Jorgensen Sarah C J, McIntyre Mark, Curran Jennifer, So Miranda
, PharmD, MPH, is with the Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
, PharmD, is with the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Sinai Health/University Health Network, and the Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Jul 5;76(3):203-208. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.3337. eCollection 2023 Summer.
Little is known about the current landscape of vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in Canadian hospitals, which operate within publicly funded health care systems.
To determine current TDM practices for vancomycin and associated challenges and to gather perceptions about TDM based on area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in Canadian hospitals.
An electronic survey was distributed to hospital pharmacists in spring 2021 through multiple national and provincial antimicrobial stewardship, public health, and pharmacy organizations. The survey gathered data about hospital characteristics, TDM methods, inclusion criteria for patient selection, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets, vancomycin susceptibility testing and reporting, and perceived barriers and challenges.
In total, 120 pharmacists from 10 of the 13 provincial and territorial jurisdictions in Canada, representing 12.5% of Canadian acute care hospitals ( = 962), completed at least 90% of survey questions. The predominant TDM method was trough-based (107/119, 89.9%); another 10.1% of respondents (12/119) reported performing AUC-based TDM (with or without trough-based TDM), and 17.9% (19/106) of those not already using AUC-based TDM were considering implementing it within 1 to 2 years. Among hospitals performing trough-based TDM, 60.5% (66/109) targeted trough levels between 15 and 20 mg/L for serious infections with methicillin-resistant . One-quarter of the respondents using this method (27/109, 24.8%) agreed that trough-based TDM was of uncertain benefit, and about one-third (33/109, 30.3%) were neutral on this question. Multiple challenges were identified for trough-based TDM, including sub- or supra-therapeutic concentrations and collection of specimens at inappropriate times. Overall, 40.5% (47/116) of respondents agreed that AUC-based TDM was likely safer than trough-based TDM, whereas 23.3% (27/116) agreed that AUC-based TDM was likely more effective.
This survey represents a first step in developing evidence-based, standardized best practices for vancomycin TDM that are uniquely suited to the Canadian health care system.
在由公共资金资助的医疗保健系统中运营的加拿大医院里,对于万古霉素治疗药物监测(TDM)的当前情况知之甚少。
确定加拿大医院当前万古霉素TDM的实践情况及相关挑战,并收集基于浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)的关于TDM的看法。
2021年春季,通过多个国家级和省级抗菌药物管理、公共卫生及药学组织,向医院药剂师发放了一份电子调查问卷。该调查收集了有关医院特征、TDM方法、患者选择的纳入标准、药代动力学和药效学目标、万古霉素敏感性测试及报告,以及感知到的障碍和挑战等数据。
来自加拿大13个省和地区中的10个的120名药剂师完成了至少90%的调查问卷问题,这些药剂师代表了加拿大12.5%的急性护理医院(n = 962)。主要的TDM方法是基于谷浓度的(107/119,89.9%);另外10.1%的受访者(12/119)报告进行基于AUC的TDM(无论是否同时进行基于谷浓度的TDM),在尚未使用基于AUC的TDM的受访者中,17.9%(19/106)考虑在1至2年内实施该方法。在进行基于谷浓度TDM的医院中,60.5%(66/109)针对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌严重感染的谷浓度目标为15至20mg/L。使用该方法的受访者中有四分之一(27/109,24.8%)同意基于谷浓度的TDM益处不确定,约三分之一(33/109,30.3%)对此问题持中立态度。基于谷浓度的TDM存在多种挑战,包括治疗浓度以下或以上以及在不适当时间采集标本。总体而言,40.5%(47/116)的受访者同意基于AUC的TDM可能比基于谷浓度的TDM更安全,而23.3%(27/116)同意基于AUC的TDM可能更有效。
本次调查是为万古霉素TDM制定基于证据的、标准化的最佳实践的第一步,这些实践特别适用于加拿大医疗保健系统。