Department of Dental Clinic, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Ceara, Rua Monsenhor Furtado, 1273, Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sleep Breath. 2024 Mar;28(1):11-28. doi: 10.1007/s11325-023-02861-w. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
Anthropometric measurements can be used to identify children at risk of developing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The study aimed to assess which anthropometric measurements (AMs) are most associated with an increased predisposition to develop OSA in healthy children and adolescents.
We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO #CRD42022310572) that searched eight databases and gray literature.
In eight studies with low-to-high risk of bias, investigators reported the following AMs: body mass index (BMI), neck circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, neck-to-waist ratio, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, and facial AMs. The meta-analysis showed that the OSA group had an average of 1.00 cm greater for the neck circumference (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 2.26 [0.72, 5.23]), 3.07 cm greater for the waist circumference (p = 0.030; Cohen's d = 0.28 [0.02, 0.53]), 3.96 cm greater for the hip circumference (p = 0.040; Cohen's d = 0.28 [0.02, 0.55]), 5.21° greater for the cervicomental angle (p = 0.020; Cohen's d = 0.31 [0.03, 0.59]), and 1.23° greater for maxillary-mandibular relationship angle (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.47 [0.22, 0.72]) than the control group. The mandibular depth angle had a reduction of 1.86° (p = 0.001; Cohen's d = -0.36° [-0.65, -0.08]) in control than in patients with OSA. The BMI (p = 0.180), waist-to-hip ratio (p = 0.280), neck-to-waist ratio (p = 0.070), maxillary depth angle (p = 0.250), and upper/lower face height ratio (p = 0.070) showed no significant differences between groups.
Compared to the control group, the OSA group exhibited a greater mean difference in neck circumference, the only anthropometric measurement with high certainty of evidence.
人体测量学指标可用于识别有发生阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)风险的儿童。本研究旨在评估哪些人体测量学指标(AMs)与健康儿童和青少年发生 OSA 的倾向性增加最相关。
我们进行了一项系统评价(PROSPERO #CRD42022310572),该评价在八个数据库和灰色文献中进行了检索。
在八项低至高偏倚风险的研究中,研究者报告了以下人体测量学指标:体重指数(BMI)、颈围、臀围、腰臀比、颈腰比、腰围、腰高比和面部 AMs。荟萃分析显示,OSA 组的颈围平均增加 1.00cm(p<0.001;Cohen's d=2.26[0.72, 5.23]),腰围增加 3.07cm(p=0.030;Cohen's d=0.28[0.02, 0.53]),臀围增加 3.96cm(p=0.040;Cohen's d=0.28[0.02, 0.55]),颈-颈角增加 5.21°(p=0.020;Cohen's d=0.31[0.03, 0.59]),上颌-下颌关系角增加 1.23°(p<0.001;Cohen's d=0.47[0.22, 0.72]),而对照组的颈-颈角增加 1.86°(p=0.001;Cohen's d=-0.36°[-0.65, -0.08])。与 OSA 患者相比,对照组的 BMI(p=0.180)、腰臀比(p=0.280)、颈腰比(p=0.070)、上颌深度角(p=0.250)和上下脸高度比(p=0.070)无显著差异。
与对照组相比,OSA 组颈围的平均差异更大,这是唯一具有高确定性证据的人体测量学指标。