• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非含贝达喹啉短程方案治疗耐多药结核病的成本效果分析。

The cost-effectiveness of a bedaquiline-containing short-course regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa.

机构信息

Johnson & Johnson Global Public Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Janssen Pharmaceutical South Africa, Pharmaceutical Division of Johnson and Johnson, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 May;18(5):475-483. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1742109. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1080/14787210.2020.1742109
PMID:32186925
Abstract

: Bedaquiline-containing regimens have demonstrated improved outcomes over injectable-containing regimens in the long-term treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended replacing injectables in the standard short-course regimen (SCR) with a bedaquiline-containing regimen. The South African national TB program similarly recommends a bedaquiline-containing regimen. Here, we investigated the cost-effectiveness of a bedaquiline-containing SCR versus an injectable-containing SCR for the treatment of MDR-TB in South Africa.: A Markov model was adapted to simulate the incidence of active patients with MDR-TB. Patients could transition through eight health states: active MDR-TB, culture conversion, cure, follow-up loss, secondary MDR-TB, extensively DR-TB, end-of-life care, and death. A 5% discount was assumed on costs and outcomes. Health outcomes were expressed as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).: Over a 10-year time horizon, a bedaquiline-containing SCR dominated an injectable-containing SCR, with an incremental saving of US $982 per DALY averted. A bedaquiline-containing SCR was associated with lower total costs versus an injectable-containing SCR (US $597 versus $657 million), of which US $3.2 versus $21.9 million was attributed to adverse event management.: Replacing an injectable-containing SCR with a bedaquiline-containing SCR is cost-effective, offering a cost-saving alternative with improved patient outcomes for MDR-TB.

摘要

: 包含贝达喹啉的方案在耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)的长期治疗中,相较于包含注射剂的方案,在改善结局方面显示出了优势。最近,世界卫生组织(WHO)建议用包含贝达喹啉的方案替代标准短程化疗方案(SCR)中的注射剂。南非国家结核病规划也建议使用包含贝达喹啉的方案。在此,我们研究了南非使用包含贝达喹啉的 SCR 方案与使用包含注射剂的 SCR 方案治疗 MDR-TB 的成本效益。: 我们采用马尔可夫模型来模拟耐多药结核病活动患者的发病率。患者可在八种健康状态之间转换:耐多药结核病活动期、培养转阴、治愈、随访丢失、继发性耐多药结核病、广泛耐药结核病、临终关怀和死亡。假设成本和结果均有 5%的折扣。健康结果用残疾调整生命年(DALYs)表示。: 在 10 年的时间范围内,包含贝达喹啉的 SCR 方案优于包含注射剂的 SCR 方案,每避免一个 DALY 可额外节省 982 美元。相较于包含注射剂的 SCR 方案,包含贝达喹啉的 SCR 方案总成本更低(5.97 亿美元对 6.57 亿美元),其中 3200 万美元对 2.19 亿美元归因于不良事件管理。: 用包含贝达喹啉的 SCR 方案替代包含注射剂的 SCR 方案具有成本效益,为耐多药结核病患者提供了更优的治疗选择,同时还节约了成本,改善了患者结局。

