Division of Sport, Health, and Exercise Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Department of Engineering, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Exp Physiol. 2023 Sep;108(9):1154-1171. doi: 10.1113/EP091275. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
What is the central question of the study? Ageing is postulated to lead to underperfusion of human limb tissues during passive and exertional hyperthermia, but findings to date have been equivocal. Thus, does age have an independent adverse effect on local haemodynamics during passive single-leg hyperthermia, single-leg knee-extensor exercise and their combination? What is the main finding and its importance? Local hyperthermia increased leg blood flow over three-fold and had an additive effect during knee-extensor exercise with no absolute differences in leg perfusion between the healthy, exercise-trained elderly and the young groups. Our findings indicate that age per se does not compromise lower limb hyperaemia during local hyperthermia and/or small muscle mass exercise.
Heat and exercise therapies are recommended to improve vascular health across the lifespan. However, the haemodynamic effects of hyperthermia, exercise and their combination are inconsistent in young and elderly people. Here we investigated the acute effects of local-limb hyperthermia and exercise on limb haemodynamics in nine healthy, trained elderly (69 ± 5 years) and 10 young (26 ± 7 years) adults, hypothesising that the combination of local hyperthermia and exercise interact to increase leg perfusion, albeit to a lesser extent in the elderly. Participants underwent 90 min of single whole-leg heating, with the contralateral leg remaining as control, followed by 10 min of low-intensity incremental single-leg knee-extensor exercise with both the heated and control legs. Temperature profiles and leg haemodynamics at the femoral and popliteal arteries were measured. In both groups, heating increased whole-leg skin temperature and blood flow by 9.5 ± 1.2°C and 0.7 ± 0.2 L min (>3-fold), respectively (P < 0.0001). Blood flow in the heated leg remained 0.7 ± 0.6 and 1.0 ± 0.8 L min higher during exercise at 6 and 12 W, respectively (P < 0.0001). However, there were no differences in limb haemodynamics between cohorts, other than the elderly group exhibiting a 16 ± 6% larger arterial diameter and a 51 ± 6% lower blood velocity following heating (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, local hyperthermia-induced limb hyperperfusion and/or small muscle mass exercise hyperaemia are preserved in trained older people despite evident age-related structural and functional alterations in their leg conduit arteries.
研究的核心问题是什么?据推测,在被动和用力性发热期间,人体肢体组织会出现灌注不足,但迄今为止的研究结果尚无定论。那么,年龄是否会对被动单腿发热、单腿伸膝运动及其组合期间的局部血液动力学产生独立的不利影响?主要发现及其重要性是什么?局部加热使腿部血液流量增加了三倍以上,并且在伸膝运动时具有附加作用,健康、经过训练的老年人和年轻人组之间的腿部灌注没有绝对差异。我们的研究结果表明,年龄本身不会在局部加热和/或小肌肉质量运动期间损害下肢充血。
热疗和运动疗法被推荐用于改善整个生命周期的血管健康。然而,年轻人和老年人的发热、运动及其组合的血液动力学效应并不一致。在这里,我们研究了局部肢体发热和运动对肢体血液动力学的急性影响,共纳入 9 名健康、训练有素的老年人(69±5 岁)和 10 名年轻人(26±7 岁),假设局部加热和运动的组合会相互作用以增加腿部灌注,尽管在老年人中程度较小。参与者接受了 90 分钟的整个腿部加热,对侧腿部作为对照,然后进行 10 分钟的低强度递增单腿伸膝运动,同时对加热和对照腿部进行运动。测量股动脉和腘动脉的温度曲线和腿部血液动力学。在两组中,加热使整个腿部皮肤温度和血流量分别增加 9.5±1.2°C 和 0.7±0.2 L·min(增加 3 倍以上)(P<0.0001)。在 6 和 12 W 时,运动期间加热腿的血流量仍分别高出 0.7±0.6 和 1.0±0.8 L·min(P<0.0001)。然而,两组之间的肢体血液动力学没有差异,除了老年人组在加热后动脉直径增加 16±6%,血流速度降低 51±6%(P<0.0001)。总之,尽管老年人的腿部输送动脉存在明显的与年龄相关的结构和功能改变,但训练有素的老年人在局部发热引起的肢体充血和/或小肌肉质量运动充血方面得到了保留。