• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝达喹啉联合化疗方案治疗中国耐多药结核病的成本效果分析。

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Combined Chemotherapy Regimen Containing Bedaquiline in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in China.

机构信息

National Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, China CDC, Beijing 100226, China.

China National Health Development Research Center, Beijing 100226, China;The University of Sheffield, S10 2TN, Sheffield, The United Kingdom.

出版信息

Biomed Environ Sci. 2023 Jun 20;36(6):501-509. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.061.

DOI:10.3967/bes2023.061
PMID:37424243
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the combined chemotherapy regimen containing Bedaquiline (BR) and the conventional treatment regimen (CR, not containing Bedaquiline) for the treatment of adults with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in China.

METHODS

A combination of a decision tree and a Markov model was developed to estimate the cost and effects of MDR patients in BR and CR within ten years. The model parameter data were synthesized from the literature, the national TB surveillance information system, and consultation with experts. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of BR . CR was determined.

RESULTS

BR ( . CR) had a higher sputum culture conversion rate and cure rate and prevented many premature deaths (decreased by 12.8%), thereby obtaining more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (increased by 2.31 years). The per capita cost in BR was as high as 138,000 yuan, roughly double that of CR. The ICER for BR was 33,700 yuan/QALY, which was lower than China's 1× per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2020 (72,400 yuan).

CONCLUSION

BR is shown to be cost effective. When the unit price of Bedaquiline reaches or falls below 57.21 yuan per unit, BR is expected to be the dominant strategy in China over CR.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估贝达喹啉(BR)联合化疗方案与不包含贝达喹啉的常规治疗方案(CR)治疗中国成人耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)的成本效益。

方法

采用决策树和马尔可夫模型相结合的方法,估算 BR 和 CR 治疗方案下 MDR 患者十年内的成本和效果。模型参数数据综合了文献、全国结核病监测信息系统和专家咨询结果。BR 与 CR 的增量成本效益比(ICER)。

结果

BR(CR)具有更高的痰培养转化率和治愈率,预防了许多过早死亡(减少 12.8%),从而获得了更多的质量调整生命年(增加 2.31 年)。BR 的人均成本高达 13.8 万元,是 CR 的两倍左右。BR 的 ICER 为 33700 元/QALY,低于中国 2020 年人均国内生产总值(GDP)的 1 倍(72400 元)。

结论

BR 具有成本效益。当贝达喹啉的单价达到或低于 57.21 元/单位时,BR 有望成为中国比 CR 更具优势的治疗策略。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Combined Chemotherapy Regimen Containing Bedaquiline in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in China.贝达喹啉联合化疗方案治疗中国耐多药结核病的成本效果分析。
Biomed Environ Sci. 2023 Jun 20;36(6):501-509. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.061.
2
Cost-effectiveness of adding novel or group 5 interventions to a background regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Germany.在德国,将新型或第5组干预措施添加到背景治疗方案中用于治疗耐多药结核病的成本效益。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 8;17(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2118-2.
3
Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline or delamanid plus background regimen for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a high-income intermediate burden city of China.中国高收入中等负担城市中贝达喹啉或德拉马尼加背景方案治疗耐多药结核病的成本效益。
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;78:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
4
Cost-effectiveness of adding bedaquiline to drug regimens for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the UK.在英国,将贝达喹啉添加到治疗耐多药结核病的药物方案中的成本效益。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120763. eCollection 2015.
5
Health outcomes of bedaquiline in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in selected high burden countries.在部分高负担国家中,贝达喹啉治疗耐多药结核病的健康结局。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1931-3.
6
Incremental Cost Effectiveness of Bedaquiline for the Treatment of Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis in South Africa: Model-Based Analysis.贝达喹啉治疗南非利福平耐药结核病的增量成本效果:基于模型的分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Feb;16(1):43-54. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0352-8.
7
The cost-effectiveness of a bedaquiline-containing short-course regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa.南非含贝达喹啉短程方案治疗耐多药结核病的成本效果分析。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 May;18(5):475-483. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1742109. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
8
Cost effectiveness of treating multi-drug resistant tuberculosis by adding Deltyba™ to background regimens in Germany.在德国,在背景治疗方案中添加Deltyba™治疗耐多药结核病的成本效益
Respir Med. 2015 May;109(5):632-41. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
9
Cost-effectiveness of Bedaquiline for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis in the Republic of Korea.贝达喹啉治疗韩国耐多药结核病的成本效益
Clin Ther. 2016 Mar;38(3):655-67.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.01.023. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
10
Early outcome and safety of bedaquiline-containing regimens for treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB in China: a multicentre study.中国含贝达喹啉方案治疗耐多药和广泛耐药结核病的早期结局和安全性:一项多中心研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Apr;27(4):597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of multidrug-resistant tracheobronchial tuberculosis receiving anti-tuberculosis regimens containing bedaquiline or delamanid.含贝达喹啉或德拉马尼方案治疗耐多药支气管结核的临床结局。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 29;14(1):17347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68550-0.
2
The efficacy and safety of high-dose isoniazid-containing therapy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.含高剂量异烟肼治疗耐多药结核病的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1331371. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1331371. eCollection 2023.