Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung, Standort Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Heart Vessels. 2023 Oct;38(10):1277-1287. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02282-5. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
Despite the progress in understanding left atrial substrate and arrhythmogenesis, only little is known about conduction characteristics in atrial fibrillation patients with various stages of fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy (FACM). This study evaluates left atrial conduction times and conduction velocities based on high-density voltage and activation maps in sinus rhythm (CARTO3 V7) of 53 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (LVEF 60% (55-60 IQR), LAVI 39 ml/m (31-47 IQR), LApa 24 ± 6 cm). Measurements were made in low voltage areas (LVA ≤ 0.5 mV) and normal voltage areas (NVA ≥ 1.5 mV) at the left atrial anterior and posterior walls. Maps of 28 FACM and 25 no FACM patients were analyzed (19 FACM I/II, 9 FACM III/IV, LVA 14 ± 11 cm). Left atrial conduction time averaged to 110 ± 24 ms but was shown to be prolonged in FACM (119 ms, + 17%) when compared to no FACM patients (101 ms, p = 0.005). This finding was pronounced in high-grade FACM (III/IV) (133 ms, + 31.2%, p = 0.001). In addition, the LVA extension correlated significantly with the left atrial conduction time (r = 0.56, p = 0.002). Conduction velocities were overall slower in LVA than in NVA (0.6 ± 0.3 vs. 1.3 ± 0.5 m/s, -51%, p < 0.001). Anterior conduction appeared slower than posterior, which was significant in NVA (1 vs. 1.4 m/s, -29%, p < 0.001) but not in LVA (0.6 vs. 0.8 m/s, p = 0.096). FACM has a significant influence on left atrial conduction characteristics in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Left atrial conduction time prolongs with the grade of FACM and the quantitative expanse of LVA up to 31%. LVAs show a 51% conduction velocity reduction compared to NVA. Moreover, regional conduction velocity differences are present in the left atrium when comparing anterior to posterior walls. Our data may influence individualized ablation strategies.
尽管人们对左心房基质和心律失常发生机制的理解取得了进展,但对于纤维化心房心肌病(FACM)各阶段的心房颤动患者的左心房传导特性知之甚少。本研究基于窦性心律(CARTO3 V7)下的高密度电压和激活图,评估了 53 例持续性心房颤动患者的左心房传导时间和传导速度(LVEF 60%(55-60 IQR),LAVI 39 ml/m(31-47 IQR),LApa 24 ± 6 cm)。测量在左心房前壁和后壁的低电压区(LVA ≤ 0.5 mV)和正常电压区(NVA ≥ 1.5 mV)进行。分析了 28 例 FACM 和 25 例非 FACM 患者的地图(19 例 FACM I/II,9 例 FACM III/IV,LVA 14 ± 11 cm)。左心房传导时间平均为 110 ± 24 ms,但与非 FACM 患者(101 ms,p = 0.005)相比,FACM 患者的左心房传导时间延长(119 ms,+ 17%)。在高级别 FACM(III/IV)中,这种发现更为明显(133 ms,+ 31.2%,p = 0.001)。此外,LVA 延伸与左心房传导时间显著相关(r = 0.56,p = 0.002)。与 NVA 相比,LVA 中的传导速度总体较慢(0.6 ± 0.3 与 1.3 ± 0.5 m/s,-51%,p < 0.001)。前向传导比后向传导慢,在 NVA 中差异显著(1 与 1.4 m/s,-29%,p < 0.001),而在 LVA 中则不显著(0.6 与 0.8 m/s,p = 0.096)。FACM 对持续性心房颤动患者的左心房传导特性有显著影响。随着 FACM 的严重程度和 LVA 的定量扩展,左心房传导时间延长至 31%。与 NVA 相比,LVA 的传导速度降低了 51%。此外,当比较前壁和后壁时,左心房存在局部传导速度差异。我们的数据可能会影响个体化消融策略。