• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚全科医疗中的常规发育筛查:一项试点研究。

Routine developmental screening in Australian general practice: a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jul 10;24(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02093-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-023-02093-7
PMID:37430184
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10331965/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status, (PEDS), is a validated screening tool designed for primary health care clinicians to assess child development. Despite widespread use by local government child-nurse services, PEDS has not been tested in Australian general practice. We examined the effect of an intervention that aimed to use PEDS to improve documented assessment of child developmental status during routine general practice consultations.

METHODS

The study took place in a single general practice in Melbourne, Australia. The intervention included training of all general practice staff regarding PEDS processes and provision of PEDS questionnaires, scoring and interpretation forms. Mixed methods incorporated audits of clinical records of young children (1 to ≤ 5 years) before and after the intervention, and written questionnaires and a focus group (informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model) with receptionists, practice nurses and general practitioners.

RESULTS

Documented developmental status more than doubled after the intervention with almost one in three (30.4%) records documenting the PEDS tool. Overall, staff responses to questionnaires indicated that PEDS processes had been successfully implemented, half of the staff felt PEDS had developed their professional skills and clinicians expressed confidence using the tool (71%). Thematic analysis of the focus group transcript revealed divided reactions to PEDS screening with most barriers arising from general practitioners' motivation to use PEDS tools and perceptions of environmental constraints.

CONCLUSIONS

A team-practice intervention that applied PEDS training and implementation, more than doubled documented rates of child developmental status during routine visits. Solutions to underlying barriers could be incorporated into a revised training module. Future studies need to test the tool in more methodologically robust studies that include analysis of the outcomes of developmental surveillance and long-term sustainability of PEDS use in practices.

摘要

背景

家长发育评估(PEDS)是一种经验证的筛查工具,专为初级保健临床医生设计,用于评估儿童发育情况。尽管当地政府儿童护士服务广泛使用,但 PEDS 在澳大利亚全科医学实践中尚未经过测试。我们研究了一项干预措施的效果,该措施旨在使用 PEDS 改进常规全科医学咨询中儿童发育状况的记录评估。

方法

该研究在澳大利亚墨尔本的一家全科诊所进行。该干预措施包括对所有全科医学工作人员进行 PEDS 流程培训,并提供 PEDS 问卷、评分和解释表。混合方法包括在干预前后对幼儿(1 至 ≤5 岁)的临床记录进行审核,以及对接待员、执业护士和全科医生进行书面问卷调查和焦点小组(以理论领域框架和 COM-B 模型为依据)。

结果

干预后,记录的发育状况增加了一倍多,几乎有三分之一(30.4%)的记录记录了 PEDS 工具。总体而言,工作人员对问卷调查的回应表明,PEDS 流程已成功实施,一半的工作人员认为 PEDS 提高了他们的专业技能,临床医生表示有信心使用该工具(71%)。焦点小组记录的专题分析显示,对 PEDS 筛查的反应存在分歧,大多数障碍源于全科医生使用 PEDS 工具的动机和对环境限制的看法。

