Gulhane Faculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Health Sciences Faculty, Izmir Katip Celebi University, İzmir, Turkey.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2023 Jan;46(1):37-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
The purpose of this review was to compare types of Western massage therapy (MT) to other therapies, placebo, and no-treatment controls in neck pain (NP) in randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials.
An electronic, systematic search was performed in 7 English and 2 Turkish databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SPORTDiscus, Physiotherapy Evidence-Based Database, ULAKBIM National Medical Database, and the Reference Directory of Turkey). The search terms "NP" and "massage" were used. Studies published between January 2012 and July 2021 were searched. Methodological quality was evaluated with Downs and Black Scale and version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.
A total of 932 articles were identified; 8 of them were eligible. The Downs and Black score ranged from 15 to 26 points. Two studies were rated as "fair," 3 studies as "good," and 3 studies as "excellent." According to version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, 3 studies had a low risk of bias, 3 studies had some concerns, and 2 studies had a high risk of bias. Fair evidence found that myofascial release therapy improved pain intensity and pain threshold compared to no intervention in the short term. Excellent evidence found that connective tissue massage with exercise improved pain intensity and pain threshold compared to exercise alone in the short term. No Western MTs were superior to other active therapies according to short-term and immediate effects.
This review suggests that Western MTs (myofascial release therapy and connective tissue massage) may improve NP, but studies are limited. This review showed that Western MTs were not superior to other active therapies for improving NP. The reviewed studies reported only immediate and short-term effects of Western MT; thus, high-quality randomized clinical trials investigating the long-term effects of Western MT are needed.
本综述的目的是比较西方按摩疗法(MT)与其他疗法、安慰剂和无治疗对照在随机和非随机临床试验中治疗颈部疼痛(NP)的效果。
在 7 个英文数据库和 2 个土耳其数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、护理学和联合健康文献累积索引、SPORTDiscus、物理治疗循证数据库、ULAKBIM 国家医学数据库和土耳其参考目录)中进行了电子系统检索。使用的检索词是“NP”和“massage”。检索了 2012 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月期间发表的研究。使用 Downs 和 Black 量表以及 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具第 2 版评估方法学质量。
共确定了 932 篇文章,其中 8 篇符合纳入标准。Downs 和 Black 评分范围为 15 至 26 分。有 2 项研究被评为“中等”,3 项研究为“良好”,3 项研究为“优秀”。根据 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具第 2 版,有 3 项研究为低偏倚风险,3 项研究存在一定关注,2 项研究为高偏倚风险。有中等质量证据表明,与无干预相比,短期肌筋膜释放疗法可改善疼痛强度和疼痛阈值。有高质量证据表明,与单独运动相比,短期结缔组织按摩结合运动可改善疼痛强度和疼痛阈值。根据短期和即时效果,没有西方按摩疗法优于其他主动疗法。
本综述表明,西方 MT(肌筋膜释放疗法和结缔组织按摩)可能改善 NP,但研究有限。本综述表明,西方 MT 并不优于其他主动疗法改善 NP。综述中报道的研究仅报告了西方 MT 的即时和短期效果;因此,需要高质量的随机临床试验来调查西方 MT 的长期效果。