Shichman Ittai, Lawrence Kyle W, Berzolla Emily, Hernandez Carlos Sandoval, Man-El Rani, Warschawski Yaniv, Snir Nimrod, Schwarzkopf Ran, Hepinstall Matthew S
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, 301 East 17Th Street, 14Th Floor Suite 1402, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel- Aviv, Israel.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Nov;143(11):6945-6954. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04944-5. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
Comparison between fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stems with differing geometry are lacking in the total hip arthroplasty (THA) literature. This study aimed to compare femoral canal fill, radiolucency formation, and 2-year implant survivorship between two commonly used, HA-coated stems.
All primary THAs performed with two fully HA-coated stems (Polar stem, Smith&Nephew, Memphis, TN and Corail stem, DePuy-Synthes, Warsaw, IN) with a minimum 2-year radiographic follow-up were identified. Radiographic measures of proximal femoral morphology based on the Dorr classification and femoral canal fill were analyzed. Radiolucent lines were identified by Gruen zone. Perioperative characteristics and 2-year survivorship were compared between stem types.
A total of 233 patients were identified with 132 (56.7%) receiving the Polar stem (P) and 101 (43.3%) receiving the Corail stem (C). No differences were observed with respect to proximal femoral morphology. Femoral stem canal fill at the middle third of the stem was greater for P stem patients than for C stem patients (P stem; 0.80 ± 0.08 vs. C stem; 0.77 ± 0.08, p = 0.002), while femoral stem canal fill at the distal third of the stem and presence of subsidence were comparable between groups. A total of six and nine radiolucencies were observed in P stem and C stem patients, respectively. Revision rate at 2-year (P stem; 1.5% vs C stem; 0.0%, p = 0.51) and latest follow-up (P stem; 1.5% vs C stem; 1.0%, p = 0.72) did not differ between groups.
Greater canal fill at the middle third of the stem was observed for the P stem compared to the C stem, however, both stems demonstrated robust and comparable freedom from revision at 2-year and latest follow-up, with low incidences of radiolucent line formation. Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes for these commonly used, fully HA-coated stems remain equally promising in THA despite variations in canal fill.
全髋关节置换术(THA)文献中缺乏对不同几何形状的全羟基磷灰石(HA)涂层柄的比较。本研究旨在比较两种常用的HA涂层柄在股骨髓腔填充、透亮线形成以及2年植入物生存率方面的差异。
确定所有使用两种全HA涂层柄(极地柄,施乐辉公司,田纳西州孟菲斯市;珊瑚柄,德普伊-辛迪斯公司,印第安纳州华沙市)进行的初次THA病例,且至少有2年的影像学随访资料。基于多尔分类法对股骨近端形态进行影像学测量,并分析股骨髓腔填充情况。通过Gruen分区确定透亮线。比较两种柄型的围手术期特征和2年生存率。
共确定233例患者,其中132例(56.7%)接受极地柄(P),101例(43.3%)接受珊瑚柄(C)。股骨近端形态方面未观察到差异。P柄患者在柄中部三分之一处的股骨髓腔填充大于C柄患者(P柄;0.80±0.08 vs. C柄;0.77±0.08,p = 0.002),而两组在柄远端三分之一处的股骨髓腔填充及下沉情况相当。P柄和C柄患者分别观察到6处和9处透亮线。两组在2年时的翻修率(P柄;1.5% vs C柄;0.0%,p = 0.51)以及末次随访时的翻修率(P柄;1.5% vs C柄;1.0%,p = 0.72)无差异。
与C柄相比,P柄在柄中部三分之一处的髓腔填充更大,然而,两种柄在2年及末次随访时均表现出良好且相当的翻修自由度,透亮线形成发生率较低。尽管髓腔填充存在差异,但这些常用的全HA涂层柄在THA中的中期临床和影像学结果同样令人满意。