相似文献

1
The cost-effectiveness of a bedaquiline-containing short-course regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa.南非含贝达喹啉短程方案治疗耐多药结核病的成本效果分析。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 May;18(5):475-483. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1742109. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
2
Incremental Cost Effectiveness of Bedaquiline for the Treatment of Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis in South Africa: Model-Based Analysis.贝达喹啉治疗南非利福平耐药结核病的增量成本效果:基于模型的分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Feb;16(1):43-54. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0352-8.
3
Health outcomes of bedaquiline in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in selected high burden countries.在部分高负担国家中,贝达喹啉治疗耐多药结核病的健康结局。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1931-3.
4
Impact of adverse drug reactions on the incremental cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline for drug-resistant tuberculosis.药物不良反应对贝达喹啉治疗耐药性结核病增量成本效果的影响。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Aug 1;22(8):918-925. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0869.
5
Bedaquiline- versus injectable-containing drug-resistant tuberculosis regimens: a cost-effectiveness analysis.贝达喹啉与含注射剂的耐多药结核病治疗方案:成本效益分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Dec;18(6):677-689. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1507821. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
6
Cost-effectiveness of adding novel or group 5 interventions to a background regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Germany.在德国,将新型或第5组干预措施添加到背景治疗方案中用于治疗耐多药结核病的成本效益。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 8;17(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2118-2.
7
Cost-effectiveness of adding bedaquiline to drug regimens for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the UK.在英国,将贝达喹啉添加到治疗耐多药结核病的药物方案中的成本效益。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120763. eCollection 2015.
8
Cost comparison of nine-month treatment regimens with 20-month standardized care for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant/multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in Nigeria.尼日利亚利福平耐药/耐多药结核病 9 个月治疗方案与 20 个月标准化护理成本比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0241065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241065. eCollection 2020.
9
Cost-effectiveness of incorporating bedaquiline into a treatment regimen for MDR/XDR-TB in Germany.在德国,将贝达喹啉纳入耐多药/广泛耐药结核病治疗方案的成本效益分析。
Eur Respir J. 2015 Dec;46(6):1826-9. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00811-2015. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
10
Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid for treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa, Georgia and the Philippines.贝达喹啉、普托马尼德和利奈唑胺治疗南非、格鲁吉亚和菲律宾广泛耐药结核病的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e051521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051521.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of financial support on treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A population-based, retrospective cohort study in Shanghai, China.财政支持对耐多药结核病治疗结果的影响:一项基于人群的中国上海回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2024 Nov 29;37:100500. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100500. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Drug-resistant tuberculosis care and treatment outcomes over the last 15 years in Ethiopia: Results from a mixed-method review of trends.过去 15 年在埃塞俄比亚的耐药结核病护理和治疗结果:趋势的混合方法综述结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0306076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306076. eCollection 2024.
3
Rethinking Tuberculosis Morbidity Quantification: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of TB Disability Weights in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.
重新思考结核病发病率量化:成本效益分析中结核病残疾权重的系统评价和批判性评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Nov;42(11):1209-1236. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01410-x. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
4
A systematic review of economic evaluations of pharmacological treatments for active tuberculosis.一项关于抗结核药物治疗的经济学评价的系统综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 16;12:1201512. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1201512. eCollection 2024.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of All-Oral Regimens for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Korea: Comparison With Conventional Injectable-Containing Regimens.韩国多药耐药结核病全口服治疗方案的成本效益:与含传统注射剂方案的比较。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 May 29;38(21):e167. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e167.
6
Randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of varying doses of linezolid with bedaquiline and pretomanid in adults with pre-extensively drug-resistant or treatment intolerant/non-responsive multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: study protocol.一项评价不同剂量利奈唑胺联合贝达喹啉和普托马尼治疗预广泛耐药或不耐受/无应答的耐多药肺结核成人患者的有效性和安全性的随机试验:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e058606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058606.
7
Bedaquiline-based treatment for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa: A cost-effectiveness analysis.贝达喹啉为基础的方案治疗南非广泛耐药结核病:成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0272770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272770. eCollection 2022.
8
Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid for treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa, Georgia and the Philippines.贝达喹啉、普托马尼德和利奈唑胺治疗南非、格鲁吉亚和菲律宾广泛耐药结核病的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e051521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051521.
9
Costs of multidrug-resistant TB treatment in Finland and Estonia affected by the 2019 WHO guidelines.芬兰和爱沙尼亚的耐多药结核病治疗费用受 2019 年世卫组织指南影响。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2021 Jul 1;25(7):554-559. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.20.0892.
10
Trends, Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Uzbekistan: 2013-2018.乌兹别克斯坦耐药结核病患者的趋势、特征和治疗结果:2013-2018 年。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(9):4663. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094663.