• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物库与研究同意:英格兰东北部年轻人观点的定性主题分析。

Biobanking and consenting to research: a qualitative thematic analysis of young people's perspectives in the North East of England.

机构信息

Paediatric Immunology, Infectious Diseases & Allergy, Great North Children's Hospital, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jul 5;24(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00925-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-023-00925-w
PMID:37407992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10324191/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biobanking biospecimens and consent are common practice in paediatric research. We need to explore children and young people's (CYP) knowledge and perspectives around the use of and consent to biobanking. This will ensure meaningful informed consent can be obtained and improve current consent procedures.

METHODS

We designed a survey, in co-production with CYP, collecting demographic data, views on biobanking, and consent using three scenarios: 1) prospective consent, 2) deferred consent, and 3) reconsent and assent at age of capacity. The survey was disseminated via the Young Person's Advisory Group North England (YPAGne) and participating CYP's secondary schools. Data were analysed using a qualitative thematic approach by three independent reviewers (including CYP) to identify common themes. Data triangulation occurred independently by a fourth reviewer.

RESULTS

One hundred two CYP completed the survey. Most were between 16-18 years (63.7%, N = 65) and female (66.7%, N = 68). 72.3% had no prior knowledge of biobanking (N = 73). Acceptability of prospective consent for biobanking was high (91.2%, N = 93) with common themes: 'altruism', 'potential benefits outweigh individual risk', 'frugality', and '(in)convenience'. Deferred consent was also deemed acceptable in the large majority (84.3%, N = 86), with common themes: 'altruism', 'body integrity' and 'sample frugality'. 76.5% preferred to reconsent when cognitively mature enough to give assent (N = 78), even if parental consent was previously in place. 79.2% wanted to be informed if their biobanked biospecimen is reused (N = 80).

CONCLUSION

Prospective and deferred consent acceptability for biobanking is high among CYP in the UK. Altruism, frugality, body integrity, and privacy are the most important themes. Clear communication and justification are paramount to obtain consent. Any CYP with capacity should be part of the consenting procedure, if possible.

摘要

背景

生物银行采集生物样本和获得同意是儿科研究中的常见做法。我们需要探讨儿童和青少年(CYP)对生物银行的使用和同意的认识和看法。这将确保能够获得有意义的知情同意,并改进当前的同意程序。

方法

我们与 CYP 共同设计了一项调查,收集人口统计学数据、对生物银行的看法以及使用三种情况(1)前瞻性同意、2)延期同意和 3)达到能力年龄时重新同意和同意的同意,使用三种情况进行同意。该调查通过英格兰北部青年顾问小组(YPAGne)和参与 CYP 的中学进行了传播。数据由三名独立评审员(包括 CYP)使用定性主题方法进行分析,以确定共同主题。数据由第四名评审员独立进行三角剖分。

结果

共有 102 名 CYP 完成了调查。大多数人在 16-18 岁之间(63.7%,N=65),女性(66.7%,N=68)。72.3%(N=73)对生物银行一无所知。前瞻性同意生物银行的接受度很高(91.2%,N=93),常见主题包括:“利他主义”、“潜在利益超过个人风险”、“节俭”和“(不)方便”。在绝大多数情况下(84.3%,N=86),延期同意也被认为是可以接受的,常见主题包括:“利他主义”、“身体完整性”和“样本节俭”。76.5%(N=78)希望在认知成熟到足以给予同意时重新同意,即使之前已经获得了父母的同意。79.2%(N=80)希望在其生物银行生物样本被重新使用时得到通知。

结论

英国 CYP 对生物银行的前瞻性和延期同意接受度很高。利他主义、节俭、身体完整性和隐私是最重要的主题。清晰的沟通和理由至关重要,以获得同意。如果可能的话,任何有能力的 CYP 都应该参与同意程序。

