• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在巴塞罗那小学试点知情健康选择资源:一项混合方法研究。

Piloting the informed health choices resources in Barcelona primary schools: A mixed methods study.

机构信息

Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.

Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre (IbCC) - Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 7;18(7):e0288082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288082. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0288082
PMID:37418372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10328314/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The main objective of the Informed Health Choices (IHC) project is to teach people to assess treatment claims and make informed health choices. For this purpose, the IHC learning resources were developed for primary school children. The aim of this study is to explore students' and teachers' experience when using the IHC resources in primary schools in Barcelona (Spain).

METHODS

We conducted a mixed methods study for piloting the IHC resources in a convenience sample of primary schools in Barcelona. The intervention included a workshop with teachers, and nine lessons with students. We collected data using multiple approaches. We performed quantitative and qualitative analyses, and integrated the findings in a joint display. Finally, we formulated recommendations for using the IHC resources in this setting.

RESULTS

Two schools, with a total of 143 students in 4th and 5th grade and six teachers, participated in the study. One school followed the suggested IHC teaching plan and competed all the lessons; the other school modified the plan substantially and did not complete all the lessons. Overall, students and teachers from both schools understood, were interested in, and were able to apply the content of the lessons. During the lessons, the textbook was useful for students; nevertheless, for the teachers, the usefulness of the IHC resources was variable. Teachers adapted the IHC resources to increase student participation and used Information and Communications Technologies tools. We observed more facilitators than barriers to teach the lessons. The teachers suggested some ideas to improve the lessons based on activities they developed and implemented. The integration analysis showed great convergence of the quantitative and qualitative findings. We propose seven recommendations for using the IHC resources in this setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Students and teachers from primary schools in Barcelona showed a positive experience when using IHC resources; however, these resources should be adapted to promote classroom participation.

摘要

简介

知情健康选择(IHC)项目的主要目标是教导人们评估治疗主张并做出明智的健康选择。为此,为小学生开发了 IHC 学习资源。本研究旨在探讨学生和教师在巴塞罗那(西班牙)小学使用 IHC 资源的经验。

方法

我们在巴塞罗那的一所便利样本小学中进行了一项混合方法研究,以对 IHC 资源进行试点。干预措施包括教师研讨会和九节学生课程。我们使用多种方法收集数据。我们进行了定量和定性分析,并将研究结果整合到一个联合展示中。最后,我们为在这种情况下使用 IHC 资源提出了建议。

结果

两所学校共有 143 名 4 年级和 5 年级的学生和 6 名教师参与了研究。一所学校按照建议的 IHC 教学计划完成了所有课程;另一所学校则大幅修改了计划,并未完成所有课程。总体而言,两所学校的学生和教师都理解、感兴趣并能够应用课程的内容。在课程中,课本对学生很有用;然而,对教师而言,IHC 资源的有用性各不相同。教师根据增加学生参与度和使用信息通信技术工具对 IHC 资源进行了改编。我们观察到,在教授这些课程时,促进因素多于障碍。教师根据他们开发和实施的活动提出了一些改进课程的建议。整合分析显示,定量和定性发现之间存在很大的一致性。我们根据在这种情况下使用 IHC 资源提出了七点建议。

