• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于经皮左心耳封堵术前规划的心脏磁共振成像

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for preprocedural planning of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.

作者信息

Bertsche Dagmar, Metze Patrick, Luo Erfei, Dahme Tillman, Gonska Birgid, Rottbauer Wolfgang, Vernikouskaya Ina, Rasche Volker, Schneider Leonhard M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine II, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 23;10:1132626. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1132626. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1132626
PMID:37424915
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10326314/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) facilitates stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Optimal device selection and positioning are often challenging due to highly variable LAA shape and dimension and thus require accurate assessment of the respective anatomy. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and x-ray fluoroscopy (XR) represent the gold standard imaging techniques. However, device underestimation has frequently been observed. Assessment based on 3-dimensional computer tomography (CTA) has been reported as more accurate but increases radiation and contrast agent burden. In this study, the use of non-contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to support preprocedural planning for LAA closure (LAAc) was investigated.

METHODS

CMR was performed in thirteen patients prior to LAAc. Based on the 3-dimensional CMR image data, the dimensions of the LAA were quantified and optimal C-arm angulations were determined and compared to periprocedural data. Quantitative figures used for evaluation of the technique comprised the maximum diameter, the diameter derived from perimeter and the area of the landing zone of the LAA.

RESULTS

Perimeter- and area-based diameters derived from preprocedural CMR showed excellent congruency compared to those measured periprocedurally by XR, whereas the respective maximum diameter resulted in significant overestimation ( < 0.05). Compared to TEE assessment, CMR-derived diameters resulted in significantly larger dimensions ( < 0.05). The deviation of the maximum diameter to the diameters measured by XR and TEE correlated well with the ovality of the LAA. C-arm angulations used during the procedures were in agreement with those determined by CMR in case of circular LAA.

DISCUSSION

This small pilot study demonstrates the potential of non-contrast-enhanced CMR to support preprocedural planning of LAAc. Diameter measurements based on LAA area and perimeter correlated well with the actual device selection parameters. CMR-derived determination of landing zones facilitated accurate C-arm angulation for optimal device positioning.

摘要

引言

经皮左心耳封堵术有助于预防心房颤动患者发生中风。由于左心耳的形状和尺寸高度可变,最佳器械的选择和定位往往具有挑战性,因此需要准确评估相应的解剖结构。经食管超声心动图(TEE)和X线透视(XR)是金标准成像技术。然而,器械低估的情况经常出现。据报道,基于三维计算机断层扫描(CTA)的评估更为准确,但会增加辐射和造影剂负担。在本研究中,探讨了使用非增强心脏磁共振成像(CMR)来支持左心耳封堵术(LAAc)的术前规划。

方法

在13例患者进行LAAc术前进行CMR检查。基于三维CMR图像数据,对左心耳的尺寸进行量化,并确定最佳C形臂角度,并与围手术期数据进行比较。用于评估该技术的定量指标包括左心耳的最大直径、由周长得出的直径以及着陆区面积。

结果

与术中通过XR测量的直径相比,术前CMR得出的基于周长和面积的直径具有极好的一致性,而相应的最大直径则被显著高估(<0.05)。与TEE评估相比,CMR得出的直径明显更大(<0.05)。最大直径与XR和TEE测量的直径之间的偏差与左心耳的椭圆度密切相关。在圆形左心耳的情况下,术中使用的C形臂角度与CMR确定的角度一致。

