Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Sep;20(9):1326-1336. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-083OC.
Loss of pharyngeal dilator muscle activity is a key determinant of respiratory events in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). After the withdrawal of wakefulness stimuli to the genioglossus at sleep onset, mechanoreceptor negative pressure and chemoreceptor ventilatory drive feedback govern genioglossus activation during sleep, but the relative contributions of drive and pressure stimuli to genioglossus activity across progressive obstructive events remain unclear. We recently showed that drive typically falls during events, whereas negative pressures increase, providing a means to assess their individual contributions to the time course of genioglossus activity. For the first time, we critically test whether the loss of drive could explain the loss of genioglossus activity observed within events in OSA. We examined the time course of genioglossus activity (EMGgg; intramuscular electromyography), ventilatory drive (intraesophageal diaphragm electromyography), and esophageal pressure during spontaneous respiratory events (using the ensemble-average method) in 42 patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index 5-91 events/h). Multivariable regression demonstrated that the falling-then-rising time course of EMGgg may be well explained by falling-then-rising drive and rising negative pressure stimuli (model = 0.91 [0.88-0.98] [95% confidence interval]). Overall, EMGgg was 2.9-fold (0.47-∞) more closely associated with drive than pressure stimuli (ratio of standardized coefficients, β:β; ∞ denotes absent pressure contribution). However, individual patient results were heterogeneous: approximately one-half ( = 22 of 42) exhibited drive-dominant responses (i.e., β:β > 2:1), and one-quarter ( = 11 of 42) exhibited pressure-dominant EMGgg responses (i.e., β:β < 1:2). Patients exhibiting more drive-dominant EMGgg responses experienced greater event-related EMGgg declines (12.9 [4.8-21.0] %/standard deviation of β:β; = 0.004, adjusted analysis). Loss of genioglossus activity precipitating events in patients with OSA is strongly associated with a contemporaneous loss of drive and is greatest in those whose activity tracks drive rather than pressure stimuli. These findings were upheld for events without prior arousal. Responding to falling drive rather than rising negative pressure during events may be deleterious; future therapeutic strategies whose aim is to sustain genioglossus activity by preferentially enhancing responses to rising pressure rather than falling drive are of interest.
咽缩肌活动的丧失是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)中呼吸事件的关键决定因素。在睡眠起始时对颏舌肌的觉醒刺激撤回后,机械感受器负压和化学感受器通气驱动反馈在睡眠期间控制颏舌肌的激活,但驱动和压力刺激对颏舌肌活动在进行性阻塞事件中的相对贡献仍不清楚。我们最近表明,在事件期间驱动通常下降,而负压增加,为评估它们对颏舌肌活动时间过程的单独贡献提供了一种手段。我们首次批判性地检验了在 OSA 中观察到的事件内驱动丧失是否可以解释颏舌肌活动的丧失。我们使用集合平均方法检查了 42 例 OSA 患者(呼吸暂停-低通气指数 5-91 次/小时)在自发性呼吸事件期间的颏舌肌活动(肌内颏舌肌肌电图)、通气驱动(食管内膈肌肌电图)和食管压力的时间过程。多变量回归表明,EMGgg 的下降-然后上升的时间过程可以很好地用下降-然后上升的驱动和上升的负压刺激来解释(模型=0.91 [0.88-0.98] [95%置信区间])。总的来说,EMGgg 与驱动的相关性比压力刺激强 2.9 倍(标准化系数比,β:β;∞表示不存在压力贡献)。然而,个别患者的结果存在异质性:大约一半( = 42 例中的 22 例)表现出驱动主导的反应(即β:β > 2:1),四分之一( = 42 例中的 11 例)表现出压力主导的 EMGgg 反应(即β:β < 1:2)。表现出更驱动主导的 EMGgg 反应的患者经历了更大的与事件相关的 EMGgg 下降(12.9 [4.8-21.0]%/β:β的标准差; = 0.004,调整分析)。OSA 患者中引发事件的颏舌肌活动丧失与同时发生的驱动丧失密切相关,在那些活动与驱动而非压力刺激相关的患者中最为明显。这些发现适用于没有先前觉醒的事件。在事件中对下降的驱动而不是上升的负压做出反应可能是有害的;未来的治疗策略旨在通过优先增强对上升压力的反应而不是下降的驱动来维持颏舌肌的活动,这是很有意义的。