结论

一项团队实践干预措施应用了 PEDS 培训和实施,使常规就诊期间记录的儿童发育状况增加了一倍多。可以将解决潜在障碍的方法纳入修订后的培训模块中。未来的研究需要在更具方法学稳健性的研究中测试该工具,包括对发育监测结果和 PEDS 在实践中的长期可持续性进行分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/10331965/7b07f53ba2f3/12875_2023_2093_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/10331965/89ba2300e47f/12875_2023_2093_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/10331965/ef6a42d36666/12875_2023_2093_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/10331965/a66b1504462b/12875_2023_2093_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/10331965/9c0516b8551d/12875_2023_2093_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/10331965/7b07f53ba2f3/12875_2023_2093_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/10331965/89ba2300e47f/12875_2023_2093_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/10331965/ef6a42d36666/12875_2023_2093_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/10331965/a66b1504462b/12875_2023_2093_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/10331965/9c0516b8551d/12875_2023_2093_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/10331965/7b07f53ba2f3/12875_2023_2093_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Routine developmental screening in Australian general practice: a pilot study.澳大利亚全科医疗中的常规发育筛查:一项试点研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jul 10;24(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02093-7.
2
Improving assessment of child development: Results of a quality improvement intervention in general practice.改善儿童发育评估:全科医疗质量改进干预的结果
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Jul;56(7):1053-1059. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14813. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
3
The challenges of trying to increase preventive healthcare for children in general practice: results of a feasibility study.在全科医疗中增加儿童预防性保健服务面临的挑战:一项可行性研究的结果
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Aug 5;16:94. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0306-x.
4
Health professional perceptions regarding screening tools for developmental surveillance for children in a multicultural part of Sydney, Australia.澳大利亚悉尼多元文化地区医疗专业人员对儿童发育监测筛查工具的看法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Apr 2;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0728-3.
5
Parent's Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) detects developmental problems compared to Denver II.与丹佛发育筛查测验第二版相比,父母对儿童发育状况的评估(PEDS)能够检测出发育问题。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Nov;88 Suppl 3:S188-92.
6
Barriers and enablers to delivery of the Healthy Kids Check: an analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model.实现健康儿童检查的障碍和促进因素:基于理论领域框架和 COM-B 模型的分析。
Implement Sci. 2014 May 23;9:60. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-60.
7
Enablers and Barriers to Identifying Children at Risk of Developmental Delay: A Pilot Study of Australian Maternal and Child Health Services.识别发育迟缓风险儿童的促进因素和障碍:澳大利亚母婴健康服务的试点研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Jun;25(6):967-979. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03077-0. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
8
Responding to Young People's Health Risks in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomised Trial of Training Clinicians in Screening and Motivational Interviewing.应对初级保健中年轻人的健康风险:一项针对临床医生进行筛查和动机性访谈培训的整群随机试验
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0137581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137581. eCollection 2015.
9
Development and feasibility of a child obesity prevention intervention in general practice: the Healthy 4 Life pilot study.全科医疗中儿童肥胖预防干预措施的开发与可行性:“健康4生活”试点研究
J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Nov;50(11):890-4. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12671. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
10
Parents' evaluation of developmental status: how well do parents' concerns identify children with behavioral and emotional problems?父母对发育状况的评估:父母的担忧在多大程度上能识别出有行为和情绪问题的儿童?
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2003 Mar;42(2):133-8. doi: 10.1177/000992280304200206.

引用本文的文献

1
Survey of Well-being of Young Children: Implementation and Impact on Care Quality.幼儿福祉调查:实施情况及其对护理质量的影响
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2025 Aug 27;10(5):e843. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000843. eCollection 2025 Sep-Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Enablers and Barriers to Identifying Children at Risk of Developmental Delay: A Pilot Study of Australian Maternal and Child Health Services.识别发育迟缓风险儿童的促进因素和障碍:澳大利亚母婴健康服务的试点研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Jun;25(6):967-979. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03077-0. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
2
The Acceptability and Effectiveness of Web-Based Developmental Surveillance Programs: Rapid Review.基于网络的发育监测项目的可接受性和有效性:快速综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 23;8(4):e16085. doi: 10.2196/16085.
3
Improving assessment of child development: Results of a quality improvement intervention in general practice.
改善儿童发育评估:全科医疗质量改进干预的结果
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Jul;56(7):1053-1059. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14813. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
The Developmental Screening Behaviors, Skills, Facilitators, and Constraints of Family Nurse Practitioners in Primary Care: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.家庭护士从业者在初级保健中发育筛查行为、技能、促进因素和限制因素:定性描述性研究。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2019 Jul-Aug;33(4):466-477. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
5
A case study of well child care visits at general practices in a region of disadvantage in Sydney.悉尼弱势地区一般实践中幼儿保健访视的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205235. eCollection 2018.
6
Trends in the prevalence and distribution of teacher-identified special health-care needs across three successive population cohorts.连续三个年龄组中教师确认的特殊医疗保健需求的患病率和分布趋势。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Mar;55(3):312-319. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14192. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
7
Developmental Delay: When and How to Screen.发育迟缓:何时以及如何进行筛查。
Am Fam Physician. 2017 Jul 1;96(1):36-43.
8
Preventive healthcare for young children: A systematic review of interventions in primary care.幼儿预防性医疗保健:初级保健干预措施的系统评价
Prev Med. 2017 Jun;99:236-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
9
Can We Identify Parents Who Do Not Verbally Share Concerns for Their Children's Development?我们能否识别出那些没有口头表达对孩子发育担忧的父母?
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2017 Apr;38(3):224-227. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000426.
10
Prevalence and factors associated with parental concerns about development detected by the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) at 6-month, 12-month and 18-month well-child checks in a birth cohort.在一个出生队列中,通过父母对发育状况评估量表(PEDS)在 6 个月、12 个月和 18 个月的儿童健康检查中,评估父母对发育问题的关注及其相关因素。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 8;6(9):e012144. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012144.