Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Naval Aviation University, Yantai, Shandong, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 7;102(27):e34254. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034254.
In this study, a meta-analysis system was used to evaluate the effects of 7 methods of treating sarcopenia, including resistance exercise, aerobic exercise, mixed exercise, nutrition, resistance combined with nutrition, mixed exercise combined with nutrition, and electric stimulation combined with nutrition, and their effects on physical function.
According to the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and other foreign databases, as well as Chinese databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wan Fang, the literatures of randomized controlled trials with different intervention measures were searched. ADDIS software was used to compare and rank the results of the network meta-analysis.
A total of 2485 patients were included in the 30 randomized controlled trial items. According to the clinical manifestations of sarcopenia, 7 different forms of exercise and nutrition interventions can improve muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical function; in terms of improving muscle strength, resistance exercise has the most significant effect on improving grip strength (MD = 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.06-4.07]); resistance exercise combined with nutrition lifting performed best in chair standing test (MD = -2.37, 95% CI [-4.73 to -0.33]). For muscle mass gains, resistance training increased appendicular skeletal muscle mass significantly (MD = 0.90, 95% CI [0.11-1.73]), while resistance exercise combined with nutrition significantly increased fat-free mass (MD = 5.15, 95% CI [0.91-9.43]). For physical activity, resistance training improved walk speed best (MD = 0.28, 95% CI [0.15-0.41]), and resistance exercise combined with nutrition in the best results were seen in the timed up and go test (MD = -2.31, 95% CI [-4.26 to -0.38]).
Compared with aerobic exercise, mixed exercise, nutrition, resistance combined with nutrition, mixed exercise combined with nutrition, and electric stimulation combined with nutrition, resistance exercise has more advantages in improving muscle mass, strength, and physical function performance. The clinical treatment of sarcopenia with resistance exercise intervention has a better curative effect.
本研究采用系统评价方法,对 7 种治疗肌少症的方法进行评估,包括抗阻运动、有氧运动、混合运动、营养、抗阻联合营养、混合运动联合营养、电刺激联合营养,并分析其对身体功能的影响。
按照 PRISMA 指南,检索 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 等外文数据库和中国知网、万方等中文数据库中关于不同干预措施的随机对照试验文献,采用 ADDIS 软件对网状Meta 分析结果进行比较和排序。
纳入 30 项随机对照试验的 2485 例患者。根据肌少症的临床表现,7 种不同形式的运动和营养干预均能改善肌肉力量、肌肉质量和身体功能;在改善肌肉力量方面,抗阻运动对握力的改善效果最显著(MD=2.58,95%CI[1.06-4.07]);抗阻运动联合营养提升在椅站试验中表现最佳(MD=-2.37,95%CI[-4.73 至-0.33])。对于肌肉质量的增加,抗阻训练可显著增加四肢骨骼肌质量(MD=0.90,95%CI[0.11-1.73]),而抗阻运动联合营养可显著增加去脂体重(MD=5.15,95%CI[0.91-9.43])。在身体活动方面,抗阻训练对步速的改善效果最佳(MD=0.28,95%CI[0.15-0.41]),抗阻运动联合营养在计时起立行走试验中的结果最佳(MD=-2.31,95%CI[-4.26 至-0.38])。
与有氧运动、混合运动、营养、抗阻联合营养、混合运动联合营养、电刺激联合营养相比,抗阻运动在改善肌肉质量、力量和身体功能表现方面更具优势。采用抗阻运动干预治疗肌少症的临床疗效更好。