• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在四个国家开发知情健康选择资源,以教导小学生评估有关治疗效果的说法:一项采用以用户为中心方法的定性研究。

Development of the informed health choices resources in four countries to teach primary school children to assess claims about treatment effects: a qualitative study employing a user-centred approach.

作者信息

Nsangi Allen, Semakula Daniel, Rosenbaum Sarah E, Oxman Andrew David, Oxman Matt, Morelli Angela, Austvoll-Dahlgren Astrid, Kaseje Margaret, Mugisha Michael, Uwitonze Anne-Marie, Glenton Claire, Lewin Simon, Fretheim Atle, Sewankambo Nelson Kaulukusi

机构信息

1College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

2University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Feb 10;6:18. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00565-6. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-020-00565-6
PMID:32055405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7008535/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People of all ages are flooded with health claims about treatment effects (benefits and harms of treatments). Many of these are not reliable, and many people lack skills to assess their reliability. Primary school is the ideal time to begin to teach these skills, to lay a foundation for continued learning and enable children to make well-informed health choices, as they grow older. However, these skills are rarely being taught and yet there are no rigorously developed and evaluated resources for teaching these skills.

OBJECTIVES

To develop the Informed Health Choices (IHC) resources (for learning and teaching people to assess claims about the effects of treatments) for primary school children and teachers.

METHODS

We prototyped, piloted, and user-tested resources in four settings that included Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda, and Norway. We employed a user-centred approach to designing IHC resources which entailed multiple iterative cycles of development (determining content scope, generating ideas, prototyping, testing, analysing and refining) based on continuous close collaboration with teachers and children.

RESULTS

We identified 24 Key Concepts that are important for children to learn. We developed a comic book and a separate exercise book to introduce and explain the Key Concepts to the children, combining lessons with exercises and classroom activities. We developed a teachers' guide to supplement the resources for children.

CONCLUSION

By employing a user-centred approach to designing resources to teach primary children to think critically about treatment claims and choices, we developed learning resources that end users experienced as useful, easy to use and well-suited to use in diverse classroom settings.

摘要

背景

各个年龄段的人们都充斥着关于治疗效果(治疗的益处和危害)的健康声明。其中许多并不可靠,而且许多人缺乏评估其可靠性的技能。小学是开始教授这些技能的理想时机,为持续学习奠定基础,并使孩子们在成长过程中能够做出明智的健康选择。然而,这些技能很少被教授,而且目前还没有经过严格开发和评估的教授这些技能的资源。

目的

为小学生和教师开发“明智健康选择”(IHC)资源(用于学习和教导人们评估关于治疗效果的声明)。

方法

我们在乌干达、肯尼亚、卢旺达和挪威这四个地区对资源进行了原型设计、试点测试和用户测试。我们采用以用户为中心的方法来设计IHC资源,这需要基于与教师和儿童的持续密切合作,进行多个迭代开发周期(确定内容范围、产生想法、制作原型、测试、分析和完善)。

结果

我们确定了24个对儿童学习很重要的关键概念。我们编写了一本漫画书和一本单独的练习册,向孩子们介绍和解释这些关键概念,将课程与练习及课堂活动相结合。我们还编写了一本教师指南,以补充面向儿童的资源。

