• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病与安全驾驶的关系:文献的系统检索和综述,以及与现行指南的交叉参考。

The association between diabetes and safe driving: A systematic search and review of the literature and cross-reference with the current guidelines.

机构信息

Centre for Applied Health Research, St. Joseph's Care Group, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.

Centre for Research on Safe Driving, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2023 Oct;40(10):e15175. doi: 10.1111/dme.15175. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1111/dme.15175
PMID:37422905
Abstract

AIMS

We conducted this review to characterize the quality of evidence about associations between diabetes and safe driving and to evaluate how these findings are reflected within current guidelines available to support clinicians and their patients with diabetes.

METHODS

The first stage entailed a systematic search and review of the literature. Evidence surrounding harms associated with diabetes and driving was identified, screened, extracted and appraised for quality utilizing the Newcastle Ottawa Scales (NOS). Next, relevant guidelines regarding driving and diabetes were sourced and summarized. Finally, the identified guidelines were cross-referenced with the results of the systematic search and review.

RESULTS

The systematic search yielded 12,461 unique citations; 52 met the criteria for appraisal. Fourteen studies were rated as 'high', two as 'medium' and 36 as 'low'. Studies with ratings of 'high' or 'medium' were extracted, revealing a body of inconsistent methods and findings. These results, cross-referenced with the guidelines, suggest a lack of agreement and a limited evidence base to justify recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

The results presented emphasize the need for a better understanding of the impacts of diabetes on safe driving to inform evidence-based guidelines.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述糖尿病与安全驾驶之间关联的证据质量,并评估这些发现如何反映在当前支持临床医生及其糖尿病患者的指南中。

方法

第一阶段包括系统搜索和文献综述。确定了与糖尿病和驾驶相关的危害相关证据,利用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)对其进行筛选、提取和质量评估。接下来,查找并总结了与驾驶和糖尿病相关的相关指南。最后,将确定的指南与系统搜索和综述的结果进行交叉参考。

结果

系统搜索产生了 12461 条独特的引文;52 条符合评估标准。有 14 项研究被评为“高”,2 项评为“中”,36 项评为“低”。对评分“高”或“中”的研究进行了提取,揭示了方法和发现不一致的情况。这些结果与指南交叉引用表明,缺乏共识和有限的证据基础来支持建议。

结论

提出的结果强调需要更好地了解糖尿病对安全驾驶的影响,以制定基于证据的指南。

相似文献

1
The association between diabetes and safe driving: A systematic search and review of the literature and cross-reference with the current guidelines.糖尿病与安全驾驶的关系:文献的系统检索和综述,以及与现行指南的交叉参考。
Diabet Med. 2023 Oct;40(10):e15175. doi: 10.1111/dme.15175. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
2
Hypoglycaemia and driving in people with insulin-treated diabetes: adherence to recommendations for avoidance.胰岛素治疗糖尿病患者的低血糖与驾驶:对避免低血糖建议的依从性
Diabet Med. 2004 Sep;21(9):1014-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01288.x.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Harvesting experiential expertise to support safe driving for people with diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study evaluated by peers in a survey.从经验中汲取专业知识,支持糖尿病患者安全驾驶:同行在调查中评估的定性研究。
Patient. 2012;5(4):251-64. doi: 10.1007/BF03262497.
6
Safe driving practices and factors associated with motor-vehicle collisions among people with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus: Results from the Diabetes and Driving (DAD) study.胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者与机动车碰撞相关的安全驾驶行为及因素:来自糖尿病与驾驶(DAD)研究的结果。
J Safety Res. 2018 Jun;65:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
7
Effects of benzodiazepines, antidepressants and opioids on driving: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological and experimental evidence.苯二氮䓬类药物、抗抑郁药和阿片类药物对驾驶的影响:流行病学和实验证据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drug Saf. 2011 Feb 1;34(2):125-56. doi: 10.2165/11539050-000000000-00000.
8
Critical appraisal and systematic review of guidelines for perioperative diabetes management: 2011-2017.对 2011-2017 年围手术期糖尿病管理指南的评价和系统评价。
Endocrine. 2019 Feb;63(2):204-212. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1786-y. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
9
Impact of vision disorders and vision impairment on motor vehicle crash risk and on-road driving performance: A systematic review.视力障碍和视力损害对机动车碰撞风险及道路驾驶性能的影响:一项系统综述。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;100(2):e339-e367. doi: 10.1111/aos.14908. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
10
Can patients taking opioids drive safely? A structured evidence-based review.服用阿片类药物的患者能否安全驾驶?一项基于证据的结构化综述。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2002;16(1):9-28.

引用本文的文献

1
Out of Sight, Out of Mind: A Call to Action for the Treatment of Hypoglycemia.眼不见,心不烦:低血糖治疗行动呼吁
Clin Diabetes. 2024 Aug 14;42(4):515-531. doi: 10.2337/cd24-0014. eCollection 2024 Fall.
2
Diabetes mellitus and hard braking events in older adult drivers.老年驾驶员中的糖尿病与急刹车事件
Inj Epidemiol. 2024 Jun 5;11(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40621-024-00508-2.