洛他唑)和双联(阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和安慰剂)抗血小板治疗组。主要终点是随机分组后1年时的死亡、心肌梗死、缺血性卒中或靶血管血运重建(TVR)的复合终点。由于入组缓慢,该研究提前终止。最终共纳入404例患者(三联和双联抗血小板治疗组各202例)。1年时,三联和双联抗血小板治疗组的主要终点发生率分别为3.6%和9.4%(三联组的风险比[HR]为0.396;95%置信区间[CI]为0.166至0.949;p = 0.038)。两组在全因死亡、心肌梗死或缺血性卒中的复合终点发生率方面无显著差异(HR为0.583;95%CI为0.229至1.481;p = 0.256)。然而,三联抗血小板治疗组的TVR发生率显著低于双联抗血小板治疗组(HR为0.118;95%CI为0.015至0.930;p = 0.043)。总之,第二代DES植入后使用西洛他唑进行三联抗血小板治疗可改善临床结局,主要是通过降低TVR来实现。