Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2321929. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21929.
Tailored treatments for low back pain (LBP) based on stratifying risk for poor prognosis have emerged as a promising approach to improve quality of care, but they have not been validated in trials at the level of individual randomization in US health systems.
To assess the clinical effectiveness of risk-stratified vs usual care on disability at 1 year among patients with LBP.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This parallel-group randomized clinical trial enrolled adults (ages 18-50 years) seeking care for LBP with any duration in primary care clinics within the Military Health System from April 2017 to February 2020. Data analysis was conducted from January to December 2022.
Risk-stratified care, in which participants received physiotherapy treatment tailored for their risk category (low, medium, or high), or usual care, in which care was determined by participants' general practitioners and may have included a referral to physiotherapy.
The primary outcome was the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score at 1 year, with planned secondary outcomes of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) and Physical Function (PF) scores. Raw downstream health care utilization was also reported within each group.
Analysis included 270 participants (99 [34.1%] female participants; mean [SD] age, 34.1 [8.5] years). Only 21 patients (7.2%) were classified as high risk. Neither group was superior on the RMDQ (least squares [LS] mean ratio of risk-stratified vs usual care: 1.00; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.26), the PROMIS PI (LS mean difference, -0.75 points; 95% CI -2.61 to 1.11 points), or the PROMIS PF (LS mean difference, 0.05 points; 95% CI, -1.66 to 1.76 points).
In this randomized clinical trial, using risk stratification to categorize and provide tailored treatment for patients with LBP did not result in better outcomes at 1 year compared with usual care.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03127826.
基于预后不良风险分层的量身定制的腰痛 (LBP) 治疗方法已成为改善护理质量的有前途的方法,但尚未在美国卫生系统的个体随机化水平的试验中得到验证。
评估 LBP 患者接受风险分层与常规护理在 1 年时残疾的临床效果。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项平行组随机临床试验,招募了在军事医疗系统中的初级保健诊所中因任何持续时间的 LBP 寻求治疗的成年人(18-50 岁)。数据分析于 2022 年 1 月至 12 月进行。
风险分层护理,参与者接受根据其风险类别(低、中或高)量身定制的物理治疗;常规护理,护理由参与者的全科医生决定,可能包括转诊到物理治疗。
主要结果是 1 年时的 Roland Morris 残疾问卷 (RMDQ) 评分,计划的次要结果是患者报告的结局测量信息系统 (PROMIS) 疼痛干扰 (PI) 和身体功能 (PF) 评分。还报告了每组内的原始下游卫生保健利用率。
分析包括 270 名参与者(99 名[34.1%]女性参与者;平均[标准差]年龄 34.1[8.5]岁)。只有 21 名患者(7.2%)被归类为高风险。两组在 RMDQ 上均无优势(风险分层与常规护理的最小二乘 [LS] 均值比:1.00;95%CI,0.80 至 1.26)、PROMIS PI(LS 均值差值,-0.75 分;95%CI,-2.61 至 1.11 分)或 PROMIS PF(LS 均值差值,0.05 分;95%CI,-1.66 至 1.76 分)。
在这项随机临床试验中,使用风险分层对 LBP 患者进行分类并提供量身定制的治疗并未在 1 年时产生优于常规护理的结果。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03127826。