Marti Louis, Wu Shengyi, Piantadosi Steven T, Kidd Celeste
University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Mar 9;7:79-92. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00072. eCollection 2023.
Many social and legal conflicts hinge on semantic disagreements. Understanding the origins and implications of these disagreements necessitates novel methods for identifying and quantifying variation in semantic cognition between individuals. We collected conceptual similarity ratings and feature judgements from a variety of words in two domains. We analyzed this data using a non-parametric clustering scheme, as well as an ecological statistical estimator, in order to infer the number of different variants of common concepts that exist in the population. Our results show at least ten to thirty quantifiably different variants of word meanings exist for even common nouns. Further, people are unaware of this variation, and exhibit a strong bias to erroneously believe that other people share their semantics. This highlights conceptual factors that likely interfere with productive political and social discourse.
许多社会和法律冲突都取决于语义上的分歧。理解这些分歧的起源和影响需要新的方法来识别和量化个体之间语义认知的差异。我们从两个领域的各种词汇中收集了概念相似性评级和特征判断。我们使用非参数聚类方案以及生态统计估计器对这些数据进行分析,以推断人群中存在的常见概念的不同变体数量。我们的结果表明,即使是普通名词,也至少存在十到三十种可量化的不同词义变体。此外,人们并未意识到这种差异,并且表现出强烈的偏见,错误地认为其他人与自己的语义相同。这凸显了可能干扰有效政治和社会话语的概念因素。