• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将使用粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)进行粪便血红蛋白测量纳入结直肠症状患者的转诊、分诊和优先排序流程。

Incorporating faecal haemoglobin measurement using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the referral, triage and prioritisation pathway for patients with colorectal symptoms.

作者信息

Falvey James, Frampton Christopher M A, Gearry Richard B, Hudson Ben, Whiteley Lucinda

机构信息

Gastroenterologist, Department of Gastroenterology, Christchurch Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha, Christchurch.

Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch Campus, Christchurch.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2023 Jul 7;136(1578):55-76. doi: 10.26635/6965.5966.

DOI:10.26635/6965.5966
PMID:37414077
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Incorporating faecal haemoglobin (FHb) measurement using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the investigation pathway for patients with colorectal symptoms may improve access to colonoscopy for those at greatest risk of significant disease.

AIM

To derive a colorectal symptom pathway incorporating standard clinical and FIT data to guide referral, triage, and prioritisation of cases in New Zealand.

METHOD

Diagnostic accuracy of FIT to rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) was determined by meta-analysis. Thereafter, the risk of CRC after FIT was estimated for common clinical presentations by Bayesian methodology, using a specifically collated retrospective cohort of symptomatic cases. A symptom/FIT pathway was developed iteratively following multi-disciplinary engagement.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in meta-analysis. The sensitivity and specificity for CRC were 89.0% (95%CI 87.0-90.9%) and 80.1% (95%CI 77.7-82.4%) respectively, at a FHb threshold of >10mcg haemoglobin per gram stool, and 95.7% (95%CI 93.2-97.7%) and 60.5% (95%CI 53.8-67.0%) respectively, at the limit of detection. The final pathway was 97% sensitive for CRC, compared with 90% for the current direct access criteria, and requires 47% fewer colonoscopies. Estimated prevalence of CRC among those declined investigation was 0.23%.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating FIT in the new patient symptomatic pathway as presented appears feasible, safe, and allows for resources to be targeted to those at greatest risk of disease. Further work is needed to ensure equity for Māori if this pathway were introduced nationally.

摘要

未标注

在结直肠症状患者的检查流程中纳入使用粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)测量粪便血红蛋白(FHb),可能会改善那些患重大疾病风险最高的患者接受结肠镜检查的机会。

目的

制定一个结合标准临床和FIT数据的结直肠症状检查流程,以指导新西兰病例的转诊、分诊和优先级排序。

方法

通过荟萃分析确定FIT排除结直肠癌(CRC)的诊断准确性。此后,使用专门整理的有症状病例回顾性队列,通过贝叶斯方法估计常见临床表现患者FIT检测后患CRC的风险。经过多学科参与,迭代制定了症状/FIT检查流程。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了18项研究。当粪便血红蛋白阈值>10微克/克粪便时,CRC的敏感性和特异性分别为89.0%(95%CI 87.0 - 90.9%)和80.1%(95%CI 77.7 - 82.4%);在检测限处,敏感性和特异性分别为95.7%(95%CI 93.2 - 97.7%)和60.5%(95%CI 53.8 - 67.0%)。最终的检查流程对CRC的敏感性为97%,而当前直接就诊标准的敏感性为90%,所需结肠镜检查减少47%。估计拒绝检查的患者中CRC患病率为0.23%。

结论

将FIT纳入所提出的新的患者症状检查流程似乎是可行、安全的,并且能够将资源用于那些疾病风险最高的患者。如果在全国范围内引入该检查流程,还需要进一步努力确保毛利人的公平性。

相似文献

1
Incorporating faecal haemoglobin measurement using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the referral, triage and prioritisation pathway for patients with colorectal symptoms.将使用粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)进行粪便血红蛋白测量纳入结直肠症状患者的转诊、分诊和优先排序流程。
N Z Med J. 2023 Jul 7;136(1578):55-76. doi: 10.26635/6965.5966.
2
Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) based prioritisation of new patient symptomatic cases referred for colorectal investigation.基于粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的新患者症状性病例优先分级,这些病例被转介进行结直肠检查。
N Z Med J. 2024 Sep 6;137(1602):102-110. doi: 10.26635/6965.6582.
3
Faecal immunochemical tests to triage patients with lower abdominal symptoms for suspected colorectal cancer referrals in primary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.粪便免疫化学检测用于在初级保健中对有下腹部症状的患者进行分流,以确定是否需要转诊疑似结直肠癌患者:一项系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 May;21(33):1-234. doi: 10.3310/hta21330.
4
High-risk symptoms and quantitative faecal immunochemical test accuracy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.高危症状与定量粪便免疫化学检测的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 May 21;25(19):2383-2401. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i19.2383.
5
Introduction of an integrated primary care faecal immunochemical test referral pathway for patients with suspected colorectal cancer symptoms.引入一种整合的初级保健粪便免疫化学检测转诊途径,用于疑似结直肠癌症状的患者。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Dec;24(12):1526-1534. doi: 10.1111/codi.16294. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
6
Impact of faecal haemoglobin based triage of bowel symptoms presenting to primary care on colorectal cancer diagnosis.基于粪便血红蛋白的初级保健中肠道症状分诊对结直肠癌诊断的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Apr;25(4):787-793. doi: 10.1111/codi.16451. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
7
Combining the quantitative faecal immunochemical test and full blood count reliably rules out colorectal cancer in a symptomatic patient referral pathway.定量粪便免疫化学检测与全血细胞计数联合应用可在有症状患者就诊途径中可靠排除结直肠癌。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Feb;37(2):457-466. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04079-2. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
8
Faecal immunochemical test is superior to symptoms in predicting pathology in patients with suspected colorectal cancer symptoms referred on a 2WW pathway: a diagnostic accuracy study.粪便免疫化学试验在预测疑似结直肠癌症状患者的病理方面优于症状,这些患者通过 2WW 途径转诊:一项诊断准确性研究。
Gut. 2021 Jun;70(6):1130-1138. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321956. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
Faecal immunochemical testing and blood tests for prioritization of urgent colorectal cancer referrals in symptomatic patients: a 2-year evaluation.粪便免疫化学检测和血液检测在有症状患者中对紧急结直肠癌转诊的优先排序:为期 2 年的评估。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa056.
10
Comparison of the QuikRead go point-of-care faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin with the FOB Gold Wide laboratory analyser to diagnose colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients.比较 QuikRead go 即时护理粪便免疫化学试验血红蛋白与 FOB Gold Wide 实验室分析仪,以诊断有症状患者的结直肠癌。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Oct 25;60(1):101-108. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0655. Print 2022 Jan 26.