结论

通过采用以用户为中心的方法来设计资源,教导小学生批判性地思考治疗声明和选择,我们开发出了终端用户认为有用、易于使用且非常适合在不同课堂环境中使用的学习资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/ed4a091f2ab5/40814_2020_565_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/d737d00cb338/40814_2020_565_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/dd1c78ad4dd4/40814_2020_565_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/e82946380b87/40814_2020_565_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/35077fc70255/40814_2020_565_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/7279e7ef0a64/40814_2020_565_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/abf5b57bab5e/40814_2020_565_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/ed4a091f2ab5/40814_2020_565_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/d737d00cb338/40814_2020_565_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/dd1c78ad4dd4/40814_2020_565_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/e82946380b87/40814_2020_565_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/35077fc70255/40814_2020_565_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/7279e7ef0a64/40814_2020_565_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/abf5b57bab5e/40814_2020_565_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4422/7008535/ed4a091f2ab5/40814_2020_565_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the informed health choices resources in four countries to teach primary school children to assess claims about treatment effects: a qualitative study employing a user-centred approach.在四个国家开发知情健康选择资源,以教导小学生评估有关治疗效果的说法:一项采用以用户为中心方法的定性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Feb 10;6:18. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00565-6. eCollection 2020.
2
Does the use of the Informed Healthcare Choices (IHC) primary school resources improve the ability of grade-5 children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial.使用《明智医疗选择》(IHC)小学资源是否能提高乌干达五年级儿童评估有关治疗效果说法的可信度的能力:一项整群随机试验方案
Trials. 2017 May 18;18(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1958-8.
3
Effects of the Informed Health Choices primary school intervention on the ability of children in Uganda to assess the reliability of claims about treatment effects: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.知情健康选择小学干预对乌干达儿童评估治疗效果可靠性能力的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):374-388. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31226-6. Epub 2017 May 22.
4
Teaching critical thinking about health information and choices in secondary schools: human-centred design of digital resources.在中学阶段教授有关健康信息和选择的批判性思维:数字资源的以人为中心的设计。
F1000Res. 2024 Sep 4;12:481. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.132580.3. eCollection 2023.
5
Feasibility of contextualizing the Informed Health Choices learning resources in Italy: A pilot study in a primary school in Florence.在意大利使知情健康选择学习资源本地化的可行性:佛罗伦萨一所小学的试点研究。
F1000Res. 2022 Oct 12;11:1167. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.123728.1. eCollection 2022.
6
Development of mass media resources to improve the ability of parents of primary school children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: a human-centred design approach.开发大众媒体资源以提高乌干达小学生家长评估有关治疗效果说法可信度的能力:一种以人为本的设计方法。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Dec 29;5:155. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0540-4. eCollection 2019.
7
Informed health choices intervention to teach primary school children in low-income countries to assess claims about treatment effects: process evaluation.知情健康选择干预措施,以教导低收入国家的小学生评估有关治疗效果的主张:过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):e030787. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030787.
8
Learning to think critically about health using digital technology in Ugandan lower secondary schools: A contextual analysis.利用数字技术在乌干达初中阶段培养学生对健康问题的批判性思维:背景分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0260367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260367. eCollection 2022.
9
Piloting the informed health choices resources in Barcelona primary schools: A mixed methods study.在巴塞罗那小学试点知情健康选择资源:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 7;18(7):e0288082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288082. eCollection 2023.
10
Key Concepts for Informed Health Choices: a framework for helping people learn how to assess treatment claims and make informed choices.知情健康决策的关键概念:帮助人们学习如何评估治疗主张并做出明智选择的框架。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Feb;23(1):29-33. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110829.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality criteria for evaluating creative and interactive science dissemination in public outreach efforts: A scoping review.评估公共宣传活动中创新性和互动性科学传播的质量标准:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 24;20(7):e0328800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328800. eCollection 2025.
2
What is the effect of the Informed Health Choices secondary school intervention on the ability of students in Rwanda to think critically about health choices after one-year follow-up? A cluster-randomized trial.经过一年的随访,“明智健康选择”中学干预措施对卢旺达学生批判性思考健康选择能力的影响如何?一项整群随机试验。
