Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾残端的闭合:单圈套扎 vs. 双圈套扎 vs. 双夹闭——有区别吗?

Appendiceal stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy: one endoloop vs. two endoloops vs. two endoclips-does it matter?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Meir Medical Center, Affiliated with the Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jul 10;408(1):270. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03012-1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Appendiceal stump leak rate after laparoscopic appendectomy is extremely low. Various methods are used to close the appendiceal stump. This study aimed to compare the outcome of three appendiceal stump closure methods.

METHODS

A retrospective study comparing stump closure methods and postoperative outcomes was conducted from January 2018 to June 2020. Patient data included demographics, pre-operative data, surgical technique, findings, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Out of 1021 appendectomy patients, 733 underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis utilizing one of the three compared appendiceal stump closure methods. Consequently, 360 appendixes were ligated with one endoloop (1EL group), 300 appendixes had two endoloops (2EL group), and 73 appendixes were ligated with two endoclips (2EC group). All groups used a LigaSure for resection. The rate of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess was 1% (4 patients) in 1EL group vs. 1% (3 patients) in 2EL group vs. none in 2EC group (p = 0.43). There were no reported appendiceal stump leaks. Overall complication rates were 4% (14 patients), 3% (9 patients), and 0 (p = 0.15), and the mean operative length was 43 ± 21, 54 ± 22, and 43 ± 20 mins for the 1EL, 2EL, and 2EC, respectively (p < 0.01). Average cost of one endoloop is 110$, and one endoclip cartridge is 180$.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the methods were found clinically superior over the others. Considering the low and mild complication rate, it appears reasonable to prefer one method simply by cost. The use of a single endoloop may result in substantial cost reduction. Medical centers may advise surgeons to use a single-endoloop technique.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜阑尾切除术后阑尾残端漏的发生率极低。有多种方法可用于闭合阑尾残端。本研究旨在比较三种阑尾残端闭合方法的结果。

方法

回顾性比较了 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间三种阑尾残端闭合方法和术后结果。患者数据包括人口统计学、术前数据、手术技术、发现和术后并发症。

结果

在 1021 例阑尾切除术患者中,733 例因急性阑尾炎接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术,其中 360 例阑尾结扎使用单端环(1EL 组),300 例阑尾结扎使用双端环(2EL 组),73 例阑尾结扎使用双端夹(2EC 组)。所有组均使用 LigaSure 进行切除。1EL 组术后腹腔脓肿发生率为 1%(4 例),2EL 组为 1%(3 例),2EC 组无脓肿(p = 0.43)。无阑尾残端漏报道。总并发症发生率为 4%(14 例)、3%(9 例)和 0(p = 0.15),1EL、2EL 和 2EC 组的平均手术时间分别为 43 ± 21、54 ± 22 和 43 ± 20 分钟(p < 0.01)。一个单端环的成本为 110 美元,一个双端夹的成本为 180 美元。

结论

没有一种方法在临床上被发现优于其他方法。考虑到低且轻微的并发症发生率,根据成本选择一种方法似乎是合理的。使用单端环可能会带来显著的成本降低。医疗中心可能会建议外科医生使用单端环技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验