Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System Palo Alto CA USA.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine, and Cardiovascular Institute Stanford CA USA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jul 18;12(14):e029910. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029910. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
Background Cardiovascular procedural treatments were deferred at scale during the COVID-19 pandemic, with unclear impact on patients presenting with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods and Results In a retrospective cohort study of all patients diagnosed with NSTEMI in the US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System from January 1, 2019 to October 30, 2022 (n=67 125), procedural treatments and outcomes were compared between the prepandemic period and 6 unique pandemic phases: (1) acute phase, (2) community spread, (3) first peak, (4) post vaccine, (5) second peak, and (6) recovery. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the association between pandemic phases and 30-day mortality. NSTEMI volumes dropped significantly with the pandemic onset (62.7% of prepandemic peak) and did not revert to prepandemic levels in subsequent phases, even after vaccine availability. Percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting volumes declined proportionally. Compared with the prepandemic period, patients with NSTEMI experienced higher 30-day mortality during Phases 2 and 3, even after adjustment for COVID-19-positive status, demographics, baseline comorbidities, and receipt of procedural treatment (adjusted odds ratio for Phases 2 and 3 combined, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.13-1.43], <0.01). Patients receiving Veterans Affairs-paid community care had a higher adjusted risk of 30-day mortality compared with those at Veterans Affairs hospitals across all 6 pandemic phases. Conclusions Higher mortality after NSTEMI occurred during the initial spread and first peak of the pandemic but resolved before the second, higher peak-suggesting effective adaptation of care delivery but a costly delay to implementation. Investigation into the vulnerabilities of the early pandemic spread are vital to informing future resource-constrained practices.
背景 在 COVID-19 大流行期间,心血管程序治疗大规模推迟,其对非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者的影响尚不清楚。
方法和结果 在一项对美国退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 10 月 30 日期间所有诊断为 NSTEMI 的患者的回顾性队列研究中,比较了大流行前时期和 6 个独特的大流行阶段的程序治疗和结局:(1)急性阶段,(2)社区传播,(3)第一高峰,(4)疫苗接种后,(5)第二高峰和(6)恢复。多变量回归分析用于评估大流行阶段与 30 天死亡率之间的关联。随着大流行的爆发,NSTEMI 的数量显著下降(降至大流行前峰值的 62.7%),并且即使在疫苗可用后,也没有恢复到大流行前的水平。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的数量相应下降。与大流行前时期相比,NSTEMI 患者在第 2 阶段和第 3 阶段的 30 天死亡率更高,即使在调整 COVID-19 阳性状态、人口统计学、基线合并症和接受程序治疗后也是如此(第 2 阶段和第 3 阶段联合的调整比值比,1.26 [95%CI,1.13-1.43],<0.01)。与在退伍军人事务部医院接受治疗的患者相比,在退伍军人事务部支付社区护理的患者在所有 6 个大流行阶段的 30 天死亡率调整风险更高。
结论 在大流行的初始传播和第一高峰期间,NSTEMI 后死亡率更高,但在第二高峰之前得到缓解-表明医疗服务提供的有效适应,但实施延迟代价高昂。对大流行早期传播的脆弱性进行调查对于为未来资源受限的实践提供信息至关重要。