Trials. 2025 May 15;26(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08779-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Development of mass media resources to improve the ability of parents of primary school children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: a human-centred design approach.开发大众媒体资源以提高乌干达小学生家长评估有关治疗效果说法可信度的能力:一种以人为本的设计方法。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Dec 29;5:155. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0540-4. eCollection 2019.
2
Informed health choices intervention to teach primary school children in low-income countries to assess claims about treatment effects: process evaluation.知情健康选择干预措施,以教导低收入国家的小学生评估有关治疗效果的主张:过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):e030787. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030787.
3
Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Study.
肯尼亚采用明智健康选择干预措施开展健康批判性思维教学的过程评估:一项混合方法研究
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Dec 20;12(6). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00485.
4
Effects of the informed health choices secondary school intervention after 1 year: a prospective meta-analysis using individual participant data.知情健康选择中学干预 1 年后的效果:使用个体参与者数据的前瞻性荟萃分析。
Trials. 2024 Oct 30;25(1):733. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08577-w.
5
Teaching critical thinking about health information and choices in secondary schools: human-centred design of digital resources.在中学阶段教授有关健康信息和选择的批判性思维:数字资源的以人为中心的设计。
F1000Res. 2024 Sep 4;12:481. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.132580.3. eCollection 2023.
6
Key concepts for informed health choices: Where's the evidence?知情选择的关键概念:证据在哪里?
F1000Res. 2023 Nov 27;11:890. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.123051.1. eCollection 2022.
7
Piloting the informed health choices resources in Barcelona primary schools: A mixed methods study.在巴塞罗那小学试点知情健康选择资源:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 7;18(7):e0288082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288082. eCollection 2023.
8
Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study.优先考虑将知情健康选择(IHC)关键概念纳入中学资源:一项共识研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 7;18(4):e0267422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267422. eCollection 2023.
9
Feasibility of contextualizing the Informed Health Choices learning resources in Italy: A pilot study in a primary school in Florence.在意大利使知情健康选择学习资源本地化的可行性:佛罗伦萨一所小学的试点研究。
F1000Res. 2022 Oct 12;11:1167. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.123728.1. eCollection 2022.
10
Learning to think critically about health using digital technology in Ugandan lower secondary schools: A contextual analysis.利用数字技术在乌干达初中阶段培养学生对健康问题的批判性思维:背景分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0260367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260367. eCollection 2022.
Establishing a library of resources to help people understand key concepts in assessing treatment claims-The "Critical thinking and Appraisal Resource Library" (CARL).
建立一个资源库,以帮助人们理解评估治疗主张中的关键概念——“批判性思维与评估资源库”(CARL)。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0178666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178666. eCollection 2017.
4
Effects of the Informed Health Choices podcast on the ability of parents of primary school children in Uganda to assess claims about treatment effects: a randomised controlled trial.《知情健康选择播客对乌干达小学生家长评估治疗效果主张能力的影响:一项随机对照试验》
Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):389-398. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31225-4. Epub 2017 May 22.
5
Effects of the Informed Health Choices primary school intervention on the ability of children in Uganda to assess the reliability of claims about treatment effects: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.知情健康选择小学干预对乌干达儿童评估治疗效果可靠性能力的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):374-388. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31226-6. Epub 2017 May 22.
6
Interventions and assessment tools addressing key concepts people need to know to appraise claims about treatment effects: a systematic mapping review.针对人们评估治疗效果相关声明所需了解的关键概念的干预措施和评估工具:一项系统映射综述
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 29;5(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0389-z.
7
Effects of School-Based Educational Interventions for Enhancing Adolescents Abilities in Critical Appraisal of Health Claims: A Systematic Review.以学校为基础的教育干预对提高青少年健康声明批判性评估能力的影响:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 24;11(8):e0161485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161485. eCollection 2016.
8
Changing health-promoting behaviours through narrative interventions: A systematic review.通过叙事干预改变促进健康的行为:系统评价。
J Health Psychol. 2018 Sep;23(11):1499-1517. doi: 10.1177/1359105316656243. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
9
Teaching children in low-income countries to assess claims about treatment effects: prioritization of key concepts.教低收入国家的儿童评估关于治疗效果的说法:关键概念的优先级
J Evid Based Med. 2015 Nov;8(4):173-80. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12176.
10
Key concepts that people need to understand to assess claims about treatment effects.评估治疗效果相关说法所需理解的关键概念。
J Evid Based Med. 2015 Aug;8(3):112-25. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12160.