讨论

这项小型试点研究证明了非增强CMR在支持LAAc术前规划方面的潜力。基于左心耳面积和周长的直径测量与实际器械选择参数密切相关。通过CMR确定着陆区有助于准确的C形臂角度调整,以实现最佳器械定位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/849025402a38/fcvm-10-1132626-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/18ded52d7935/fcvm-10-1132626-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/3fe08c827b5a/fcvm-10-1132626-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/7f32a2b0030f/fcvm-10-1132626-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/908302d58477/fcvm-10-1132626-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/a5a39b9d2432/fcvm-10-1132626-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/b293d5a225cc/fcvm-10-1132626-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/849025402a38/fcvm-10-1132626-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/18ded52d7935/fcvm-10-1132626-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/3fe08c827b5a/fcvm-10-1132626-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/7f32a2b0030f/fcvm-10-1132626-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/908302d58477/fcvm-10-1132626-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/a5a39b9d2432/fcvm-10-1132626-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/b293d5a225cc/fcvm-10-1132626-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8274/10326314/849025402a38/fcvm-10-1132626-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for preprocedural planning of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.用于经皮左心耳封堵术前规划的心脏磁共振成像
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 23;10:1132626. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1132626. eCollection 2023.
2
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left atrial appendage closure planning.心脏磁共振成像在左心耳封堵规划中的应用。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Jul;46(7):745-751. doi: 10.1111/pace.14713. Epub 2023 May 24.
3
Feasibility and Accuracy of Automated Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Analysis of Left Atrial Appendage for Transcatheter Closure.经导管闭合左心耳的自动化三维超声心动图分析的可行性和准确性。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2022 Jan;35(1):124-133. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2021.08.023. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
4
Safety and effects of volume loading during transesophageal echocardiography in the pre-procedural work-up for left atrial appendage closure.经食管超声心动图在左心耳封堵术术前准备中容量负荷的安全性和效果。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2021 Jan 2;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12947-020-00230-1.
5
A comparative study of different imaging modalities for successful percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.不同成像方式用于经皮左心耳封堵术成功实施的对比研究
Open Heart. 2017 Jun 30;4(2):e000627. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000627. eCollection 2017.
6
Comparing Measurements of CT Angiography, TEE, and Fluoroscopy of the Left Atrial Appendage for Percutaneous Closure.经皮封堵术治疗时左心耳CT血管造影、经食管超声心动图和荧光透视检查测量结果的比较
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr;27(4):414-22. doi: 10.1111/jce.12909. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
7
Validation of a computational model aiming to optimize preprocedural planning in percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.验证一种旨在优化经皮左心耳封堵术术前规划的计算模型。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Mar-Apr;14(2):149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
8
A comparison of two-dimensional and real-time 3D transoesophageal echocardiography and angiography for assessing the left atrial appendage anatomy for sizing a left atrial appendage occlusion system: impact of volume loading.二维和实时三维经食管超声心动图与血管造影术在评估左心耳解剖结构以确定左心耳封堵系统尺寸方面的比较:容量负荷的影响
EuroIntervention. 2017 Apr 20;12(17):2083-2091. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00543.
9
A Comparative Study of Three Imaging Modalities for Size Selection of a Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device.三种影像学方法在 Watchman 左心耳封堵装置型号选择中的对比研究。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Apr;63(4):325-332. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.4.325.
10
A Comparison of Cardiac Computed Tomography, Transesophageal and Intracardiac Echocardiography, and Fluoroscopy for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Closure.心脏计算机断层扫描、经食管和心内超声心动图以及荧光透视检查在左心耳封堵术规划中的比较
J Atr Fibrillation. 2021 Apr 30;13(6):20200449. doi: 10.4022/jafib.20200449. eCollection 2021 Apr-May.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive evaluation of the left atrium using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.使用心血管磁共振对左心房进行全面评估。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025 Feb 5;27(1):101852. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101852.
2
A Comprehensive Review of Percutaneous and Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.经皮和外科左心耳封堵术的综合综述
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jul 27;11(8):234. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11080234.

本文引用的文献

1
3D localization from 2D X-ray projection.从 2D X 射线投影进行 3D 定位。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Sep;17(9):1553-1558. doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02709-w. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
Anatomy of the left atrial appendage for the interventional cardiologist.介入心脏病学家的左心耳解剖。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2022 Jun;33(2):195-202. doi: 10.1007/s00399-022-00866-8. Epub 2022 May 23.
3
Improving Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device Size Determination by Three-Dimensional Printing-Based Preprocedural Simulation.
通过基于三维打印的术前模拟改善左心耳封堵器尺寸的确定
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 16;9:830062. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.830062. eCollection 2022.
4
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2022 更新:美国心脏协会报告》。
Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
5
Pre-procedural determination of device size in left atrial appendage occlusion using three-dimensional cardiac computed tomography.术前应用三维心脏 CT 确定左心耳封堵装置的大小。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 16;11(1):24107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03537-9.
6
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Stroke Prevention in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.左心耳封堵术预防非瓣膜性心房颤动所致卒中。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 2;10(21):e022274. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022274. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
7
Pre- and Postprocedural CT of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices.经导管左心耳封堵装置的术前和术后 CT
Radiographics. 2021 May-Jun;41(3):680-698. doi: 10.1148/rg.2021200136.
8
Primary Outcome Evaluation of a Next-Generation Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device: Results From the PINNACLE FLX Trial.新一代左心耳封堵装置的主要结局评估:PINNACLE FLX 试验结果。
Circulation. 2021 May 4;143(18):1754-1762. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050117. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
9
3D-XGuide: open-source X-ray navigation guidance system.3D-XGuide:开源 X 射线导航引导系统。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Jan;16(1):53-63. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02274-0. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
10
MDCT planning of trans catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): determination of optimal c-arm angulation.多排螺旋 CT 规划经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI):确定最佳 C 臂角度。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Aug;36(8):1551-1557. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01846-0. Epub 2020 Apr 18.