• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实现住院成年患者安全抗菌静脉到口服转换的标准:系统快速评价。

Criteria to achieve safe antimicrobial intravenous-to-oral switch in hospitalised adult populations: a systematic rapid review.

机构信息

Healthcare-Associated Infection, Fungal, Antimicrobial Resistance, Antimicrobial Use & Sepsis Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK.

NIHR Health Protection Research Unit, Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 7;13(7):e068299. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068299.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068299
PMID:37419640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10335582/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This rapid review aimed to assess and collate intravenous-to-oral switch (IVOS) criteria from the literature to achieve safe and effective antimicrobial IVOS in the hospital inpatient adult population.

DESIGN

The rapid review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

DATA SOURCES

OVID Embase and Medline databases.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Articles of adult populations published globally between 2017 and 2021 were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

An Excel spreadsheet was designed with specific column headings. IVOS criteria from UK hospital IVOS policies informed the framework synthesis.

RESULTS

IVOS criteria from 45/164 (27%) local IVOS policies were categorised into a five-section framework: (1) timing of IV antimicrobial review, (2) clinical signs and symptoms, (3) infection markers, (4) enteral route and (5) infection exclusions. The literature search identified 477 papers, of which 16 were included. The most common timing for review was 48-72 hours from initiation of intravenous antimicrobial (n=5, 30%). Nine studies (56%) stated clinical signs and symptoms must be improving. Temperature was the most frequently mentioned infection marker (n=14, 88%). Endocarditis had the highest mention as an infection exclusion (n=12, 75%). Overall, 33 IVOS criteria were identified to go forward into the Delphi process.

CONCLUSION

Through the rapid review, 33 IVOS criteria were collated and presented within five distinct and comprehensive sections. The literature highlighted the possibility of reviewing IVOS before 48-72 hours and of presenting heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate as a combination early warning score criterion. The criteria identified can serve as a starting point of IVOS criteria review for any institution globally, as no country or region limits were applied. Further research is required to achieve consensus on IVOS criteria from healthcare professionals that manage patients with infections.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022320343.

摘要

目的

本快速综述旨在评估和整理文献中的静脉-口服转换(IVOS)标准,以实现医院住院成年患者人群中安全有效的抗菌 IVOS。

设计

快速综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目声明。

数据来源

OVID Embase 和 Medline 数据库。

入选标准

纳入 2017 年至 2021 年期间在全球发表的成年人群体的文章。

数据提取和综合

设计了一个带有特定列标题的 Excel 电子表格。英国医院 IVOS 政策中的 IVOS 标准为框架综合提供了信息。

结果

将 45/164(27%)个本地 IVOS 政策中的 IVOS 标准分为五个部分框架:(1)IV 抗菌药物审查的时间,(2)临床症状和体征,(3)感染标志物,(4)肠内途径和(5)感染排除。文献检索确定了 477 篇论文,其中 16 篇被纳入。审查最常见的时间是从开始静脉内抗菌药物治疗后 48-72 小时(n=5,30%)。有 9 项研究(56%)指出临床症状和体征必须改善。体温是最常提到的感染标志物(n=14,88%)。作为感染排除标准,心内膜炎被提及最多(n=12,75%)。总体而言,确定了 33 个 IVOS 标准进入 Delphi 过程。

