• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同体育活动水平和运动表现对中国体育院校学生动态下肢平衡评估准确性的影响。

The influence of different levels of physical activity and sports performance on the accuracy of dynamic lower limbs balance assessment among Chinese physical education college students.

作者信息

Huang Xuejuan, Yan Zhiyang, Ma Yong, Liu Hua

机构信息

Department of Sports Engineering and Information Technology, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China.

Research Center of Sports Equipment Engineering Technology of Hubei Province, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2023 Jun 21;14:1184340. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1184340. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fphys.2023.1184340
PMID:37415907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10319993/
Abstract

Balance ability is the basis of human actions. Improving the accuracy of dynamic balance assessment can increase the efficiency of sports injury prediction. This study aimed to investigate how physical activity and sports performance affect the dynamic balance ability of lower limbs and validate whether the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ) is a reliable predictor of sports injury risk among Chinese physical education college students. In total, 169 voluntary participants completed the YBT-LQ at the beginning of a semester and provided some physiological information and an injury report at the end of the semester. The correlation between YBT-LQ performance and selected factors that can affect the dynamic balance control was analyzed based on data statistics. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and the area under curve (AUC) of the composite scores of the YBT-LQ were calculated to explore an optimal cutoff value for predicting sports injury risk. The composite scores of the YBT-LQ exhibited strong correlations with both the sports performance level and sports injury, as well as a moderate correlation with physical activity level, age (negative), and metabolic equivalent (MET). In the entire study population, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the binary classification of composite YBT-LQ scores of the left and right legs to predict sports injury risk were 0.78 and 0.74, respectively. Stratifying the study participants based on their levels of physical activity and sports performance had an effect on the AUC values of ROC curves. The optimal cutoff scores of the YBT-LQ for predicting sports injury risk were variable, with values more or less than 95%. Specifically, the cutoff scores for participants with the highest level of sports performance were notably higher, reaching up to 106.5% (left) and 107.2% (right). Physical activity and sports performance can influence human dynamic balance control. Composite scores of the YBT-LQ can be used with acceptable efficiency to predict sports injury. Stratifying participants based on their levels of physical activity and sports performance leads to different optimal cutoff values of the YBT-LQ composite scores in predicting sports injury. This approach is preferable to relying solely on a uniform 95% cutoff. It is recommended to analyze individuals with higher levels of sports performance, such as elite athletes, separately from those with lower levels. This is because the former group has a higher optimal cutoff value compared to the latter.

