School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Department of Health, Aging & Society, Faculty of Social Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jun;46(13):2808-2820. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2232293. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
To prioritize and achieve consensus on mobility determinant factors [cognitive, financial, environmental, personal, physical, psychological, social] considered critical to include in the mprehensive obility ischarge ssessment ramework (COMDAF) for older adults transitioning from hospital-to-home.
We conducted a three-round modified e-Delphi process with 60 international experts (seven older adults, nine family caregivers, 24 clinicians, and 20 researchers) from nine countries with universal or near-universal health coverage. Expert members rated 91 factors identified from scoping reviews using a 9-point scale: not important (1-3), important (4-6), and critical (7-9).
A total of 41 of 91 factors (45.1%) met the a-priori consensus criterion after three rounds: five cognitive, five environmental, two personal, 19 physical, six psychological, and six social factors. No financial factors reached a consensus. The older adult steering committee member recommended the addition of two environmental factors, resulting in 43 mobility factors included in the COMDAF.
We advanced a comprehensive mobility framework by developing, through consensus, 43 mobility factors to be assessed as part of a COMDAF. However, its use in hospital-to-home may not be feasible. Therefore, future research will determine the core mobility factors for COMDAF and which measurement instruments best measure these factors.
An interdisciplinary discharge rehabilitation team can utilize the COMDAF during hospital-to-home transition.Implications for rehabilitationMobility assessment following a hospital discharge is a complex process requiring an interdisciplinary discharge rehabilitation team.This study provided a comprehensive list of 91 factors across all seven mobility determinants (cognitive, environmental, financial, personal, physical, psychological, and social) for clinicians in other care settings to use as a starting point to determine which mobility factor should be assessed during older adults' hospital-to-home transition.This international e-Delphi study identified 43 factors within mobility determinants (cognitive, environmental, personal, physical, psychological, and social) to be included in a Comprehensive Mobility Discharge Assessment Framework to assess older adults' mobility during the hospital to home transition.Using these 43 factors, clinicians can identify which assessment tool is best suited to assess the factors while reflecting on the logistics and feasibility; this is the next phase of this project.
确定和达成共识,明确与认知、财务、环境、个人、身体、心理、社会等方面有关的移动决定因素,这些因素对于包含在老年人从医院到家庭过渡的综合移动出院评估框架(COMDAF)中至关重要。
我们与来自 9 个国家/地区的 60 名国际专家(7 名老年人、9 名家庭护理人员、24 名临床医生和 20 名研究人员)进行了三轮修改后的电子德尔菲法,这些国家/地区均提供全民或近乎全民健康覆盖。专家成员使用 9 分制对来自范围综述确定的 91 个因素进行评分:不重要(1-3)、重要(4-6)和关键(7-9)。
三轮过后,共有 41 个(45.1%)因素达到了事先设定的共识标准:五个认知、五个环境、两个个人、19 个身体、六个心理和六个社会因素。没有财务因素达成共识。老年人指导委员会成员建议增加两个环境因素,因此在 COMDAF 中包含了 43 个移动因素。
我们通过达成共识,制定了 43 个移动因素,以作为 COMDAF 的一部分进行评估,从而推进了全面的移动框架。然而,其在从医院到家庭的过渡中的应用可能不可行。因此,未来的研究将确定 COMDAF 的核心移动因素以及哪些测量工具最能衡量这些因素。
跨学科出院康复团队可以在从医院到家庭的过渡期间使用 COMDAF。
出院后进行移动评估是一个复杂的过程,需要跨学科的出院康复团队。
本研究为其他护理环境中的临床医生提供了一份全面的清单,其中包含了 91 个与所有七个移动决定因素(认知、环境、财务、个人、身体、心理和社会)相关的因素,作为确定老年人从医院到家庭过渡期间应评估哪些移动因素的起点。
这项国际性的电子德尔菲研究确定了移动决定因素(认知、环境、个人、身体、心理和社会)中的 43 个因素,以纳入综合移动出院评估框架,以评估老年人在从医院到家庭的过渡期间的移动能力。
使用这 43 个因素,临床医生可以确定哪种评估工具最适合评估这些因素,同时考虑到后勤和可行性;这是该项目的下一阶段。