结论

通过快速综述,整理并呈现了 33 个 IVOS 标准,分为五个明确和全面的部分。文献强调了在 48-72 小时之前审查 IVOS 的可能性,并提出将心率、血压和呼吸率作为早期预警评分标准的组合。确定的标准可以作为任何全球机构的 IVOS 标准审查的起点,因为没有应用任何国家或地区的限制。需要进一步研究以在管理感染患者的医疗保健专业人员中就 IVOS 标准达成共识。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022320343。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b501/10335582/6aabddd280f8/bmjopen-2022-068299f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b501/10335582/6aabddd280f8/bmjopen-2022-068299f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b501/10335582/6aabddd280f8/bmjopen-2022-068299f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Criteria to achieve safe antimicrobial intravenous-to-oral switch in hospitalised adult populations: a systematic rapid review.实现住院成年患者安全抗菌静脉到口服转换的标准:系统快速评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 7;13(7):e068299. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068299.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Development of National Antimicrobial Intravenous-to-Oral Switch Criteria and Decision Aid.国家抗菌药物静脉转口服转换标准及决策辅助工具的制定。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 7;12(6):2086. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062086.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Nurses' attitudes, behaviours, and enablers of intravenous to oral switching (IVOS) of antibiotics: a mixed-methods survey of nursing staff in secondary care hospitals across the Midlands region of England.护士对静脉用抗生素转为口服抗生素的态度、行为和促成因素:英格兰中部地区二级保健医院护理人员的混合方法调查。
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Aug;150:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.05.007. Epub 2024 May 21.
6
Improving antimicrobial prescribing: implementation of an antimicrobial i.v.-to-oral switch policy.改善抗菌药物处方:抗菌药物静脉转口服转换政策的实施
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2013;43(4):294-300. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2013.403.
7
The Impact of a Pharmacist-Led Intravenous to Oral Switch of Metronidazole: A Before-and-After Study.药师主导的甲硝唑静脉给药转换为口服给药的影响:一项前后对照研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Sep 25;11(10):1303. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11101303.
8
Initial assessment and management of adults with suspected acute respiratory infection: a rapid evidence synthesis of reviews and cost-effectiveness studies.疑似急性呼吸道感染成人的初始评估与管理:综述及成本效益研究的快速证据综合分析
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Sep 4:1-53. doi: 10.3310/GRPL6978.
9
Physicians' understanding of antibiotic intravenous-to-oral switching-a qualitative study in Suzhou, China.中国苏州的一项定性研究:医生对抗生素静脉到口服转换的理解。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 30;24(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11064-2.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Physicians' understanding of antibiotic intravenous-to-oral switching-a qualitative study in Suzhou, China.中国苏州的一项定性研究:医生对抗生素静脉到口服转换的理解。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 30;24(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11064-2.
2
Development of National Antimicrobial Intravenous-to-Oral Switch Criteria and Decision Aid.国家抗菌药物静脉转口服转换标准及决策辅助工具的制定。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 7;12(6):2086. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062086.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on early switch from intravenous-to-oral antimicrobials in hospitalized adults: A systematic review.抗菌药物管理干预措施对住院成人患者从静脉注射抗菌药物尽早转换为口服抗菌药物的有效性:一项系统评价。
Am J Infect Control. 2023 Jan;51(1):89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.05.017. Epub 2022 May 27.
2
Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis.2019 年全球细菌对抗菌药物耐药性的负担:系统分析。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):629-655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
3
Feasibility study of hospital antimicrobial stewardship analytics using electronic health records.
利用电子健康记录进行医院抗菌药物管理分析的可行性研究。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Mar 4;3(1):dlab018. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab018. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Interventions to improve the review of antibiotic therapy in acute care hospitals: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.改善急性护理医院抗生素治疗评估的干预措施:一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Sep 17;2(3):dlaa065. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa065. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
The association of body temperature with antibiotic therapy and mortality in patients attending the emergency department with suspected infection.体温与抗生素治疗及疑似感染急诊患者死亡率的关系。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec 1;28(6):440-447. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000817.
6
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
8
Systematic review: the bioavailability of orally administered antibiotics during the initial phase of a systemic infection in non-ICU patients.系统评价:非 ICU 患者全身感染初始阶段口服抗生素的生物利用度。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 20;21(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05919-w.
9
Health care's response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England.医疗保健应对气候变化:英格兰国民保健制度的碳足迹评估。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Feb;5(2):e84-e92. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30271-0.
10
Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Antimicrobial Stewardship Activities/Programs in the United Kingdom.评估新冠疫情对英国抗菌药物管理活动/项目的影响。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jan 23;10(2):110. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10020110.