摘要

平衡能力是人类行动的基础。提高动态平衡评估的准确性可以提高运动损伤预测的效率。本研究旨在探讨身体活动和运动表现如何影响下肢的动态平衡能力,并验证下肢Y平衡测试(YBT-LQ)是否是中国体育专业大学生运动损伤风险的可靠预测指标。共有169名自愿参与者在学期开始时完成了YBT-LQ测试,并在学期结束时提供了一些生理信息和一份损伤报告。基于数据统计分析了YBT-LQ表现与可能影响动态平衡控制的选定因素之间的相关性。计算YBT-LQ综合得分的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC),以探索预测运动损伤风险的最佳临界值。YBT-LQ的综合得分与运动表现水平和运动损伤均呈现出强相关性,与身体活动水平、年龄(负相关)和代谢当量(MET)呈现出中度相关性。在整个研究人群中,用于预测运动损伤风险的左右腿YBT-LQ综合得分二元分类的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积分别为0.78和0.74。根据参与者的身体活动水平和运动表现水平对研究对象进行分层,会对ROC曲线的AUC值产生影响。YBT-LQ预测运动损伤风险的最佳临界分数是可变的,数值或多或少低于95%。具体而言,运动表现水平最高的参与者的临界分数明显更高,分别高达106.5%(左)和107.2%(右)。身体活动和运动表现会影响人体动态平衡控制。YBT-LQ的综合得分可以以可接受的效率用于预测运动损伤。根据参与者的身体活动水平和运动表现水平进行分层,会导致YBT-LQ综合得分在预测运动损伤时有不同的最佳临界值。这种方法比单纯依赖统一的95%临界值更可取。建议将运动表现水平较高的个体(如精英运动员)与运动表现水平较低的个体分开分析。这是因为与后者相比,前者的最佳临界值更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/2d8567c05508/fphys-14-1184340-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/eb10a2c67f77/fphys-14-1184340-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/49025dea3a9e/fphys-14-1184340-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/f0988a6fa9d3/fphys-14-1184340-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/b823c8e3d9f9/fphys-14-1184340-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/85118a179be0/fphys-14-1184340-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/2d8567c05508/fphys-14-1184340-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/eb10a2c67f77/fphys-14-1184340-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/49025dea3a9e/fphys-14-1184340-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/f0988a6fa9d3/fphys-14-1184340-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/b823c8e3d9f9/fphys-14-1184340-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/85118a179be0/fphys-14-1184340-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9221/10319993/2d8567c05508/fphys-14-1184340-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of different levels of physical activity and sports performance on the accuracy of dynamic lower limbs balance assessment among Chinese physical education college students.不同体育活动水平和运动表现对中国体育院校学生动态下肢平衡评估准确性的影响。
Front Physiol. 2023 Jun 21;14:1184340. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1184340. eCollection 2023.
2
Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test Scores and Lower Extremity Injury in NCAA Division I Athletes.美国大学体育协会(NCAA)一级联盟运动员的下肢Y平衡测试分数与下肢损伤
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Aug 8;5(8):2325967117723666. doi: 10.1177/2325967117723666. eCollection 2017 Aug.
3
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Y-Balance Test Lower Quarter: Reliability, Discriminant Validity, and Predictive Validity.Y平衡测试下半身的系统评价与Meta分析:信度、区分效度和预测效度
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Oct 1;16(5):1190-1209. doi: 10.26603/001c.27634. eCollection 2021.
4
Limb Dominance Does Not Affect Y-Balance Test Performance in Non-Athlete Adolescents.肢体优势不影响非运动员青少年的Y平衡测试表现。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Feb 1;17(2):164-173. doi: 10.26603/001c.30996. eCollection 2022.
5
COMPARISON of LOWER QUARTER Y-BALANCE TEST SCORES for FEMALE COLLEGIATE VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS BASED on COMPETITION LEVEL, POSITION, and STARTER STATUS.基于比赛水平、位置和首发状态的女子大学排球运动员下肢Y平衡测试分数比较
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jun;14(3):415-423. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20190415.
6
Differences in dynamic balance scores in one sport versus multiple sport high school athletes.单项运动与多项运动的高中运动员在动态平衡得分上的差异。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;7(2):148-53.
7
Y-Balance Test Performance Does Not Determine Non-Contact Lower Quadrant Injury in Collegiate American Football Players.Y平衡测试表现不能判定美国大学橄榄球运动员的非接触性下半身损伤。
Sports (Basel). 2020 Feb 27;8(3):27. doi: 10.3390/sports8030027.
8
Predicting Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test Performance From Foot Characteristics.根据足部特征预测下半身Y平衡测试表现
J Sport Rehabil. 2020 Feb 5;30(1):16-21. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0358.
9
Clinical Implications of Hand Position and Lower Limb Length Measurement Method on Y-Balance Test Scores and Interpretations.手的位置和下肢长度测量方法对 Y 平衡测试评分及其解读的临床意义。
J Athl Train. 2017 Oct;52(10):910-917. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.8.02. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
10
SCORING PERFORMANCE VARIATIONS BETWEEN THE Y-BALANCE TEST, A MODIFIED Y-BALANCE TEST, AND THE MODIFIED STAR EXCURSION BALANCE TEST.Y平衡测试、改良Y平衡测试和改良星标偏移平衡测试之间的评分表现差异
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Feb;15(1):34-41.

本文引用的文献

1
Knee extensor force control as a predictor of dynamic balance in healthy adults.膝关节伸肌力量控制作为健康成年人动态平衡的预测指标。
Gait Posture. 2023 Feb;100:230-235. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
2
Advancing age is associated with more impaired mediolateral balance control after step down task.随着年龄增长,在进行下台阶任务后,个体的内外侧平衡控制能力会出现更多受损情况。
Gait Posture. 2023 Feb;100:165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.12.009. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
3
Limb Dominance Does Not Affect Y-Balance Test Performance in Non-Athlete Adolescents.
肢体优势不影响非运动员青少年的Y平衡测试表现。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Feb 1;17(2):164-173. doi: 10.26603/001c.30996. eCollection 2022.
4
New evidence on COVID-19 and firm performance.关于新冠病毒病与企业业绩的新证据。
Econ Anal Policy. 2021 Dec;72:213-225. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
The Dose-Response Relationships of Different Dimensions of Physical Activity with Daily Physical Function and Cognitive Function in Chinese Adults with Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study.不同维度的身体活动与中国高血压成年人日常身体功能和认知功能的剂量-反应关系:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 2;18(23):12698. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312698.
6
The association between Y-balance test scores, injury, and physical performance in elite adolescent Australian footballers.青少年精英澳式足球运动员的 Y 平衡测试评分、损伤与身体表现之间的关联。
J Sci Med Sport. 2022 Apr;25(4):306-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.10.014. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
Predicting Upper Quadrant Musculoskeletal Injuries in the Military: A Cohort Study.预测军事人员上象限肌肉骨骼损伤:队列研究。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 Feb 1;54(2):337-344. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002789.
8
Can the Y balance test identify those at risk of contact or non-contact lower extremity injury in adolescent and collegiate Gaelic games?Y 平衡测试能否识别出青少年和大学生盖尔式运动中接触性或非接触性下肢损伤的风险?
J Sci Med Sport. 2020 Oct;23(10):943-948. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.04.017. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
9
Y balance test: Are we doing it right?Y 平衡测试:我们做对了吗?
J Sci Med Sport. 2020 Feb;23(2):194-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.09.016. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
10
Quick and Simple FRAIL Scale Predicts Incident Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental ADL (IADL) Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.快速简易衰弱量表预测日常活动(ADL)和工具性日常活动(IADL)残疾的发生:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Dec;19(12):1063-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.07.019. Epub 2018 Sep 8.