• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cook 分期拔管套件在困难气道患者中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of Cook staged Extubation Set in patients with difficult airway: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 7;23(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02191-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-023-02191-0
PMID:37420175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10327169/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cook Stage extubation is a tool developed by Cook Medical for patients with difficult airways. Multiple clinical studies demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of Cook Stage extubation Set (CSES). Currently, no systematic review evidence has been published in this field. Therefore, this study aimed to review the clinical success rate, safety, and tolerability of CSES in patients with difficult airways.

METHOD

The inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study designs. An electronic search was conducted, and the following databases were used: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Search keywords included difficult airway and CSES. The primary outcome was the CSES clinical success rate.The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for Case Series were used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. R studio, version 4.2.2. was used to perform the statistical analysis. The Cochrane Q and I statistics were used to test the heterogeneity among all studies. Details of the included case reports were summarized in the systematic review part.

RESULTS

Five studies were eligible for meta-analysis, and 7 case reports were included for systematic review. The pooled overall CSES clinical success rate was 93% (95% CI: 85%, 97%). The CSES intolerable and complication incidence rates were 9% (95% CI: 5%, 18%) and 5% (95% CI: 2%, 12%), respectively. CSES clinical success rate was influenced by the study center and study design. The success rate of CSES was higher in multicenter and prospective design studies. Seven case reports have documented the successful operation of CSES intubation in obese, tall, oncologist, and pediatric patients.

DISCUSSION

This meta-analysis suggested that CSES have achieved a high clinical success rate in adult and pediatric patients with different physical conditions and types of surgery. The results of all original studies and meta-analysis confirmed a remarkably high tolerance rate and low overall complication rate. However, regardless of the tools chosen, a personalized, safe intubation strategy and a highly qualified anesthesiologist should be considered as the fundamental guarantee of a high clinical success rate. Future studies should also focus on the success rate of reintubation using CSES in patients with airway difficulties.

摘要

背景

Cook 阶段拔管是 Cook 医疗公司为气道困难患者开发的一种工具。多项临床研究证明了 Cook 阶段拔管套件(CSES)的有效性和安全性。目前,该领域尚未发表系统评价证据。因此,本研究旨在回顾 CSES 在气道困难患者中的临床成功率、安全性和耐受性。

方法

纳入标准基于人群、干预、对照、结局和研究设计。进行了电子检索,并使用了以下数据库:PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science。检索关键词包括困难气道和 CSES。主要结局是 CSES 的临床成功率。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所病例系列的批判性评价工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。使用 R 工作室,版本 4.2.2 进行统计分析。使用 Cochrane Q 和 I 统计量检验所有研究之间的异质性。纳入病例报告的详细信息在系统评价部分进行了总结。

结果

五项研究符合荟萃分析条件,七项病例报告纳入系统评价。总体 CSES 临床成功率为 93%(95%CI:85%,97%)。CSES 不耐受和并发症发生率分别为 9%(95%CI:5%,18%)和 5%(95%CI:2%,12%)。CSES 临床成功率受研究中心和研究设计的影响。多中心和前瞻性设计研究中 CSES 的成功率更高。七份病例报告记录了 CSES 成功用于肥胖、高大、肿瘤学家和儿科患者的插管操作。

