National Research Center Named after Academician E.N. Meshalkin, Novosibirsk, Russia.
A.M. Nikiforov All-Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine, St-Petersburg, Russia.
Sci Prog. 2023 Jul-Sep;106(3):368504231182834. doi: 10.1177/00368504231182834.
This phase III, controlled, patient-blinded, multicentre study in two parallel, equal-sized treatment groups compared the efficacy and safety of TISSEEL Lyo, fibrin sealant versus Manual Compression (MC) with surgical gauze pads for use as a haemostatic agent in patients who underwent vascular surgery in Russia.
Adult patients, both genders, who received peripheral vascular expanded polytetrafluoroethylene conduits and had suture line bleeding after surgical haemostasis were enrolled. Patients were randomized to be treated with TISSEEL Lyo or MC. The bleeding needed additional treatment and had to be assessed as grade 1 or 2 bleeding according to the Validated Intraoperative Bleeding scale. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving haemostasis at 4 min after treatment application (T) at the study suture line, which was maintained until the closure of the surgical wound. The secondary efficacy endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving haemostasis at 6 min (T) and 10 min (T) after treatment application at the study suture line, which was maintained until closure of the surgical wound, as well as the proportion of patients with intraoperative and postoperative rebleeding. Safety outcomes included incidence of adverse events (AEs), surgical site infections and graft occlusions.
A total of 110 patients were screened; 104 patients were randomized: (TISSEEL Lyo: 51 [49%] patients; MC: 53 [51%] patients). T haemostasis was achieved in 43 (84.3%) patients in the TISSEEL Lyo group and in 11 (20.8%) patients in the MC group ( < 0.001). Significantly more patients in TISSEEL Lyo group achieved the haemostasis at T (relative risk (RR) of achieving haemostasis 1.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37; 2.35]) and T (RR 1.18 [95% CI 1.05; 1.38]) versus MC. No one had intraoperative rebleeding. Postoperative rebleeding was reported only in one patient in the MC group. No treatment-emergent serious AEs (TESAEs) related to TISSEEL Lyo/MC, TESAEs leading to withdrawal and TESAEs leading to death were reported in patients during the study.
Data demonstrated TISSEEL Lyo had clinically and statistically significant superiority to MC as a haemostatic agent in vascular surgery at all measured time points including 4, 6 and 10 min and had proven to be safe.
本项 III 期、对照、患者设盲、多中心研究在两组平行、等量的治疗组中进行,比较了泰绫 Lyo 纤维蛋白胶与手术纱布垫(MC)在接受俄罗斯血管外科手术的患者中的疗效和安全性。
本研究纳入了接受外周血管膨化聚四氟乙烯移植物且术后止血缝线部位出血的成年患者(男女不限)。患者随机接受泰绫 Lyo 或 MC 治疗。出血需要额外治疗,并根据经验证的术中出血量表(Validated Intraoperative Bleeding scale)评估为 1 级或 2 级出血。主要疗效终点为治疗后 4 分钟(T)时研究缝线处达到止血的患者比例,该比例一直维持到手术切口关闭。次要疗效终点包括治疗后 6 分钟(T)和 10 分钟(T)时研究缝线处达到止血的患者比例,该比例一直维持到手术切口关闭,以及术中及术后再出血的患者比例。安全性结局包括不良事件(AE)、手术部位感染和移植物闭塞的发生率。
共筛选了 110 例患者;104 例患者被随机分组:(泰绫 Lyo:51 例[49%];MC:53 例[51%])。在泰绫 Lyo 组中,43 例(84.3%)患者达到 T 期止血,而在 MC 组中,11 例(20.8%)患者达到 T 期止血(<0.001)。泰绫 Lyo 组达到 T 期(达到止血的相对风险(RR)为 1.74[95%置信区间(CI)1.37;2.35])和 T 期(RR 1.18[95%CI 1.05;1.38])止血的患者比例显著高于 MC 组。两组均无术中再出血。MC 组仅 1 例患者报告术后再出血。在研究期间,未报告与泰绫 Lyo/MC 相关的治疗出现的严重不良事件(TESAEs)、导致退出的 TESAEs 和导致死亡的 TESAEs。
数据表明,在所有测量时间点(包括 4、6 和 10 分钟),泰绫 Lyo 在血管外科中作为止血剂的疗效明显优于 MC,且安全性良好。