• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[100千伏峰值下用于头颈部CT血管造影的深度学习重建算法重建图像的质量]

[Quality of Images Reconstructed by Deep Learning Reconstruction Algorithm for Head and Neck CT Angiography at 100 kVp].

作者信息

Lu Xiao-Ping, Wang Yun, Chen Yu, Wang Yan-Ling, Xu Min, Jin Zheng-Yu

机构信息

Department of Radiology,PUMC Hospital,CAMS and PUMC,Beijing 100730,China.

Canon Medical System (China) Company Limited,Beijing 100015,China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2023 Jun;45(3):416-421. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.15170.

DOI:10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.15170
PMID:37407528
Abstract

Objective To evaluate the impact of deep learning reconstruction algorithm on the image quality of head and neck CT angiography (CTA) at 100 kVp. Methods CT scanning was performed at 100 kVp for the 37 patients who underwent head and neck CTA in PUMC Hospital from March to April in 2021.Four sets of images were reconstructed by three-dimensional adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR 3D) and advanced intelligent Clear-IQ engine (AiCE) (low,medium,and high intensity algorithms),respectively.The average CT value,standard deviation (SD),signal-to-noise ratio (SNR),and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the region of interest in the transverse section image were calculated.Furthermore,the four sets of sagittal maximum intensity projection images of the anterior cerebral artery were scored (1 point:poor,5 points:excellent). Results The SNR and CNR showed differences in the images reconstructed by AiCE (low,medium,and high intensity) and AIDR 3D (all <0.01).The quality scores of the image reconstructed by AiCE (low,medium,and high intensity) and AIDR 3D were 4.78±0.41,4.92±0.27,4.97±0.16,and 3.92±0.27,respectively,which showed statistically significant differences (all <0.001). Conclusion AiCE outperformed AIDR 3D in reconstructing the images of head and neck CTA at 100 kVp,being capable of improving image quality and applicable in clinical examinations.

摘要

目的 评估深度学习重建算法对100 kVp下头颈CT血管造影(CTA)图像质量的影响。方法 对2021年3月至4月在阜外医院行头颈CTA的37例患者采用100 kVp进行CT扫描。分别采用三维自适应迭代剂量降低(AIDR 3D)和高级智能清晰成像引擎(AiCE)(低、中、高强度算法)重建四组图像。计算横断面图像感兴趣区域的平均CT值、标准差(SD)、信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)。此外,对四组大脑前动脉矢状面最大密度投影图像进行评分(1分:差,5分:优)。结果 AiCE(低、中、高强度)和AIDR 3D重建的图像在SNR和CNR上存在差异(均<0.01)。AiCE(低、中、高强度)和AIDR 3D重建图像的质量评分分别为4.78±0.41、4.92±0.27、4.97±0.16和3.92±0.27,差异有统计学意义(均<0.001)。结论 在100 kVp下重建头颈CTA图像时,AiCE优于AIDR 3D,能够提高图像质量,适用于临床检查。

相似文献

1
[Quality of Images Reconstructed by Deep Learning Reconstruction Algorithm for Head and Neck CT Angiography at 100 kVp].[100千伏峰值下用于头颈部CT血管造影的深度学习重建算法重建图像的质量]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2023 Jun;45(3):416-421. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.15170.
2
A comparative analysis of deep learning and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms with contrast-enhancement-boost post-processing on the image quality of indirect computed tomography venography of the lower extremities.深度学习与混合迭代重建算法对比分析及其在下肢间接 CT 静脉造影增强后处理中的应用。
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Jul 1;24(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01342-0.
3
Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.深度学习重建和迭代重建在亚毫西弗胸部和腹部 CT 中的图像质量和病变检测。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Mar;214(3):566-573. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21809. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
4
Deep learning image reconstruction for quality assessment of iodine concentration in computed tomography: A phantom study.用于计算机断层扫描中碘浓度质量评估的深度学习图像重建:一项体模研究。
J Xray Sci Technol. 2023;31(2):409-422. doi: 10.3233/XST-221356.
5
Deep learning reconstruction versus iterative reconstruction for cardiac CT angiography in a stroke imaging protocol: reduced radiation dose and improved image quality.在卒中成像方案中,深度学习重建与迭代重建用于心脏CT血管造影的比较:降低辐射剂量并提高图像质量。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Jan;11(1):392-401. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-626.
6
Radiation dose reduction in cardiovascular CT angiography with iterative reconstruction (AIDR 3D) in a swine model: a model of paediatric cardiac imaging.在猪模型中使用迭代重建(AIDR 3D)降低心血管CT血管造影的辐射剂量:一种儿科心脏成像模型
Clin Radiol. 2016 Jul;71(7):716.e7-716.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 May 11.
7
Effects of contrast enhancement boost postprocessing technique in combination with different reconstruction algorithms on the image quality of abdominal CT angiography.增强对比剂后处理技术联合不同重建算法对腹部 CT 血管成像图像质量的影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Sep;154:110388. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110388. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
8
Can deep learning improve image quality of low-dose CT: a prospective study in interstitial lung disease.深度学习能否提高低剂量 CT 图像质量:间质性肺疾病的前瞻性研究。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Dec;32(12):8140-8151. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08870-9. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
9
Effect of a new deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal computed tomography imaging on image quality and dose reduction compared with two iterative reconstruction algorithms: a phantom study.一种用于腹部计算机断层扫描成像的新型深度学习图像重建算法与两种迭代重建算法相比对图像质量和剂量降低的影响:一项体模研究
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Jan;12(1):229-243. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-215.
10
Enhancing image quality in computed tomography angiography follow-ups after endovascular aneurysm repair: a comparative study of reconstruction techniques.增强血管内动脉瘤修复术后 CT 血管造影随访的图像质量:重建技术的对比研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Jul 1;24(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01343-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of different scanning threshold triggers on the image quality of brain computed tomography angiography: a randomized controlled trial.不同扫描阈值触发对脑部计算机断层扫描血管造影图像质量的影响:一项随机对照试验
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):515-523. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-834. Epub 2024 Dec 30.