讨论

荟萃分析表明,CSES 在不同身体状况和手术类型的成年和儿科患者中均取得了较高的临床成功率。所有原始研究和荟萃分析的结果均证实了极高的耐受性和较低的总体并发症发生率。然而,无论选择何种工具,个性化、安全的插管策略和高素质的麻醉师都应被视为高临床成功率的基本保障。未来的研究还应关注 CSES 在气道困难患者中再次插管的成功率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/c44d77212b01/12871_2023_2191_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/7ad0a08f6249/12871_2023_2191_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/74510d7acd7c/12871_2023_2191_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/417dc7dd3999/12871_2023_2191_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/e5ae44aac279/12871_2023_2191_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/196cad396690/12871_2023_2191_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/263a0fc75743/12871_2023_2191_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/e721100fc1d3/12871_2023_2191_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/457b1d5d198e/12871_2023_2191_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/4966ceefa4f3/12871_2023_2191_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/dd418fbfcd3e/12871_2023_2191_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/93cf69b04471/12871_2023_2191_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/3b1220378114/12871_2023_2191_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/c44d77212b01/12871_2023_2191_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/7ad0a08f6249/12871_2023_2191_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/74510d7acd7c/12871_2023_2191_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/417dc7dd3999/12871_2023_2191_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/e5ae44aac279/12871_2023_2191_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/196cad396690/12871_2023_2191_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/263a0fc75743/12871_2023_2191_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/e721100fc1d3/12871_2023_2191_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/457b1d5d198e/12871_2023_2191_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/4966ceefa4f3/12871_2023_2191_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/dd418fbfcd3e/12871_2023_2191_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/93cf69b04471/12871_2023_2191_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/3b1220378114/12871_2023_2191_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c81/10327169/c44d77212b01/12871_2023_2191_Fig13_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of Cook staged Extubation Set in patients with difficult airway: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cook 分期拔管套件在困难气道患者中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 7;23(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02191-0.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Assessment of the reliability of intubation and ease of use of the Cook Staged Extubation Set-an observational study.库克分级拔管套件插管可靠性及易用性评估——一项观察性研究
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017 Nov;45(6):695-699. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1704500608.
4
Safety and efficacy of Staged Extubation Set in patients with difficult airway: a prospective multicenter study.分期拔管套件在困难气道患者中的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Aug;86(8):827-834. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14105-1. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
5
Performance of the cuff leak test in adults in predicting post-extubation airway complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人气囊漏气试验预测拔管后气道并发症的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2020 Nov 7;24(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03358-8.
6
A prospective study of the safety of tracheal extubation using a pediatric airway exchange catheter for patients with a known difficult airway.一项针对已知气道困难患者使用儿童气道交换导管进行气管拔管安全性的前瞻性研究。
Chest. 1997 Jun;111(6):1660-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.111.6.1660.
7
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.针对需要气管插管的成年患者,视频喉镜检查与直接喉镜检查的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2.
8
Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on extubation times, length of stay and mortality rates in adult cardiac surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.右美托咪定与丙泊酚对成人心脏手术患者拔管时间、住院时间和死亡率的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 May;16(5):1220-1239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003488.
9
Tracheal extubation in children with difficult airways: a descriptive cohort analysis.困难气道儿童的气管拔管:一项描述性队列分析。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Apr;26(4):372-7. doi: 10.1111/pan.12837. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
10
Unplanned extubation among critically ill adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.危重症成人意外拔管:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Jun;70:103219. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103219. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a consensus guideline from the Project for Universal Management of Airways and international airway societies.预防未识别的食管插管:气道普遍管理项目和国际气道学会的共识指南。
Anaesthesia. 2022 Dec;77(12):1395-1415. doi: 10.1111/anae.15817. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway.2022 年美国麻醉医师学会困难气道管理实践指南。
Anesthesiology. 2022 Jan 1;136(1):31-81. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002.
3
Laryngeal Injury and Upper Airway Symptoms After Endotracheal Intubation During Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
气管插管术后的喉损伤和上呼吸道症状:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Apr 1;132(4):1023-1032. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005276.
4
Safety and efficacy of Staged Extubation Set in patients with difficult airway: a prospective multicenter study.分期拔管套件在困难气道患者中的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Aug;86(8):827-834. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14105-1. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
5
An assessment of the tolerability of the Cook staged extubation wire in patients with known or suspected difficult airways extubated in intensive care.评估在重症监护室中对已知或疑似困难气道的患者使用 Cook 分期拔管导丝进行拔管的耐受性。
Anaesthesia. 2018 May;73(5):587-593. doi: 10.1111/anae.14244. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
6
Assessment of the reliability of intubation and ease of use of the Cook Staged Extubation Set-an observational study.库克分级拔管套件插管可靠性及易用性评估——一项观察性研究
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017 Nov;45(6):695-699. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1704500608.
7
Comparison of the effectiveness of high flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. standard non-rebreather oxygen face mask in post-extubation intensive care unit patients.高流量鼻氧管与标准无重复呼吸面罩对拔管后重症监护病房患者有效性的比较。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2014 Nov;16(11):718-22.
8
Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome.经气管插管拔管后使用鼻塞高流量与文丘里面罩吸氧治疗的比较:对氧合、舒适度和临床结局的影响。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 1;190(3):282-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0364OC.
9
Airway exchange failure and complications with the use of the Cook Airway Exchange Catheter®: a single center cohort study of 1177 patients.使用 Cook 气道交换导管®时发生气道交换失败和并发症:一项 1177 例患者的单中心队列研究。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Dec;117(6):1325-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a7cd3d.
10
The difficult airway with recommendations for management--part 1--difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient.困难气道及处理建议——第 1 部分——意识丧失/诱导下的困难气管插管。
Can J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;60(11):1089-118. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-0019-3. Epub 2013 Oct 17.