Cui Di, Janela Dora, Costa Fabíola, Molinos Maria, Areias Anabela C, Moulder Robert G, Scheer Justin K, Bento Virgílio, Cohen Steven P, Yanamadala Vijay, Correia Fernando Dias
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Georgia.
Sword Health, Inc., Draper, UT, USA.
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jul 7;6(1):121. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00870-3.
Low back pain (LBP) is the world's leading cause of years lived with disability. Digital exercise-based interventions have shown great potential in the management of musculoskeletal conditions, promoting access and easing the economic burden. However, evidence of their effectiveness for chronic LBP (CLBP) management compared to in-person physiotherapy has yet to be unequivocally established. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with CLBP following a digital intervention versus evidence-based in-person physiotherapy. Our results demonstrate that patient satisfaction and adherence were high and similar between groups, although a significantly lower dropout rate is observed in the digital group (11/70, 15.7% versus 24/70, 34.3% in the conventional group; P = 0.019). Both groups experience significant improvements in disability (primary outcome), with no differences between groups in change from baseline (median difference: -0.55, 95% CI: -2.42 to 5.81, P = 0.412) or program-end scores (-1.05, 95% CI: -4.14 to 6.37; P = 0.671). Likewise, no significant differences between groups are found for secondary outcomes (namely pain, anxiety, depression, and overall productivity impairment). This RCT demonstrates that a remote digital intervention for CLBP can promote the same levels of recovery as evidence-based in-person physiotherapy, being a potential avenue to ease the burden of CLBP.
腰痛(LBP)是全球导致残疾生存年数的首要原因。基于数字运动的干预措施在肌肉骨骼疾病管理方面显示出巨大潜力,可促进医疗服务可及性并减轻经济负担。然而,与面对面物理治疗相比,其对慢性腰痛(CLBP)管理有效性的证据尚未明确确立。这项随机对照试验(RCT)旨在比较CLBP患者在接受数字干预与循证面对面物理治疗后的临床结局。我们的结果表明,两组患者的满意度和依从性都很高且相似,尽管数字组的退出率显著更低(数字组11/70,15.7%;传统组24/70,34.3%;P = 0.019)。两组患者的残疾状况(主要结局)均有显著改善,两组从基线的变化(中位数差异:-0.55,95%CI:-2.42至5.81,P = 0.412)或项目结束时的得分(-1.05,95%CI:-4.14至6.37;P = 0.671)均无差异。同样,两组在次要结局(即疼痛、焦虑、抑郁和总体生产力受损)方面也未发现显著差异。这项RCT表明,针对CLBP的远程数字干预可促进与循证面对面物理治疗相同程度的康复,是减轻CLBP负担的一个潜在途径。