Suppr超能文献

服用阿片类药物的患者能否安全驾驶?一项基于证据的结构化综述。

Can patients taking opioids drive safely? A structured evidence-based review.

作者信息

Fishbain David A, Cutler R B, Rosomoff H L, Rosomoff R Steele

机构信息

University of Miami School of Medicine, University of Miami Comprehensive Pain and Rehabilitation Center, Miami Beach, FL 33139, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2002;16(1):9-28.

Abstract

A structured evidence-based literature review was completed to determine if there was epidemiological evidence of an association of opioid use and intoxicated driving, motor vehicle accidents (MVA) and MVA fatalities; to rate the quality of this research evidence according to Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) type of evidence and strength and consistency of the evidence rating scales; and according to this evidence determine whether patients taking opioids can drive safely. Relevant references were located from Medline, Psychological Abstracts, Science Citation Index and the National Library of Medicine Data Query databases by appropriate subject headings. A manual search was also performed utilizing the reference lists of the retrieved articles. All references relating to intoxicated driving, MVA and MVA fatalities were retrieved and reviewed in detail. Of these, references addressing opioid use were isolated and research information from these references was placed into tabular form under three major headings: Intoxicated driving and opioids; MVA and opioids; and MVA fatalities and opioids. Data were extracted from these references according to the following format: research question addressed, sample size, statistical analysis and results. The type of evidence each study represented was rated according to the AHCPR type of evidence rating scale. Each research area (intoxicated driving, MVA, MVA fatalities) represented by all the studies in each table was then rated utilizing the strength and consistency of the evidence AHCPR rating scale. Of the 6 reports addressing intoxicated driving, 5 were well designed non-experimental studies and one was a well designed experimental study. All studies in this group reported a prevalence for opioid use which was approximately 1/10 that of the point prevalence use for opioids in the general population. This evidence indicated that opioids probably are not associated with intoxicated driving. Overall, the evidence indicates that opioids are not associated with MVA. Of the 9 studies addressing MVA, 5 were well designed quasi-experimental studies and 4 were well designed experimental studies. All reports in this group except one indicated that opioids are not associated with MVA. Of the 10 studies addressing MVA fatalities, 10 represented Type IV studies. For the vast majority of the studies, the prevalence percentages for an opioid association with MVA fatalities was 1/5 that of the point prevalence percentage for opioid use reported in the general population. Only 1 study reported a possible association between opioid use and MVA fatalities. The evidence in this review indicates that opioids do not appear to be associated with intoxicated driving, MVA and MVA fatalities, and consistently indicated that opioids are not associated with MVA. Although the comparison of point prevalence rates to the point prevalence may be problematic, the results of this systematic review support the contention that patients taking opioids may be allowed to drive. As in all clinical decisions, this determination should be individualized according to clinical factors.

摘要

完成了一项基于证据的结构化文献综述,以确定是否存在阿片类药物使用与醉酒驾驶、机动车事故(MVA)及MVA致死之间关联的流行病学证据;根据医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)的证据类型以及证据评级量表的强度和一致性来评估该研究证据的质量;并根据此证据确定服用阿片类药物的患者能否安全驾驶。通过适当的主题词从Medline、《心理学文摘》、《科学引文索引》和国家医学图书馆数据查询数据库中查找相关参考文献。还利用检索到的文章的参考文献列表进行了人工检索。检索并详细审查了所有与醉酒驾驶、MVA及MVA致死相关的参考文献。其中,筛选出涉及阿片类药物使用的参考文献,并将这些参考文献中的研究信息按照三个主要标题整理成表格形式:醉酒驾驶与阿片类药物;MVA与阿片类药物;以及MVA致死与阿片类药物。根据以下格式从这些参考文献中提取数据:所解决的研究问题、样本量、统计分析和结果。每项研究代表的证据类型根据AHCPR证据评级量表进行评级。然后,利用证据AHCPR评级量表的强度和一致性对每张表格中所有研究代表的每个研究领域(醉酒驾驶、MVA、MVA致死)进行评级。在涉及醉酒驾驶的6份报告中,5份是设计良好的非实验性研究,1份是设计良好的实验性研究。该组中的所有研究均报告阿片类药物使用的患病率约为普通人群中阿片类药物点患病率的1/10。这一证据表明阿片类药物可能与醉酒驾驶无关。总体而言,证据表明阿片类药物与MVA无关。在涉及MVA的9项研究中,5项是设计良好的准实验性研究,4项是设计良好的实验性研究。该组中除一份报告外的所有报告均表明阿片类药物与MVA无关。在涉及MVA致死的10项研究中,10项为IV型研究。对于绝大多数研究,阿片类药物与MVA致死相关的患病率百分比是普通人群中报告的阿片类药物使用点患病率百分比的1/5。只有1项研究报告了阿片类药物使用与MVA致死之间可能存在关联。本综述中的证据表明,阿片类药物似乎与醉酒驾驶、MVA及MVA致死无关,并且一直表明阿片类药物与MVA无关。尽管将点患病率与点患病率进行比较可能存在问题,但该系统综述的结果支持这样的观点,即服用阿片类药物的患者可能被允许驾驶。与所有临床决策一样,这一决定应根据临床因素进行个体化判断。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验