相似文献

1
Biobanking and consenting to research: a qualitative thematic analysis of young people's perspectives in the North East of England.生物库与研究同意:英格兰东北部年轻人观点的定性主题分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jul 5;24(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00925-w.
2
Opinions of Adolescents and Parents About Pediatric Biobanking.青少年和家长对儿科生物库的看法。
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Apr;58(4):474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.12.015.
3
Stakeholder perspectives on the ethico-legal dimensions of biobanking in South Africa.南非生物库伦理法律维度的利益相关者观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 1;22(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00645-z.
4
"As Long as You Ask": A Qualitative Study of Biobanking Consent-Oncology Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Attitudes, Motivations, and Experiences-the B-PPAE Study.“只要你问”:一项关于生物库同意的定性研究——肿瘤患者和医疗保健专业人员的态度、动机和经验——B-PPAE 研究。
Oncologist. 2019 Jun;24(6):844-856. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0233. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
5
Ethical Challenges for Pediatric Biobanks.儿科生物库的伦理挑战。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2021 Apr;19(2):101-105. doi: 10.1089/bio.2020.0116. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
6
Qualitative study of knowledge and attitudes to biobanking among lay persons in Nigeria.尼日利亚普通民众对生物银行的知识和态度的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Oct 16;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-27.
7
"It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.“一切都关乎信任”:研究人员对南非生物样本库相关复杂性与争议的反思
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 10;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0140-2.
8
Opinions of Young Adults on Re-Consenting for Biobanking.年轻人对生物样本库重新同意的看法。
J Pediatr. 2015 Oct;167(4):925-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
9
Ethical considerations for biobanking and use of genomics data in Africa: a narrative review.非洲生物银行和基因组学数据使用的伦理考虑:叙事性综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Dec 5;24(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00985-y.
10
Secondary Use of Patient Tissue in Cancer Biobanks.癌症生物样本库中患者组织的二次使用。
Oncologist. 2019 Dec;24(12):1577-1583. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0376. Epub 2019 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-consent practices in biobanks in Japan: current status and stakeholder perspectives.日本生物样本库中的重新同意做法:现状与利益相关者观点
J Community Genet. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00820-4.
2
Attitudes and awareness in autonomous decision on medical treatment or inclusion in clinical trials amongst Slovenian adolescents: an online survey.斯洛文尼亚青少年在医疗自主决策或参与临床试验方面的态度和意识:一项在线调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1198. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06164-w.

本文引用的文献

1
It is not a big deal: a qualitative study of clinical biobank donation experience and motives.这没什么大不了的:一项关于临床生物库捐赠体验和动机的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 29;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00743-6.
2
Views of university students in Jordan towards Biobanking.约旦大学生对生物库的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Nov 13;22(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00719-y.
3
Adolescent Assent and Reconsent for Biobanking: Recent Developments and Emerging Ethical Issues.青少年对生物样本库的同意与重新同意:最新进展与新出现的伦理问题
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 9;8:686264. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.686264. eCollection 2021.
4
Children and young people's concerns and needs relating to their use of health technology to self-manage long-term conditions: a scoping review.儿童和青少年在使用健康技术自我管理长期疾病方面的关注点和需求:范围综述。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Nov;105(11):1093-1104. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319103. Epub 2020 May 22.
5
Banking the Future: Adolescent Capacity to Consent to Biobank Research.为未来储备:青少年对生物样本库研究的同意能力。
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Jul;41(4):15-22. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500023.
6
Who should decide about children's and adolescents' participation in health research? The views of children and adults in rural Kenya.谁应该决定儿童和青少年参与健康研究?肯尼亚农村地区儿童和成年人的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jun 14;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0375-9.
7
The complex ethical landscape of biobanking.生物样本库复杂的伦理环境。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jun;4(6):e274-e275. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30081-7.
8
The Emergency Medicine Specimen Bank: An Innovative Approach To Biobanking In Acute Care.急诊医学标本库:急性护理中生物库的创新方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):639-647. doi: 10.1111/acem.13620. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
9
Children and young people's participation in developing interventions in health and well-being: a scoping review.儿童和年轻人参与健康与福祉干预措施的制定:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3219-2.
10
Biobanking in the Pediatric Critical Care Setting: Adolescent/Young Adult Perspectives.儿科重症监护环境中的生物样本库:青少年/青年成人视角
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Oct;13(4):391-401. doi: 10.1177/1556264618782231. Epub 2018 Jun 14.