• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围手术期共同决策制定——我们如何培训临床医生?

Perioperative shared decision making - How do we train clinicians?

作者信息

Bougeard Anne-Marie, Nair Ashwati, Santhirapala Ramai

机构信息

ST7 Anaesthesia, University Hospitals Plymouth, UK.

Fifth Year Medical Student, GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, UK.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2023 Jun 19;3:100181. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100181. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100181
PMID:37416622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10320377/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Decision making about high-risk surgery can be complex, particularly when outcomes may be uncertain. Clinicians have a legal and ethical responsibility to support decision making which fits with patients' values and preferences. In the UK, preoperative assessment and optimisation is led by Anaesthetists in clinic several weeks prior to planned surgery. Training in supporting shared decision making (SDM) has been identified as an area of need among UK anaesthetists with leadership roles in perioperative care.

METHODS

We describe adaptation of a generic SDM workshop to perioperative care, in particular to decisions on high-risk surgery, and its delivery to UK healthcare professionals over a two-year period. Feedback from workshops were thematically analysed. We explored further improvements to the workshop and ideas for development and dissemination.

RESULTS

The workshops were well received, with high satisfaction for techniques used, including video demonstrations, role-play and discussions. Thematic analysis identified a desire for multidisciplinary training and training in using patient aids.

CONCLUSION

Qualitative findings suggest workshops were considered useful with perceived improvement in SDM awareness, skills and reflective practice.

INNOVATION

This pilot introduces a new modality of training in the perioperative setting providing physicians, particularly Anaesthetists, with previously unavailable training needed to facilitate complex discussions.

摘要

目的

高风险手术的决策可能很复杂,尤其是当结果不确定时。临床医生有法律和道德责任支持符合患者价值观和偏好的决策。在英国,术前评估和优化由麻醉师在计划手术前几周的门诊中主导。支持共同决策(SDM)的培训已被确定为在围手术期护理中担任领导角色的英国麻醉师的一个需求领域。

方法

我们描述了一个通用的SDM研讨会如何适应围手术期护理,特别是关于高风险手术的决策,以及在两年时间内向英国医疗保健专业人员提供该研讨会的情况。对研讨会的反馈进行了主题分析。我们探讨了对该研讨会的进一步改进以及开发和传播的想法。

结果

这些研讨会受到好评,对所使用的技术,包括视频演示、角色扮演和讨论,满意度很高。主题分析确定了对多学科培训和使用患者辅助工具培训的需求。

结论

定性研究结果表明,这些研讨会被认为是有用的,在SDM意识、技能和反思性实践方面有明显改善。

创新

这项试点在围手术期环境中引入了一种新的培训方式,为医生,特别是麻醉师提供了促进复杂讨论所需的以前无法获得的培训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ab8/10320377/90d8a8eaba5b/fx4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ab8/10320377/bc45b9bb5257/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ab8/10320377/50d4e7931713/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ab8/10320377/9e740f239b30/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ab8/10320377/90d8a8eaba5b/fx4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ab8/10320377/bc45b9bb5257/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ab8/10320377/50d4e7931713/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ab8/10320377/9e740f239b30/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ab8/10320377/90d8a8eaba5b/fx4.jpg

相似文献

1
Perioperative shared decision making - How do we train clinicians?围手术期共同决策制定——我们如何培训临床医生?
PEC Innov. 2023 Jun 19;3:100181. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100181. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
2
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
3
Patients' and healthcare professionals' perceived facilitators and barriers for shared decision-making for frail and elderly patients in perioperative care: a scoping review.患者和医疗保健专业人员对衰弱和老年患者围手术期护理中共同决策的感知促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 24;23(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09120-4.
4
Development and pilot testing of an online case-based approach to shared decision making skills training for clinicians.针对临床医生的基于案例的在线共同决策技能培训方法的开发与试点测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Nov 1;14:95. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-95.
5
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
6
Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.实现参与:一项关于全科医疗中共同决策技能培养及风险沟通辅助工具使用的整群随机试验的过程结果
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):337-46. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh401.
7
GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in shared decision-making training: a qualitative study.全科医生对共享决策培训中教学方法的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Mar 30;73(729):e310-e317. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0194. Print 2023 Apr.
8
Practices and perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on shared decision-making in nephrology.肾病学中患者和医疗保健专业人员共同决策的实践和观点。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Jul 21;23(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02887-4.
9
10
Evaluation of an advance care planning training program for practice professionals in Japan incorporating shared decision making skills training: a prospective study of a curricular intervention.评估日本实践专业人员的预先护理计划培训计划,纳入共同决策技能培训:课程干预的前瞻性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jul 26;21(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01019-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of peri-operative frailty and operative stress on post-discharge mortality, readmission and days at home in Medicare beneficiaries.围手术期虚弱和手术应激对 Medicare 受益人的出院后死亡率、再入院率和在家天数的影响。
Anaesthesia. 2024 Aug;79(8):829-838. doi: 10.1111/anae.16301. Epub 2024 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding decision making about major surgery: protocol for a qualitative study of shared decision making by high-risk patients and their clinical teams.理解重大手术决策:一项关于高危患者及其临床团队共同决策的定性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 May 5;10(5):e033703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033703.
2
Improving Shared Decision Making Between Patients and Clinicians: Design and Development of a Virtual Patient Simulation Tool.改善患者与临床医生之间的共同决策:虚拟患者模拟工具的设计与开发。
JMIR Med Educ. 2018 Nov 6;4(2):e10088. doi: 10.2196/10088.
3
Impact of decision aids used during clinical encounters on clinician outcomes and consultation length: a systematic review.
临床医患沟通中使用决策辅助工具对临床医生结局和咨询时长的影响:系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jun;28(6):499-510. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008022. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
4
A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process.一种用于共同决策的三阶段谈话模型:多阶段咨询过程。
BMJ. 2017 Nov 6;359:j4891. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4891.
5
A survey of UK peri-operative medicine: pre-operative care.英国围手术期医学调查:术前护理。
Anaesthesia. 2017 Aug;72(8):1010-1015. doi: 10.1111/anae.13934. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme.在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中实施共同决策:来自MAGIC项目的经验教训。
BMJ. 2017 Apr 18;357:j1744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1744.
7
A systematic process for creating and appraising clinical vignettes to illustrate interprofessional shared decision making.一个用于创建和评估临床案例以说明跨专业共同决策的系统过程。
J Interprof Care. 2014 Sep;28(5):453-9. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.911157. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
8
Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.开发和评估通用 ACS NSQIP 手术风险计算器:为患者和外科医生提供的决策辅助和知情同意工具。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;217(5):833-42.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.385. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
9
Interprofessional SDM train-the-trainer program "Fit for SDM": provider satisfaction and impact on participation.跨专业 SDM 培训师培训项目“Fit for SDM”:提供者满意度及其对参与度的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 May 28.
10
Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.共同决策:一种临床实践模式。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 May 23.