结论

巴塞罗那小学的学生和教师在使用 IHC 资源时表现出积极的体验;然而,这些资源应进行调整以促进课堂参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d08/10328314/0dd54bbbe86a/pone.0288082.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d08/10328314/b7259fd5f166/pone.0288082.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d08/10328314/d2cb20498b89/pone.0288082.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d08/10328314/0dd54bbbe86a/pone.0288082.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d08/10328314/b7259fd5f166/pone.0288082.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d08/10328314/d2cb20498b89/pone.0288082.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d08/10328314/0dd54bbbe86a/pone.0288082.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Piloting the informed health choices resources in Barcelona primary schools: A mixed methods study.在巴塞罗那小学试点知情健康选择资源:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 7;18(7):e0288082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288082. eCollection 2023.
2
Learning to make informed health choices: Protocol for a pilot study in schools in Barcelona.学习做出明智的健康选择:巴塞罗那学校试点研究方案。
F1000Res. 2019 Nov 28;8:2018. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21292.3. eCollection 2019.
3
Feasibility of contextualizing the Informed Health Choices learning resources in Italy: A pilot study in a primary school in Florence.在意大利使知情健康选择学习资源本地化的可行性:佛罗伦萨一所小学的试点研究。
F1000Res. 2022 Oct 12;11:1167. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.123728.1. eCollection 2022.
4
Effects of the Informed Health Choices primary school intervention on the ability of children in Uganda to assess the reliability of claims about treatment effects: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.知情健康选择小学干预对乌干达儿童评估治疗效果可靠性能力的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):374-388. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31226-6. Epub 2017 May 22.
5
Does the use of the Informed Healthcare Choices (IHC) primary school resources improve the ability of grade-5 children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial.使用《明智医疗选择》(IHC)小学资源是否能提高乌干达五年级儿童评估有关治疗效果说法的可信度的能力:一项整群随机试验方案
Trials. 2017 May 18;18(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1958-8.
6
Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study.乌干达采用健康明智选择干预措施进行健康批判性思维教学的过程评估:一项混合方法研究
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Dec 20;12(6). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00484.
7
Learning to think critically about health using digital technology in Ugandan lower secondary schools: A contextual analysis.利用数字技术在乌干达初中阶段培养学生对健康问题的批判性思维:背景分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0260367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260367. eCollection 2022.
8
Teaching critical thinking about health information and choices in secondary schools: human-centred design of digital resources.在中学阶段教授有关健康信息和选择的批判性思维:数字资源的以人为中心的设计。
F1000Res. 2024 Sep 4;12:481. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.132580.3. eCollection 2023.
9
Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Study.肯尼亚采用明智健康选择干预措施开展健康批判性思维教学的过程评估:一项混合方法研究
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Dec 20;12(6). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00485.
10
Informed health choices intervention to teach primary school children in low-income countries to assess claims about treatment effects: process evaluation.知情健康选择干预措施,以教导低收入国家的小学生评估有关治疗效果的主张:过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):e030787. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030787.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction: Piloting the informed health choices resources in Barcelona primary schools: A mixed methods study.更正:在巴塞罗那小学试行健康明智选择资源:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 17;20(6):e0326589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326589. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of contextualizing the Informed Health Choices learning resources in Italy: A pilot study in a primary school in Florence.在意大利使知情健康选择学习资源本地化的可行性:佛罗伦萨一所小学的试点研究。
F1000Res. 2022 Oct 12;11:1167. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.123728.1. eCollection 2022.
2
Quality of information in news media reports about the effects of health interventions: Systematic review and meta-analyses.新闻媒体报道健康干预措施效果的信息质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
F1000Res. 2021 Jun 1;10:433. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.52894.2. eCollection 2021.
3
Teaching and learning how to make informed health choices: Protocol for a context analysis in Spanish primary schools.
教授和学习如何做出明智的健康选择:西班牙小学中的情境分析方案。
F1000Res. 2021 Apr 22;10:312. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.51961.2. eCollection 2021.
4
A Public Health Research Agenda for Managing Infodemics: Methods and Results of the First WHO Infodemiology Conference.应对信息疫情的公共卫生研究议程:首届世界卫生组织信息流行病学会议的方法与成果
JMIR Infodemiology. 2021 Sep 15;1(1):e30979. doi: 10.2196/30979. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
A cross-sectional study on adaptation and initial validation of a test to evaluate health claims among high school students: Croatian version.一项横断面研究:评估高中生健康声称的测试的适应和初步验证:克罗地亚语版。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 10;11(8):e048754. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048754.
6
Comparison of the Informed Health Choices Key Concepts Framework to other frameworks relevant to teaching and learning how to think critically about health claims and choices: a systematic review.比较知情健康选择关键概念框架与其他与教授和学习如何批判性思考健康声明和选择相关的框架:系统评价。
F1000Res. 2020 Mar 5;9:164. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21858.1. eCollection 2020.
7
Learning to make informed health choices: Protocol for a pilot study in schools in Barcelona.学习做出明智的健康选择:巴塞罗那学校试点研究方案。
F1000Res. 2019 Nov 28;8:2018. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21292.3. eCollection 2019.
8
Development of the informed health choices resources in four countries to teach primary school children to assess claims about treatment effects: a qualitative study employing a user-centred approach.在四个国家开发知情健康选择资源,以教导小学生评估有关治疗效果的说法:一项采用以用户为中心方法的定性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Feb 10;6:18. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00565-6. eCollection 2020.
9
Informed health choices intervention to teach primary school children in low-income countries to assess claims about treatment effects: process evaluation.知情健康选择干预措施,以教导低收入国家的小学生评估有关治疗效果的主张:过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):e030787. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030787.
10
Evaluating people's ability to assess treatment claims: Validating a test in Mandarin from Claim Evaluation Tools database.评估人们评估治疗主张的能力:从 Claim Evaluation Tools 数据库验证中文测试。
J Evid Based Med. 2019 May;12(2):140-146. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12343.