Department of Pharmacy, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Los Angeles County + University of Southern California (LAC+USC) Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 4;72(9):1502-1506. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1743.
In this counterpoint we critically appraise the evidence supporting therapeutic drug monitoring based on the vancomycin 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. We reveal methodologically weaknesses and inconsistencies in the data and suggest that, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence of benefit compared with modestly reducing trough targets, alternative strategies are more likely to result in superior safety and efficacy. These include focusing on fundamental antibiotic stewardship to limit vancomycin exposure overall, achieving earlier and more complete source control, and establishing alternative therapeutic options to vancomycin. Implementation of AUC24-based therapeutic drug monitoring will take resources away from these more promising, alternative solutions.
在这篇反驳文中,我们批判性地评估了基于万古霉素 24 小时浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC24)治疗严重耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的证据。我们揭示了数据在方法学上的弱点和不一致之处,并指出,在没有与适度降低谷值目标相比具有明显和令人信服的益处的证据的情况下,替代策略更有可能导致更高的安全性和疗效。这些策略包括关注基本的抗生素管理,以限制万古霉素的总体暴露,更早、更彻底地控制源头,并建立替代万古霉素的治疗选择。基于 AUC24 的治疗药物监测的实施将从这些更有前途的替代解决方案中获取资源。